The --site= option is really only for internal developer use, so I
don't think we gain anything from being strict about it.
(And it doesn't help that the error message one gets pre-this-patch is
super confusing). Fixes Trac #937.
(imported from commit 8d699982aa6830f9eae2bccd6d0c7a1e0e53dd56)
Give better examples, and rewrite options parsing to be more consistent across examples.
Make it more obvious that you can use "--user" and "--api-key" with our python examples.
This bumps our python bindings to v0.1.9
(imported from commit 297468088f864b7d585e567dc45523ea681f1856)
Previously our receive API bindings were broken in our API tarballs
because we weren't including the receive API bindings which they used.
This requires our deploying the built API tarball to the prod server
when we deploy it so that the link on /api isn't broken.
(imported from commit 14ecaab34556f4e29c72f4f567d8af73c89d6297)
Currently the interface for editing messages is limited to a
command-line API tool; it's great for testing with e.g.:
./api/examples/edit-message --message=348135 --content="test $(date +%s)" --site=http://localhost:9991 --subject="test"
The next commit will add a user interface for actually doing the editing.
(imported from commit bdd408cec2946f31c2292e44f724f96ed5938791)
The previous version of our code only worked with python-requests <
1.0 (as is the case on our servers), the new version will work with
any python-requests new enough to have a .json at all.
(imported from commit 77ffe3e0d890fe88776c313e0e3289aee1bb30ea)
Previously we sent it always as "data", which caused problems for GET
requests where there is no request body.
(imported from commit 20084d1da1b8228cc484536ca4d6f77f547a9d78)
We also switch the Python client to use a client string of "API: Python"
to allow us to determine more easily which bindings our users are using.
(imported from commit 7216c3d150b371835f14d1bc8d81979a92e44925)
After this commit, we built an API tarball and sent it to
CUSTOMER4, and then promptly reverted the commit so that
we could continue as we had been before.
(imported from commit 662519a79edd508e7c115b451a7ec6fbdf1fc0a4)
To incorporate the site parsing fix from a couple weeks ago.
Before deploying this to prod we need to run build-api-tarball and
deploy the code to humbughq.com as for usual API releases.
(imported from commit f6711f5cc07d174c30866029032a595ecee785a3)
At Ksplice we used /usr/bin/python because we shipped dependencies as Debian /
Red Hat packages, which would be installed against the system Python. We were
also very careful to use only Python 2.3 features so that even old system
Python would still work.
None of that is true at Humbug. We expect users to install dependencies
themselves, so it's more likely that the Python in $PATH is correct. On OS X
in particular, it's common to have five broken Python installs and there's no
expectation that /usr/bin/python is the right one.
The files which aren't marked executable are not interesting to run as scripts,
so we just remove the line there. (In general it's common to have libraries
that can also be executed, to run test cases or whatever, but that's not the
case here.)
(imported from commit 437d4aee2c6e66601ad3334eefd50749cce2eca6)
We need to run build-api-tarball and release it on prod when pushing
this commit to prod.
(imported from commit 09e86500d2d208b1972c87444b4c2d56faafc8e6)
Before pushing this to prod, we need to build the 0.1.2 API tarball
and deploy it to the appropriate place on our servers.
(imported from commit ec1a07b3cc2a3e360dac32823ff7cd9de9de1da2)
This works much better for working with staging, since rather than
needing to tell each individual tool that you're using staging, you
just specify that along with your API (which at the moment implies
whether you should be using staging or prod).
(imported from commit c1de8e72c24f35ef2160bce5339a5f03c6e1da95)
This should fix the symptoms of the problem we've been having where a
few API clients using the MIT Zephyr mirroring system sometimes seem
to end up with a too-old value of last.
(imported from commit 9f2426fa6a7e8365e8d3443bfd2cce3238cc9510)
I would prefer to be testing the attribute itself rather than the
version, but it's not easy to access without an actual request object,
and I'd prefer to compute this once-and-for-all on startup, rather
than on each request, since the latter just seems fragile.
(imported from commit dd74cadb1b2359faeb3e1b482faeee4003dfad77)
Bots are not part of what we distribute, so put them in the repo root.
We also updated some of the bots to use relative path names.
(imported from commit 0471d863450712fd0cdb651f39f32e9041df52ba)
My previous commit (fbdc092029bbafea716e27fbb99fec58a6f24392)
incorrectly specified that you must have a version of python-requests
greater than 0.12.1, when it should be a >= relation since 0.12.1 is
sufficient.
(imported from commit 9f716af6dfe0ce17d982fc22d507f144e9543bec)
Previously, if users of our code put the API folder in their pyshared
they would have to import it as "humbug.humbug". By moving Humbug's API
into a directory named "humbug" and moving the API into __init__, you
can just "import humbug".
(imported from commit 1d2654ae57f8ecbbfe76559de267ec4889708ee8)
Tim Abbott
acrefoot
Jessica McKellar
Luke Faraone
Zev Benjamin
Leo Franchi
Waseem Daher
Keegan McAllister