Since we're adding this to a large number of portico pages, there's no
guarantee that these pages actually have a CSRF input.
Though given that the logout template contains a CSRF input,
realistically it should always be present.
If a user has an old mention and has since been renamed, there's
really nothing for us to do to render it; we should just return as
though we have no data.
Fix an issue that when a message is being edited, sometimes compose
options are hidden if there is no time limit. Also, move the options
further from the time limit to make them more noticeable.
Fix#11056.
This changes a few things:
* Deplicates deps_to_install logic.
* Has a retry flag, under which we can guard the apt retry print statements.
* Makes the install_system_deps flow more parallel.
The `replying_to_message` field was used in some
early versions of compose fade, but it has no more
use in the current code.
The drafts implementation didn't really make any sense,
anyway, as we were claiming to reply to the same
message we were drafting.
A common source of confusion for new users is sending a message when
you're scrolled up in the message feed; in this case, it's nice to
communicate to the user why the message is not in view.
Fixes#10792.
Restructured by tabbott to replace overly complex logic for getting
the position of the new message with a `message_list.get_row()` call.
Now, we correctly avoid calling various password quality/strength
functions in the registration flow in the event that there isn't a
password form on the current page.
Before, some code wasn't inside a block at all, while other code was
using an incorrect check (an empty jQuery object is not falsey).
The overall result was that this would often crash on certain
pages/flows, stopping JS execution and causing various secondary
problems.
The first bug fixed here has been around for a long
time--we were redundantly updating unread counts
indirectly via muting_ui.initialize(). The
unread counts also get updated in
unread_ui.initialize(), when we have more valid
state. (And it's worth noting here that the unread
counts get updated yet again once message fetches
complete.)
The second bug was a very recent regression from
my recent stream name -> stream id cleanup in the
muting system. We now depend on stream_data to
initialize muting data, so we need to initialize
muting.js slightly later in the process.
These fixes are intertwined, because they were both
somewhat caused by the anti-pattern of having
muting_ui.js initialize unread_ui.js and muting.js,
instead of doing more direct, fine-grained initialization
from ui_init.js.
Essentially we replace this code:
exports.update_muted_topics = function (muted_topics) {
muting.set_muted_topics(muted_topics);
unread_ui.update_unread_counts();
};
with this:
exports.initialize = function () {
exports.set_muted_topics(page_params.muted_topics);
};
And the modules load like this:
stream_data
...
muting
...
unread_ui
And we don't need any page-load initialization for muting_ui,
which is mostly used for Settings/Muted topics.
This function used to be called initialize_from_page_params(),
and we called it indirectly through `subs.js`.
Now we call it directly from `ui_init.js`, which gives us a
bit more control over how things are initialized. In fact,
this sets us up for the next commit, where I fix a recent
regression I introduced.
This is mostly about cleaning up the naming convention
for streams and topics, but it also adds a test that
specifically tests the muted-topic case (without any
other factors that would prevent a notification).
Before this commit, it was possible to change the
API for muting topics and get false positives, even
when the test setup was clearly broken.
This checks if push_notification_enabled() is set to false in
handle_push_notification and adds an early return statement.
This is a significant performance optimization for our unit tests
because the push notifications code path does a number of database
queries, and this migration means we don't end up doing those queries
the hundreds of times we send PMs or mentions in our tests where we're
not trying to test the push notifications functionality.
This should also have a small message sending scalability improvement
for any Zulip servers without push notifications enabled.
Tweaked by tabbott to fix a few small issues.
Fixes#10895.
While reviewing #11012, I discovered a nondeterministic result for
test_signup, which I tracked down to specifically this triple of tests
failing when run in this order:
test-backend GCMSuccessTest \
zerver.tests.test_push_notifications.TestAPNs.test_get_apns_client \
zerver.tests.test_signup.LoginTest.test_register
with a query count mismatch like this:
expected length: 73
actual length: 79
Comparing the list of queries, it's clear that test_register was
seeing `push_notifications_enabled()` returning True in this test order.
It's not clear why GCMSuccessTest was required here (it was!), but
further debugging determined the problem was that
`test_get_apns_client` left the _apns_client initialization system in
a state where get_apns_client would return a non-None value, resulting
in push_notifications_enabled() returning True for future tests.
The immediate fix is to just reset the `_apns_client` and
`_apns_client_initializedstate` state properly after the test runs;
but arguably we should do a larger refactor to make this less
fragile.
The data attribute here has some value if you're
inspecting the HTML in the browser, but it's not
worth the extra code.
All the list items have data-stream-id, so there's
no need for the parent to have it.
The stream_list test that was fixed here was sort of
broken. It accomplished the main goal of verifying
what gets rendered, but now the data setup part is
more like the actual app code (and simpler, too).
Tim Abbott
Steve Howell
Marco Burstein
rht
Vaibhav
shubham-padia
ishanrai05
Rishi Gupta