Add 'six' to setup-py3k, because it is being used in tools/lister.py.
Add 'typing' to setup-py3k, so that tools/lister.py can be type
annotated in the future.
The `with sh.sudo` pattern that we were using in python-sh was
deprecated, and emperically hangs on Ubuntu xenial. Since in general
the use of python-sh/python-pbs caused trouble (requiring extra
dependencies, confusing syntax), this just removes it.
We replace it with a new zulip_tools.py library function that echoes
the command line and streams the output.
We do the same to install-phantomjs so we can remove that dependency.
tools/travis/py3k used to always exit with exit code 0.
It should exit with 1 when fixers detect a compatibility issue.
py3k used [ -z "$failed" ] to check if there was a failure.
This is wrong, since if no failure has occured, failed=0,
and -z checks if a string is of zero length. This commit also
fixes this bug.
In py3k, "git reset --hard" was called only if
libmodernize.fixes.fix_dict_six changed files and some of those
changes are not considered false positives by py3k.
But if all of those changes are not considered false positives
by py3k, then "git reset --hard" is not called and the repository
is no longer clean.
This commit fixes this bug.
tools/travis/py3k used to only check files whose names ended with .py.
Now it also checks python scripts which don't have an extension.
It uses tools/lister.py to get a list of all python files.
It's not clear whether this will end up being net negative in value in
the long term since it's kinda hard to understand the output, but in
the short term it should prevent regressions.
Travis CI's model of installing every version of postgres on the test
VM and then shutting all the versions other than the one requested
down seems to not work very well with doing apt upgrades. It seems
the best way to resolve this is to just uninstall the versions we
don't need.
We ran into a bug with the Travis CI infrastructure where it postgres
9.1 is installed on the system, and so when we'd do an apt upgrade
with a new version of 9.1, the 9.1 daemon would end up getting started
and conflict with the 9.3 daemon we were trying to run.
This test caught a few bugs where refactoring had made management
commands fail (and would have caught a few more recent ones).
Ideally we'd replace this with a more advanced test that actually
tests that the management command do something useful, but it's a
start.
This tests whether a new patch introduces any regressions related to
any of the Python 3 compatibility fixers we've run in the past, so
that we can make continuous forward progress on our path towards
Python 3 compatibility.
This produces error output that looks like this:
"""
Testing for additions of Python 2 patterns we've removed as part of moving towards Python 3 compatibility.
Running Python 3 compatibility test lib2to3.fixes.fix_apply
Running Python 3 compatibility test lib2to3.fixes.fix_except
diff --git a/zerver/views/__init__.py b/zerver/views/__init__.py
index b5c0102..2defd46 100644
--- a/zerver/views/__init__.py
+++ b/zerver/views/__init__.py
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ def accounts_register(request):
do_activate_user(user_profile)
do_change_password(user_profile, password)
do_change_full_name(user_profile, full_name)
- except UserProfile.DoesNotExist, e:
+ except UserProfile.DoesNotExist as e:
user_profile = do_create_user(email, password, realm, full_name, short_name,
prereg_user=prereg_user,
newsletter_data={"IP": request.META['REMOTE_ADDR']})
Python 3 compatibility error(s) detected! See diff above for what you need to change.
"""
With this change, we are now testing the production static asset
pipeline and installation process in a new testing job (and also run
the frontend/backend tests separately).
This means that changes that break the Zulip static asset pipeline or
production installation process are more likely to fail tests. The
testing is imperfect in that it does not have proper isolation -- we
build a complete Zulip development environment and then install a
Zulip production environment on top of it, so e.g. any apt
dependencies installed for Zulip development will still be available
for the Zulip production environment. But, it's better than nothing!
A good v2 of this would be to have the production setup process just
install the minimum stuff needed to run `build-release-tarball` and
then uninstall it / clean it up so that we can do a more clear
production installation, but that's more work.
Eklavya Sharma
Tim Abbott