This queue had a race condition with creation of another Timer while
maybe_send_batched_emails is still doing its work, which may cause
two or more threads to be running maybe_send_batched_emails
at the same time, mutating the shared data simultaneously.
Another less likely potential race condition was that
maybe_send_batched_emails after sending out its email, can call
ensure_timer(). If the consume function is run simultaneously
in the main thread, it will call ensure_timer() too, which,
given unfortunate timings, might lead to both calls setting a new Timer.
We add locking to the queue to avoid such race conditions.
Tested manually, by print debugging with the following setup:
1. Making handle_missedmessage_emails sleep 2 seconds for each email,
and changed BATCH_DURATION to 1s to make the queue start working
right after launching.
2. Putting a bunch of events in the queue.
3. ./manage.py process_queue --queue_name missedmessage_emails
4. Once maybe_send_batched_emails is called and while it's processing
the events, I pushed more events to the queue. That triggers the
consume() function and ensure_timer().
Before implementing the locking mechanism, this causes two threads
to run maybe_send_batched_emails at the same time, mutating each other's
shared data, causing a traceback such as
Exception in thread Thread-3:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/threading.py", line 916, in _bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/threading.py", line 1182, in run
self.function(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
File "/srv/zulip/zerver/worker/queue_processors.py", line 507, in maybe_send_batched_emails
del self.events_by_recipient[user_profile_id]
KeyError: '5'
With the locking mechanism, things get handled as expected, and
ensure_timer() exits if it can't obtain the lock due to
maybe_send_batched_emails still working.
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
This commit hides the "Save" and "Cancel" buttons
after the first click and shows a spinner until a
successful / failed response is received.
We do not allow sending any other message edit
requests during this time frame, similar to how
our inline topic edit ui works.
Fixes#16143.
This commit removes the part which mentions specifying the property field
type in new feauture tutorial as it is no longer required to specify the
type.
We raise two types of json_unauthorized when
MissingAuthenticationError is raised. Raising the one
with www_authenticate let's the client know that user needs
to be logged in to access the requested content.
Sending `www_authenticate='session'` header with the response
also stops modern web-browsers from showing a login form to the
user and let's the client handle it completely.
Structurally, this moves the handling of common authentication errors
to a single shared middleware exception handler.
If you look at line number 1121 (new) of commit 14c0a387cf,
I seem to have accidently set the description for a status
200 response to "Bad Request" instead of "Success" which
is what it really is. It's basically an ugly typo (maybe
due to hastily copy-pasting the template).
Signed-off-by: Hemanth V. Alluri <hdrive1999@gmail.com>
I noticed RateLimitTests.test_hit_ratelimits fails when run as an
individual test, but never when run after other tests. That's due to the
first API request in a run of tests taking a long time, as detailed in
the comment on the change to the setUp method.
Django always sets request.user to a UserProfile or AnonymousUser
instance, so it's better to mimic that in the tests where we pass a
dummy request objects for rate limiter testing purposes.
The data is now stored in memory if things are happening inside tornado.
That aside, there is no reason for a comment on a rate_limit_user call
to talk about low level implementation details of that function.
I can find no evidence of it being possible to get an Exception when
accessing request.user or for it to be falsy. Django should always set
request.user to either a UserProfile (if logged in) or AnonymousUser
instance. Thus, this seems to be dead code that's handling cases that
can't happen.
`zproject/settings.py` itself is mostly-empty now. Adjust the
references which should now point to `zproject/computed_settings.py`
or `zproject/default_settings.py`.
`update_message_flags` events used `operation` instead of `op`, the
latter being the standard field used in other events. So add `op`
field to `update_message_flags` and mark `operation` as deprecated,
so that it can be removed later.
It's possible that this is a new name for the "due"
field, but it's not totally clear.
In the exception we saw in the field:
payload['action']['data']['old']['dueComplete'] = False
payload['action']['data']['card']['dueComplete'] = True
We remove the fixture for create_check_item, which
has been bit-rotting for as long as we have ignored
this type of card data.
Our new test is more powerful, in the sense that it
shows we successfully ignore all fixtures of this
type.
If we want to handle this, we'll just need to get
new, representative fixture data from trello.
Commit c4254497b2
curiously had get_body() round tripping its data
through json load and dump.
I have seen this done for pretty-printing reasons,
but it doesn't apply here.
And if you're doing it for validation reasons,
you only need to do half the work, as my commit
here demonstrates.
We arguably don't even need the fail-fast code
here, since our fixtures are linted to be proper
json, I believe, plus downstream code probably
gives reasonably easy-to-diagnose symptoms.
For most cases you don't need to override `get_body`,
and for non-trivial cases, there's really no set pattern.
(It would be nice if we didn't default to json extensions
and just forced folks to be explicit about file extensions,
which would remove a whole class of `get_body` overrides.)
We introduce get_payload for the relatively
exceptional cases where webhooks return payloads
as dicts.
Having a simple "str" type for get_body will
allow us to extract test helpers that use
payloads from get_body() without the ugly
`Union[str, Dict[str, str]]` annotations.
I also tightened up annotations in a few places
where we now call get_payload (using Dict[str, str]
instead of Dict[str, Any]).
In the zendesk test I explicitly stringify
one of the parameters to satisfy mypy.
We tighten up the mypy types here. And then
once we know that expected_message and expected_topic
are never None, we don't have call the do_test_message
and do_test_topic helpers any more, so we eliminate
them, too.
Finally, we don't return a message, since no tests
use the message currently.
If we're not passing in expected_topic or expected_message
to check_webhook, it's better to just call send_webhook_payload,
since we'll want to explicitly check our messages
anyway.
This preps us to always require those fields for
check_webhook, which can prevent insidious testing no-ops.
This forces us to be a bit more explicit about testing
the three key values in any stream message, and it
also de-clutters the code a bit. I eventually want
to phase out do_test_topic and friends, since they
have the pitfall that you can call them and have them
do nothing, because they don't actually require
values to be be passed in.
I also clean up the code a bit for the tests that
have two new messages arriving.
Mateusz Mandera
Tim Abbott
savish
Vinit Singh
Ryan Rehman
sahil839
Aman
Priyansh Garg
Vishnu KS
Hemanth V. Alluri
Mateusz Mandera
Alex Vandiver
orientor
Steve Howell