This addresses confusion we had with some organizations where they
were surprised that with only LDAP enabled, the "invite more users"
feature was available.
Fixes#11685.
This extracts a function for computing show_invites and
show_add_streams, for better readability and testability.
This commit was substantially cleaned up by tabbott.
This legacy cross-realm bot hasn't been used in several years, as far
as I know. If we wanted to re-introduce it, I'd want to implement it
as an embedded bot using those common APIs, rather than the totally
custom hacky code used for it that involves unnecessary queue workers
and similar details.
Fixes#13533.
The alt text of the leading images were displayed as preview
content in inbox by email clients like gmail. Since the leading
images were used mostly for decoration this made the preview
content gibberish. It's fine to set the alt attributes to empty
from accessibility point of view since the old alt attributes
did't added any meaningful information.
This changeset is prepartory work for doing something reasonable with
analytics data during the zulip -> zulip data import process (and
potentially e.g. slack -> Zulip as well).
To support that, we need to make it possible to do our analytics
calculations for a single realm.
We do this while maintaining backwards compatibility and avoiding
massive duplicated code by adding an optional `realm` argument to the
entrypoints to the analytics system, especially process_count_stat.
More work involving restructuring FillState will be required for this
to be actually usable for its intented purpose, but this commit is a
nice checkpoint along the way.
Tweaked by tabbott to adjust comments and disable InstallationCount
updates when a realm argument is specified.
authenticate_remote_user already takes care of calling the authenticate
with the dummy backend. Also, return_data is not used and catching
DoesNotExist exception is not needed, as the dummy backend just returns
None if user isn't found.
Because of how login_or_register_remote_user code is structured, this
doesn't change how the flow will go, but it's not a clean use of
login_or_register_remote_user to call it with is_signup=True if sign up
shouldn't actually happen - and may be fragile when refactoring
login_or_register_remote_user.
In other places where we set request._email, we set it to the
delivery_email, as that's more informative in orgs with hidden email
settings, where user.email will be useless.
When a user clicked the current emoji format in "display settings",
we'd show an infinite loading spinner (basically as a side effect of
trying to tell the server to change the emoji format to what it
already was).
Fix this by aborting early if the emoji format is already the option
that the user clicked.
Fixes#13684.
We now only go the server if both of these
conditions are true:
- our message data seems incomplete for
the stream
- we haven't already fetched history
This function will make more sense when we start
tracking api calls that retrieve topic history.
The unit tests here are kinda duplicating what we
have in the stream_data tests. If we move the
function out of stream_data, we can kill off the
tests there, but for now I think a bit of duplicate
testing is fine here.
All the callers seem to have integer stream_ids
already, either from the message object or
some sub object.
We also use clear() inside the test-only reset()
method.
Previously, links to deleted streams would be incorrectly rendered as
stream's name).
Fixes an issue that was reported where after deleting the "general"
stream, the welcome turtle messages might appear as links to
This updates our error handling of invalid Slack API tokens (and other
networking error handling) to mostly make sense:
* A token that doesn't start with `xoxp-` gives an extended error early.
* An AssertionError for the codebase is correctly declared as such.
* We check for token shape errors before querying the Slack API.
We could still do useful work to raise custom exception classes here.
Thanks to @stavrospat for raising this issue.
This is mostly for tactical reasons. It's hard to
get 100% test coverage on topic_list.js, but it
should be easy to get 100% test coverage on this
very important function.
I considered just moving this code into topic_data.js,
but it just didn't feel quite right. I feel like
this is a pretty core piece of code that's nice
to be by itself and not be near other complicated
code that does stuff like build widgets or talk
to servers. (And, again, it's not just the actual
code here, which is pretty small, it's the unit
tests, which are inherently verbose to exercise
all the edge cases.)
This test mostly tests how we glue everything
together, but I want to change that in an upcoming
commit.
Also, the data stuff that it tests is now better
covered by the test recent tests I added.
There was an edge case with the old
code when you had exactly between 6 and 8
topics and all in cache, with a couple of
the topics being unread.
We would show "more topics" when you were
actually seeing all your possible topics.
To test this:
- create 7 topics on Venice
- as Iago, narrow to any of the Venice
topics
- as Aaron, send unreads to 3 or 4
of the other topics
Eventually Iago will have all possible
topics in the sidebar. On master we'll
show "more topics", whereas after this commit
we correctly avoid that.
It's a pretty harmless bug, since it just
leads to a useless zoom-in.
I have always felt we should zoom-in
regardless of how many topics you have,
just for consistency sake, but I also
understand the rationale behind our
current intentions.
This is basically trying to confine the
rendering logic to a smaller function,
since I want to work toward a better
approach for redrawing the topic list.
Also, since the new function is now
purely data-oriented, it will be a
bit easier to test various edge cases.
If you clicked for no more topics and then the server didn't find any,
we once had code that would say "No more topics" in light gray at the
bottom of the topic list.
The feature appears to have been broken by some detail in the
`self.dom` refactoring. More importantly, it's not clear it's useful
as opposed to clutter.
Since we added the `stream.first_message_id` feature, it's now very
rare for the `more topics` option to appear when there aren't in fact
older topics that could be fetched. In cases where there are not, the
UI is still clear about what's happening -- it shows a loading
indicator and then displays a list of topics that doesn't have
anything new.
So we're removing this feature; we can re-add it without too much
difficulty if user feedback in the future suggests it would be useful
after all.
The only place we ever set active-sub-filter is
right after we build the template, so there is
no reason to have it be a separate step.
(I made a similar fix to pm_list recently, and
this helps set the stage for doing vdom-like
stuff.)
The previous logic was a bit byzantine, making a lot of inferences
based on which conditionals had already been processed that made it
hard to read. This simple function approach promises to be more
readable.
This is for consistency with how we show unreads in muted topics at
the stream level, avoiding distracting users with the appearance of
unread messages in muted topics that they've made clear they are not
interested in.
Arguably, we should show a faded count if there are unreads on muted
topics (but none on unmuted topics), but that seems somewhat complex
to maintain, and we'd benefit from user feedback to make an effective
decision on whether it'd be an improvement.
Fixes#13676.
I think this probably matches users' expected behavior that muted
streams shouldn't get in their way unless the user is actively looking
for them. If a user has a lot of muted topics with active traffic
(e.g. because topics corresponding to channels in a mirrored Slack
instance), they would previously find their 5 slots cluttered with
those muted topics even if there were unmuted topics with unread
messages.
Fixes#13677.
responses is an module analogous to httpretty for mocking external
URLs, with a very similar interface (potentially cleaner in that it
makes use of context managers).
The most important (in the moment) problem with httpretty is that it
breaks the ability to use redis in parts of code where httpretty is
enabled. From more research, the module in general has tendency to
have various troublesome bugs with breaking URLs that it shouldn't be
affecting, caused by it working at the socket interface layer. While
those issues could be fixed, responses seems to be less buggy (based
on both third-party reports like ckan/ckan#4755 and our own experience
in removing workarounds for bugs in httpretty) and is more actively
maintained.
This correct various inaccuracies and adds a bulleted list structure
for better clarity.
I think there's a lot more that could be done here in the form of
linking to other pages, discussing restarting `run-dev.py`, etc.
Added a link from docs/development/using ("Using the Development
Environment") to ./authentication ("Authentication in the development
environment") to help people working on the authentication systems
or anyone who needs an API key.
Separate using.html into Server/Web/Mobile sections so that readers
will find what they're looking for more quickly. Server is at the top
because it contains information relevant to web and mobile developers,
e.g., that the `run-dev.py` console output will provide useful errors.
Fixes#13655.
Tim Abbott
Abhishek-Balaji
Rohitt Vashishtha
Vishnu KS
rht
arpit551
Mateusz Mandera
orientor
Steve Howell
Rodriq
Chris Bobbe
Jonathan Cobb