These selectors have been deleted because they were not being used
anywhere in '/templates/zerver/emails/**', and do not seem relevant
for send_custom_email custom emails that we might do manually.
Apparently, Apple Mail interpreted the <body> text in the comment here
as the start of the body in the email in its special parser for
displaying a preview of emails in the inbox view, resulting in every
Zulip email being displayed as "tag out of the email, the ..." instead
of our configured preheader.
This commit places the email CSS into the `style` tag located in the
`head` section. This resolves the issue of being unable to apply
certain CSS styles that cannot be inlined, such as media queries and
pseudo-classes.
The migration to css-inline "fixed" the fact that styles from this
file previously were never applied to the internals of missed-message
emails.
Rewrite much of the CSS to more correctly scope to apply to the
appropriate elements, and document with comments the purpose of most
blocks.
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
This issue was introduced after we changed the library we use for
inlining CSS into email HTML. For some reason, the styles in
email.css were not applied earlier but were applied after we
migrated to css-inline. With this commit, we have fixed the
regression in background-color of email body.
Fixes#25083.
This issue was introduced after we changed the library we use for
inlining CSS into email HTML. For some reason, the styles in
email.css were not applied earlier but were applied after we
migrated to css-inline. With this commit, we have fixed the
regression in footer styles.
Fixes part of #25083
For our marketing emails, we want a width that's more appropriate for
newsletter context, vs. the narrow emails we use for transactional
content.
I haven't figured out a cleaner way to do this than duplicating most
of email_base_default.source.html. But it's not a big deal to
duplicate, since we've been changing that base template only about
once a year.
This is a dramatic redesign of the look and feel of our missed-message
emails, designed to decrease the feeling of clutter and just provide
the content users care about in a clear, visible fashion.
The antialiasing decisions we made for the webapp should be constant
over the entire page, not limited to particular subsections or themes.
If we wanted antialiasing, we should do it on the entire page, not
individual random widgets. But it's not clear we actually want to do
it on the entire page. The `-moz-osx-font-smoothing: grayscale`
setting now happens by default in OSX Mojave (40% world market share
right now and growing), so there's no reason to override it. And
without retina displays, generally, subpixel rendering provides better
results than antialiasing (which overrides subpixel rendering).
Thanks to Anders Kaseorg for advice on this issue.
Refactoring in 4e1c058 was not correct since recipient_block
and message_content checked for if not condition while
recipient_header checked for if.
The naming of classes in 6077a33 was also not correct
semantically.
It looked like I got some hex values wrong during the
hsl to hex conversions. I used the built in vscode color
converter for this so not really sure how this happened.
The colors are now equalent to the original hex colors
before the conversion to hsl was made in
5869cc3b6d
As part of this change, we port into the .messages class the work in
4e8e7348da to change overflow-y to auto,
not scroll (skipping that would result in a regression).
The CSS linter was pretty hard to reason about. It was
pretty flexible about certain things, but then it would
prevent seemingly innocuous code from getting checked in.
This commit overhauls the pretty-printer to be more composable,
where every object in the AST knows how to render itself. It
also cleans up a little bit of the pre_fluff/post_fluff logic
in the parser itself, so comments are more likely to be "attached"
to the AST node that make sense.
The linter is actually a bit more finicky about newlines, but
this is mostly a good thing, as most of the variations before
this commit were pretty arbitrary.
Some email services will provide default styling for things like
buttons, and in this case the site created a style that had a
`background` attribute that overrode our `background-color` attribute
because of CSS importance heirarchy. This swiches us to use
`background` as well.
This also forces no `text-shadow` on buttons.
Fixes: #6775.