This changes the time render to be done on the client-side and
therefore take advantage of knowing the client’s timezone, along with
being formatted in a more human-parseable way.
This adds to Zulip support for a user changing their own email
address.
It's backed by a huge amount of work by Steve Howell on making email
changes actually work from a UI perspective.
Fixes#734.
* Created a drafts modal to display/restore/delete drafts
* Created a Draft model to support storing draft data in localstorage
* Removed existing restore-draft functionality
* Added casper and node tests for drafts functionality
Fixes#1717.
The comments explain why this change is correct. This change is
useful because it's better to not have dead code paths, both because
it makes our life easier for coverage analysis, and because the else
statement provided the illusion that it could actually happen.
If the analysis in that comment is wrong, we'd rather have a 500 error
so we fix the bug than things silently sorta working.
This arguably regresses the Zephyr experience, in that we no longer
consider 'foo.d.d.d.d.d' to be something that gets narrowed in with
the rest, but that's a pretty rare use case anyway.
In practice, using that many '.d's anyway only happens a few times a
year.
Our client code will now receive avatar_url in
page_params.people_list during page load, so it will be
able to use more current urls for old messages (the client
already had some logic for that and was just missing the
data).
We also add avatar_url to the realm_user/add event.
When we change the avatar, we make sure to always send a
realm_user/update event (even for bots).
We also needed to add avatar_version and
avatar_source to our active users cache.
This makes life a lot easier for people inviting users to a new Zulip
organization, since they can give some form of context now.
Modified by tabbott to clean up CSS, backend code flow, and improve
the formatting of the emails.
Fixes: #1409.
We now make tests that call EventsRegisterTest.do_test()
explicitly specify whether calls to apply_events() would
change the state of initially fetched data. Generally
these tests exist to test that logic (as well as verifying
schemas of events), so if they stop testing that logic, it
is usually a broken test.
Some tests are exempted from the check here, because I think
they don't really change state--such as updating messages or
notifications. You can set state_change_expected to False
for those tests.
For all the tests that deal with flipping boolean flags, I
set their value to False before calling do_test twice now.
For the authentication backends, I mock the settings so that
more backends are "supported" and therefore part of the event
and the fetched state.
Finally, for the bot tests, I make sure to use a bot the user
can access.
The original include_subscribers implementation did not correctly
update the apply_events code path to avoid adding 'subscribers' dicts
to things. This corrects that oversight.
There's a new option, `include_subscribers`, that controls whether the
API sends down subscriber data for the various streams you are
subscribed to.
This has significant performance savings for large realms with naive
clients, and saves a bunch of bandwidth as well.
This fixes a performance regression loading the Zulip homepage.
While it decreases the utility of the display of messages, it's only
so much loss (because the display recipient for PMs was totally broken
anyway).
Fixes#268.
Modified significantly by tabbott to:
* improve code cleanliness / repetition
* add missing translation tags
* move code into message_edit.js
* correspond with the new backend.
* not display the option for messages only topic-edited
This makes it super easy for frontend code using this view code to
produce a nice display of the history.
This also fixes an off-by-one error with the timestamps.
Our lists of rabbitmq queues was likely to end up out of date, since
there was nothing enforcing that the various lists of queues were
correct or the same as each other.
Based on work by Kartik Maji in #1204.
This has a few significant changes from the original version:
* We correctly handle filling in data for topic edits
* Has a complete test suite verifying correctness of the logic
* Currently, it doesn't include a special "start" entry
Things we may want to further change include:
* Adding a special "start" entry.
* Reversing the order of the history data returned for clarity.
This is important for, in the future, being able to display who edited
the topic of a message if that wasn't the person who originally sent
the message.
Elliott Jin
Tim Abbott
K.Kanakhin
Brock Whittaker
Umair Khan
Sampriti Panda
Steve Howell
Ayush Jain
Kartik Maji
ausDensk