We now complain if a test author sends a stream message
that does not result in the sender getting a
UserMessage row for the message.
This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that
the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream
as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the
AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the
sender to the stream.
We exempt bots from this check, although it is
plausible we should only exempt the system bots like
the notification bot.
I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream,
but that can be a little more expensive than the
current check, and we generally want test setup to be
explicit.
If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human
sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want
an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the
backend to just write a UserMessage row in that
hypothetical situation.
For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed
here, the author just wants their test setup to
realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs
may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to
Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to
Scotland.
Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high
school, and our stream subscriptions don't even
necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his
characters in.
There may also be some legitimate use case where an
author wants to simulate sending a message to an
unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can
always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
fe25517295 adjusted the email_notifications codepath to use
`lxml.html.fragment_fromstring` method when parsing
`rendered_content`, but left the tests using a helper which called
`fromstring`.
Switching the tests to match the code as run reveals a bug -- using
`drop_tree` on all `message_inline_image` classes now _does_ remove
all of a top-level image-URL-only message. Previously, such messages
were "safe" from the block that calls `drop_tree` only by dint of
`drop_tree` being a silent no-op for the root element. When parsed
using `fragment_fromstring`, they are no longer the root, and as such
an empty message results.
Reorder relative_to_full_url to check for only one `message_inline_image`
within the top `<div>`, and only run the `drop_tree` path in the
alternate case. Tests must be adjusted for their output now including
one more layer of `<div>`.
We do not allow mentioning system user groups for now
because this can lead to circumventing the wildcard
mention restrictions. It will be enabled once we add
a setting to control that.
This is implemented by just ignoring it as one of the
mentioned user group even if the message content
inlcudes the mention syntax for it and the message
is sent normally.
We still keep the for_mention parameter for accessing
user group while sending email and push notifications
as mentioning system user groups will be allowed in
future.
This commit also removes the test for email notifications
for system user groups as we are not allowing mentioning
them.
This commit is only for backend change as we already
exclude the system groups from mention typeaheads and
other UI.
The transforms called from `build_message_payload` use
`lxml.html.fromstring` to parse (and stringify, and re-parse) the HTML
generated by Markdown. However, this function fails if it is passed
an empty document. "empty" is broader than just the empty string; it
also includes any document made entirely out of control characters,
spaces, unpaired surrogates, U+FFFE, or U+FFFF, and so forth. These
documents would fail to parse, and raise a ParserError.
Using `lxml.html.fragment_fromstring` handles these cases, but does by
wrapping the contents in a <div> every time it is called. As such,
replacing each `fromstring` with `fragment_fromstring` would nest
another layer of `<div>`.
Instead of each of the helper functions re-parsing, modifying, and
stringifying the HTML, parse it once with `fragment_fromstring` and
pass around the parsed document to each helper, which modifies it
in-place. This adds one outer `<div>`, requiring minor changes to
tests and the prepend-sender functions.
The modification to add the sender is left using BeautifulSoup, as
that sort of transform is much less readable, and more fiddly, in raw
lxml.
Partial fix for #19559.
We do not allow any user to edit the system user groups (including
renaming, deleting, adding or removing members, etc.) from the
API. These user groups will change only by the code when a new
user is added or role of a user is changed.
This is implemented by rejecting access_user_group_by_id always
except the case when it is use to get the user group for sending
email and push notifications, as we would need to send notifications
to the mentioned user group.
Previously, we checked for the `enable_offline_email_notifications` and
`enable_offline_push_notifications` settings (which determine whether the
user will receive notifications for PMs and mentions) just before sending
notifications. This has a few problem:
1. We do not have access to all the user settings in the notification
handlers (`handle_missedmessage_emails` and `handle_push_notifications`),
and therefore, we cannot correctly determine whether the notification should
be sent. Checks like the following which existed previously, will, for
example, incorrectly not send notifications even when stream email
notifications are enabled-
```
if not receives_offline_email_notifications(user_profile):
return
```
With this commit, we simply do not enqueue notifications if the "offline"
settings are disabled, which fixes that bug.
Additionally, this also fixes a bug with the "online push notifications"
feature, which was, if someone were to:
* turn off notifications for PMs and mentions (`enable_offline_push_notifications`)
* turn on stream push notifications (`enable_stream_push_notifications`)
* turn on "online push" (`enable_online_push_notifications`)
then, they would still receive notifications for PMs when online.
This isn't how the "online push enabled" feature is supposed to work;
it should only act as a wrapper around the other notification settings.
The buggy code was this in `handle_push_notifications`:
```
if not (
receives_offline_push_notifications(user_profile)
or receives_online_push_notifications(user_profile)
):
return
// send notifications
```
This commit removes that code, and extends our `notification_data.py` logic
to cover this case, along with tests.
2. The name for these settings is slightly misleading. They essentially
talk about "what to send notifications for" (PMs and mentions), and not
"when to send notifications" (offline). This commit improves this condition
by restricting the use of this term only to the database field, and using
clearer names everywhere else. This distinction will be important to have
non-confusing code when we implement multiple options for notifications
in the future as dropdown (never/when offline/when offline or online, etc).
3. We should ideally re-check all notification settings just before the
notifications are sent. This is especially important for email notifications,
which may be sent after a long time after the message was sent. We will
in the future add code to thoroughly re-check settings before sending
notifications in a clean manner, but temporarily not re-checking isn't
a terrible scenario either.
This logic was peviously untested. This is a prep change for us
to completely depend on the logic here for the "read" flag, and
not on the `event_queue` code.
Add a `--dry-run` flag to send_custom_email management command
in order to provide a mechanism to verify the emails of the recipients
and the text of the email being sent before actually sending them.
Add tests to:
- Check that no emails are actually sent when we are in the dry-run mode.
- Check if the emails are printed correctly when we are in the dry-run mode.
Fixes#17767
Changed the name of the test-user cordelia from `Cordelia Lear` to
`Cordelia, Lear's daughter`.
This change will enable us to test users with escape characters in
their names.
I also updated the Node, Puppeteer, Backend tests and Fixtures to
support this change.
This is a hacky fix to avoid spoiler content leaking in emails. The
general idea here is to tell people to open Zulip to view the actual
message in full.
We create a mini-markdown parser here that strips away the fence content
that has the 'spoiler' tag for the text emails.
Our handling of html emails is much better in comparison where we can
use lxml to parse the spoiler blocks.
Use read-only types (List ↦ Sequence, Dict ↦ Mapping, Set ↦
AbstractSet) to guard against accidental mutation of the default
value.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Fixes#2665.
Regenerated by tabbott with `lint --fix` after a rebase and change in
parameters.
Note from tabbott: In a few cases, this converts technical debt in the
form of unsorted imports into different technical debt in the form of
our largest files having very long, ugly import sequences at the
start. I expect this change will increase pressure for us to split
those files, which isn't a bad thing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Automatically generated by the following script, based on the output
of lint with flake8-comma:
import re
import sys
last_filename = None
last_row = None
lines = []
for msg in sys.stdin:
m = re.match(
r"\x1b\[35mflake8 \|\x1b\[0m \x1b\[1;31m(.+):(\d+):(\d+): (\w+)", msg
)
if m:
filename, row_str, col_str, err = m.groups()
row, col = int(row_str), int(col_str)
if filename == last_filename:
assert last_row != row
else:
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
last_filename = filename
last_row = row
line = lines[row - 1]
if err in ["C812", "C815"]:
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 1] + "," + line[col - 1 :]
elif err in ["C819"]:
assert line[col - 2] == ","
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 2] + line[col - 1 :].lstrip(" ")
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
We're migrating to using the cleaner zulip.com domain, which involves
changing all of our links from ReadTheDocs and other places to point
to the cleaner URL.
Generated by pyupgrade --py36-plus --keep-percent-format, but with the
NamedTuple changes reverted (see commit
ba7906a3c6, #15132).
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
mock is just a backport of the standard library’s unittest.mock now.
The SAMLAuthBackendTest change is needed because
MagicMock.call_args.args wasn’t introduced until Python
3.8 (https://bugs.python.org/issue21269).
The PROVISION_VERSION bump is skipped because mock is still an
indirect dev requirement via moto.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit merges do_change_is_admin and do_change_is_guest to a
single function do_change_user_role which will be used for changing
role of users.
do_change_is_api_super_user is added as a separate function for
changing is_api_super_user field of UserProfile.
We try to use the correct variation of `email`
or `delivery_email`, even though in some
databases they are the same.
(To find the differences, I temporarily hacked
populate_db to use different values for email
and delivery_email, and reduced email visibility
in the zulip realm to admins only.)
In places where we want the "normal" realm
behavior of showing emails (and having `email`
be the same as `delivery_email`), we use
the new `reset_emails_in_zulip_realm` helper.
A couple random things:
- I fixed any error messages that were leaking
the wrong email
- a test that claimed to rely on the order
of emails no longer does (we sort user_ids
instead)
- we now use user_ids in some place where we used
to use emails
- for IRC mirrors I just punted and used
`reset_emails_in_zulip_realm` in most places
- for MIT-related tests, I didn't fix email
vs. delivery_email unless it was obvious
I also explicitly reset the realm to a "normal"
realm for a couple tests that I frankly just didn't
have the energy to debug. (Also, we do want some
coverage on the normal case, even though it is
"easier" for tests to pass if you mix up `email`
and `delivery_email`.)
In particular, I just reset data for the analytics
and corporate tests.
We now have this API...
If you really just need to log in
and not do anything with the actual
user:
self.login('hamlet')
If you're gonna use the user in the
rest of the test:
hamlet = self.example_user('hamlet')
self.login_user(hamlet)
If you are specifically testing
email/password logins (used only in 4 places):
self.login_by_email(email, password)
And for failures uses this (used twice):
self.assert_login_failure(email)
This commit mostly makes our tests less
noisy, since emails are no longer an important
detail of sending messages (they're not even
really used in the API).
It also sets us up to have more scrutiny
on delivery_email/email in the future
for things that actually matter. (This is
a prep commit for something along those
lines, kind of hard to explain the full
plan.)
To avoid some hidden bugs in tests caused by every ldap user having the
same password, we give each user a different password, generated based
on their uids (to avoid some ugly hard-coding in a bunch of places).
Tim Abbott
Steve Howell
Alex Vandiver
Eeshan Garg
Sahil Batra
Anders Kaseorg
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
akshatdalton
Hashir Sarwar
Siddharth Asthana
Mateusz Mandera
Arun Sankar
shanukun
Aman Agrawal
Rohitt Vashishtha
Anders Kaseorg
sahil839
wowol
Steve Howell
Mateusz Mandera
Vishnu KS