For some reason, the CSS declared a different background color for this element
only with a narrow window media CSS query. Change this color to the default
background for the rest of this modal.
Fixes#22991.
SCIMClient is a type-unsafe workaround for django-scim2’s conflation
of SCIM users with Django users. Given that a SCIMClient is not a
UserProfile, it might as well not be a model at all, since it’s only
used to satisfy django-scim2’s request.user.is_authenticated queries.
This doesn’t solve the type safety issue with assigning a SCIMClient
to request.user, nor the performance issue with running the SCIM
middleware on non-SCIM requests. But it reduces the risk of potential
consequences worse than crashing, since there’s no longer a
request.user.id for Django to confuse with the ID of an actual
UserProfile.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
I found a highly reproducible bug using the "Mark as unread" feature,
which triggers a rerender via message_list.rerender_view().
The reproducer was as follows:
* Navigate to a narrow by going to All messages and using the `S` hotkey.
* Mark as unread to mark several messages as unread in that view.
* Notice that the message that had been selected in home_message_list
is immediately marked as read again.
What was happening is that the reselect_selected_id call for
message_lists.home (All messages) was incorrectly re-marking the
currently selected message as read, even though (1) that view was not
visible and (2) this was an internal rendering change that could not
be the first time the message was selected.
Because only the current message_list has marking messages as read
blocked, it's still able to mark the currently selected message as
read.
All the callers of reselect_selected_id are internal rendering code
paths that are not intended to be user-visible; as a result, they
should not change the unread state either.
The bug fixed here is a potential root cause of #16986, but I haven't
had a chacne to confirm it.
redo_selection and reselect_selected_id did the same thing: Reselect
the currently selected message as a result of internal rendering. I
combine the useful features of both -- not crashing if no message is
selected (id -1) and passing the `from_rendering` option, to avoid
potentially triggering an additional rerender.
We now first convert the element value to number using "Number()"
function and then call parseFloat in parse_time_limit function.
If we do not do so and the input element contains something like
"24a", it will be converted to 24 after parseFloat and will result
in an unexpected behavior where the save-discard widget will not
appear if the custom value input is changed from "24" to "24a",
since the value is considered as same as before.
But now "24a" will return NaN and save-discard widget will
appear with save button disabled.
Previously, typing something like "24aa" in message edit limit
custom input box would not disable the "Save changes" button
and clicking on it would set the limit to 24 minutes because
"24aa" was parsed to 24 by parseInt which is a valid value.
We now fix this to first convert the input to number using
"Number()" function and then use parseInt. "Number()" function
returns NaN for input like "24a" and other inputs containing
alphabet characters and thus it is considered as invalid value
and "Save changes" button is disabled.
Previously realm-level default of email notification batching period
setting was handled as a special case in populate_data_for_request.
But now we have added some functions to handle time limit settings and
this commit changes the email notification batching setting to be
handled similarly.
This commit renames get_message_edit_or_delete_limit_setting_value
function to get_time_limit_setting_value, so that we can use the
same function to get value for email notification batching setting
value.
Since set_msg_edit_limit_dropdown and set_msg_delete_limit_dropdown
have almost same code except the ID of elements, we extract a common
function set_time_limit_setting and both the above functions call
this new function only.
We can use this function for topic edit limit setting which will be
added in further commits.
We now show save-discard widget on changing the message edit and delete
limit setting dropdown from any value to "Custom" only after value inside
the custom input is changed. This makes sense as the setting value is
not actually changed unless the custom input is not changed and also
makes the behavior consistent with realm-level default of notification
batching period setting.
After this change, the dropdown element and custom input element are not
considered as different setting elements for code purposes and are
treated as single setting like the realm-level default of notification
batching period setting. And thus we remove the prop-element class
from the custom input elements of these settings.
This commit extracts a function to show or hide the custom
input of message edit and delete limit setting and to set
the initial value of custom input while showing it.
This commit changes time_limit_dropdown_values from map to
list like we have email_notifications_batching_period_values.
This change will help us in further commits for refactoring
the message edit and delete settings related code.
We change the id and name of message delete limit dropdown to
"id_realm_message_content_delete_limit_seconds" and
"realm_message_content_delete_limit_seconds" respectively.
This is a prep commit for sending only changed settings in
message editing section to the API.
We change the id and name of message edit limit dropdown to
"id_realm_message_content_edit_limit_seconds" and
"realm_message_content_edit_limit_seconds" respectively.
This is a prep commit for sending only changed settings in
message editing section to the API.
The implementation is simple, we just check if the
the message sender is a notification bot to decide if we
should show the read receipts list.
We also update the modal content styling to match the padding at the
top of the modal.
Fixes#22905
Since Django factors request.is_secure() into its CSRF check, we need
this to tell it to consider requests forwarded from nginx to Tornado
as secure.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Updates the help center article on 'Status and availability' to
describe invisible mode as a feature and removes all mentions of
the unavailable feature.
Fixes#21178.
Transitions the frontend of the web app to no longer use the
user status `away` field for setting a user's activity status
to be 'unavailable' (which is now a deprecated way to access
a user's `presence_enabled` setting).
Instead we now directly use and update the user's `presence_enabled`
setting for this feature.
Renames frontend code related to the feature to `invisible_mode`
vs `away`.
We lose node test coverage in `user_status.js` because we are now
using `channel.patch` to send these user setting updates to the
server.
Removes the temporary updates to `server_events_dispatch.py` (and
related tests) made in a previous commit, since we no longer have
or need the `away_user_ids` set.
Updates API documentation and changelog for user status `away`
now being a deprecated way to access a user's `presence_enabled`
setting for clients supporting older servers.
Final step in making user status `away` a deprecated way to access
`presence_enabled` for clients supporting older servers.
Part of transitioning from 'unavailable' user status feature to
'invisible mode' user presence feature.
We are no longer writing to or reading the UserStatus.status field,
so we delete that from the model.
Fifth step in making user status `away` a deprecated way to access
`presence_enabled` for clients supporting older servers.
Part of transitioning from 'unavailable' user status feature to
'invisible mode' user presence feature.
Fourth step in making user status `away` a deprecated way to access
`presence_enabled` for clients supporting older servers, and
checkpoint commit prior to deleting the `status` field from the
UserStatus model.
Part of transitioning from 'unavailable' user status feature to
'invisible mode' user presence feature.
Because the web app has the capacity to update the presence_enabled
user setting directly, we need to temporarily ensure that the
user profile popover is also updated to the correct text/value.
This can be removed once the web app client transitions to use
the presence_enabled setting for the 'invisible_mode' feature.
We stop sending the `away=True` based on the user's `UserStatus`
object having `status=AWAY`, and instead send that value if
`!presence_enabled` for the user.
Third step in making user status `away` a deprecated way to access
`presence_enabled` for clients supporting older servers.
Part of transitioning from 'unavailable' user status feature to
'invisible mode' user presence feature.
Now that user status updates with `away=True|False` also update the
user's presence_enabled setting, we do a migration so that users with
`UserStatus.status=AWAY` also have the presence_enabled setting as
False (`away=!presence_enabled`).
Second step in making user status away a deprecated way to access
presence_enabled for clients supporting older servers.
Part of transitioning from 'unavailable' user status feature to
'invisible mode' user presence feature.
When a user toggles a status update for `away=True|False`, we now update
their `presence_enabled` setting to match (`away!=presence_enabled`).
First step of making user status `away` updates a deprecated way to
access presence_enabled for clients supporting older servers, and
checkpoint commit before migrating users with a current UserStatus
of `status=AWAY` to have their `presence_enabled` set to `False`.
Note that when user status `away` is updated, we now send 4 events:
user_status, user_settings, presence, and update_global_notifications.
Also, this means that these updates change the UserPresence.status
value, which impacts the test for importing and exporting user
information.
Part of transitioning from 'unavailable' user status feature to
'invisible mode' user presence feature.
We need to move this function to a separate actions file specifically
for `user_status` because otherwise we will have a circular import
between `actions/user_settings.py` and `actions/presence.py` in an
upcoming commit.
Prep commit for migrating "unavailable" user status feature to
"invisible" user presence feature.
Rename functions that refer to "user_info" without a reference to
"status" to help clarify in the backend between UserPresence
and UserStatus models.
Prep commit for migrating "unavailable" user status feature to
"invisible" user presence feature.
Rename functions that refer to "status" without a reference to
"presence" to help clarify in the backend between UserPresence
and UserStatus models.
Prep commit for migrating "unavailable" user status feature to
"invisible" user presence feature.
"Add a new bot" tab from personal `settings > bots` moving this
into a modal form, so we can trigger this form from other places
too without duplicating the code.
Fixes part of #20309.
Previously, we deleted all reload tokens on each reload, which
created a race condition if there were multiple tabs open.
Now, we continue to delete tokens after using them, but if a
token is not used it is preserved for a week before being deleted.
Fixes#22832.
These are used for creating huddles and private messages (and some
UserPresence objects). It'd be really weird, and potentially create some
Messages that break our assumptions, for this to end up involving users
in multiple realms.
I believe currently this hasn't been happening, because when
this line runs, there are only users in "zulip" realm and system bots in
"zulipinternal" - but the query has been excluding bots already.
Still, this query should be explicit about grabbing users from a single
realm. This will also be helpful for the work adding the denormalized
Message.realm field - so that the realm of Message objects that get
manually created in generate_and_send_messages can be simply set to
"zulip" with confidence that it's correct.
This help center article should include more features rather than just
focusing on the "go to conversation" button. We should broaden and
restructure this page to cover other advanced features.
Refactors the "Go to conversation" section as step-by-step instructions,
and adds a `keyboard_tip`.
Adds new section "Toggle between Ctrl+Enter and Enter".
Deletes the "Enable Enter to send" help center article, and adds its
content as a new subheading in this section.
Updates existing links accordingly and adds a URL redirect.
Documents "Enable Control + Enter to send".
Tweaks intro paragraph of "Mastering the compose box".
Fixes: #22817.
Fixes#22821.
As explained in the comment in the code:
Topics can be large enough that this request will inevitably time out.
In such a case, it's good for some progress to be accomplished, so that
full deletion can be achieved by repeating the request. For that purpose,
we delete messages in atomic batches, committing after each batch.
The additional perk is that the ordering of messages should prevent some
hypothetical deadlocks - ref #19054
Taiki
Anders Kaseorg
Steve Howell
Tim Abbott
Sahil Batra
Riken Shah
Lauryn Menard
Yogesh Sirsat
evykassirer
Aman Agrawal
Matt Keller
Mateusz Mandera
David Rosa
Alya Abbott