This is a prep commit in preparation of splitting
create_stream_policy into create_private_stream_policy
and create_public_stream_policy.
This extracts it in a way to make it possible to easily test
different stream policies in the upcoming stream policy split.
This is a prep commit in preparation of splitting
create_stream_policy into create_private_stream_policy
and create_public_stream_policy.
This extracts it in a way to make it possible to easily test
different stream policies in the upcoming stream policy split.
test_create_stream_policy_setting (in class StreamAdminTest) and
test_user_settings_for_creating_streams (in class SubscriptionAPITest)
test essentially the same thing.
So, remove one of them.
Removing test_create_stream_policy_setting makes sense,
since class StreamAdminTest tests things admins can do, whereas
non-admin users can create streams.
test_invite_to_stream_by_invite_period_threshold (in class StreamAdminTest)
and test_user_settings_for_subscribing_other_users
(in class SubscriptionAPITest) test essentially the same thing.
So, remove one of them.
Removing test_invite_to_stream_by_invite_period_threshold makes sense,
since class StreamAdminTest tests things admins can do, whereas
non-admin users can invite other users.
This was used to test can_create_stream property of a guest user.
There are better ways to test it, which are already implemented in
test_can_create_streams.
We use the "does not accept any parameters" language in the common
template that we'll be migrating to shortly, so we remove this
variance (And adjust its test).
This removes some complexity from the event_queue module.
To avoid code duplication, we reduce the `is_notifiable` methods to
internally just call the `trigger` methods and check their return value.
* Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the
dataclass introduced in 951b49c048.
* The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way
which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've
earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e.
So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts
which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion.
* We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message
message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style.
* There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests.
Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted
(5a642cea11).
With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods.
So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was
muted, and the test needs to be updated.
* In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which
generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls,
we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments,
so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives.
* Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events,
we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment
there.
This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into
our new `notification_data` module.
This is a prep commit for adding realm-level default for various
user settings. We add the language, in which the invite email will
be sent, to the dict added to queue itself to avoid making queries
in a loop when sending multiple emails from queue.
We also handle the case for old events in the queue.
We removed the use of email_body field in 47fcb27e39, but was
still passed in events from do_resend_user_invite_email and
in tests. So this commit removes the email_body field from
these places.
We already have this data in the `flags` for each user, so no need to
send this set/list in the event dictionary.
The `flags` in the event dict represent the after-message-update state,
so we can't avoid sending `prior_mention_user_ids`.
Previously, it was possible for an unusual series of topic-edit
actions to result in Notification Bot reporting that a topic was
marked as resolved that had already been marked as resolved, etc.
A buggy client might send a message_edit request to change the topic
field, sending the current topic as the new value. Previously, we
would treat that as a normal request to edit the topic; now we act as
though the API request had not requested a topic change. In the
common case that only the topic was in the edit request, this now
results in an error that should help client implementations identify
their bug.
This fixes a bad interaction with the "unresolve topic" logic, which
assumed that upstream logic had verified that the topic was actually
changing.
* Have the `get_active_presence_idle_user_ids` function look at all the
user data, not just `private_message` and `mentioned`.
* Fix a couple of incorrect `missedmessage_hook` tests, which did not
catch the earlier behaviour.
* Add some comments to the tests for this function for clarity.
* Add a helper to create `UserMessageNotificationsData` objects from the
user ID lists. This will later help us deduplicate code in the event_queue
logic.
This fixes a bug which earlier existed, that if a user turned on stream
notifications, and received a message in that stream which did not mention
them, they wouldn't be in the `presence_idle_users` list, and hence would
never get notifications for that message.
Note that, after this commit, users might still not get notifications in
the above scenarios in some cases, because the downstream logic in the
notification queue consumers sometimes erroneously skips sending
notifications for stream messages.
We will later consistently use these functions to check for notifiable
messages in the message send and event_queue code.
We have these functions accept the `sender_id` so that we can avoid the
`private_message = message["type"] == "private" and user_id != sender_id`
wizardy.
This is separate from the next commit for ease of testing.
To verify that the compatibility code works correctly, all message send
and event_queue tests from our test suite should pass on just this commit.
The language_list_dbl_col parameter in the page_params
is used by only the web client frontend. The value is
calculated in the backend and then passed as a page_param
which is unnecessary considering that the whole process
is beneficial for the front_end only. Hence move the entire
calculation code to the frontend.
Fixes part of #18673.
default_language_name was a part of page_params which is actually
redundant considering that we already have language_list and
default_language available to frontend which can be used to
get the default_language_name and hence prevents the backend
from sending an additional parameter.
Fixes part of #18673.
We now validate the linkifier urls and patterns together, and add
the following additional checks:
1. All groups in the pattern must be used in the URL format string.
2. All groups in the URL format string must be declared in the pattern.
Linkifier pattern is now validated inside the `clean` method.
`filter_pattern_validator` is moved from `clean_fields` to `clean`
method as a safe check. As a result of this, a Puppeteer test case
is updated.
NOTE: The changes here are IN ADDITION to the existing validations.
Fixes#16482.
Co-authored-by: akshatdalton <akshat.dak@students.iiit.ac.in>
This is a prep commit for adding members, full members and moderator
options to edit_topic_policy. As we will be adding tests for these
options, we will need to add a login statment repeatedly and this
helps us in avoiding that.
This is a prep commit for adding moderators, full
members and member roles in edit_topic_policy.
As we add these new options, we will add tests with
user with all these roles and thus we would need to
login as iago repeatedly when changing parameters.
So, to avoid this we instead login as Iago in
set_message_editing_params itself.
This commit replaces the allow_community_topic_editing boolean with
integer field edit_topic_policy and includes both frontend and
backend changes.
We also update settings_ui.disable_sub_settings_onchange to not
change the color of label as we did previously when the setting
was a checkbox. But now as the setting is dropdown we keep the
label as it is and we don't do anything with label when disabling
dropdowns. Also, this function was used only here so we can safely
change this.
When an unauthenticated user tries to access the /plans page, we
redirect to /accounts/login/?next=plans (note the missing slash
before "plans"). After the user is authenticated, they are then
redirected to /accounts/login/plans, which is an invalid URL. The
correct URL should be just /plans.
This commit solves this by prefixing the "plans" in the query
parameter with a forward slash, which results in the correct
redirect URL, i.e., /plans.
For this extraction, we need to move some context
parameter (from home_real in `views/home.py`) to extra
page_params parameter (of
build_page_params_for_home_page_load in
`lib/home.py`) so handlebars template can access them.
While moving I confirmed that these parameters are not
used elsewhere if some parameter is used elsewhere
(like `apps_page_url`) then I didn't remove it from the
context list, I just added it to the page_params list.
Fixes: #18795.
This results in moving the `zulip_merge_base` parameter to
page_params, so that it's available to JavaScript.
Since this is technically a tiny overlay, it needs to be initialized
before hashchange.js.
These tests didn't configure ldap settings correctly and as a result,
the user involved in these tests wasn't actually hamlet@zulip.com, but a
new, malformed user with email "hamlet" that was being created by the
ldap auto-registration codepath. This wasn't caught because the codepath
didn't validate the email address and thus created such a malformed user
silently.
* In `event_queue.py`, only the sender and recipient users who have muted
the sender will have the "read" flag set.
* We already skip enqueueing notifications for users who've muted the sender
after 58da384da3.
* The queue consume functions for email and push notifications already
check filter messages which have been read before sending notifications.
* So, the "read" logic in `event_queue.py` is unnecessary, and the
processing power saved from not enqueueing notifications for a single
user should be insignificant, so we remove these checks all toghether.
This logic was peviously untested. This is a prep change for us
to completely depend on the logic here for the "read" flag, and
not on the `event_queue` code.
It was unclear what the original test was testing, and more
importantly, the test passed even if one removed the `read` flag
check in the `handle_push_notifications` function, so we fix it
to be more comprehensive.
This module deals with the testing of /activity, /realm_activity
and /user_activity. All these pages reside in analytics module.
Keeping these tests in zerver/tests is kind is not appropriate
since person who makes changes to /activity pages would not think
it is necessary to run tests in zerver. So better to keep them
in the analytics module.
Currently, in the FAQ on our /plans page, when the user clicks on
the sponsorship link in the answer for the first question, they
are always taken to /accounts/go, causing them to have to input
their organization URL even if they are on a subdomain page.
This commit makes it so that when the user is on a subdomain page,
they are taken to /upgrade#sponsorship directly. On the other
hand, when they are on a root domain (/) page, they have to go
through /accounts/go and specify their organization's name.
Ganesh Pawar
Suyash Vardhan Mathur
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
sahil839
Tim Abbott
Dinesh
Gaurav Pandey
Carlos Bederian
Rohitt Vashishtha
Riken Shah
Aman Agrawal
Eeshan Garg
Steve Howell
Vishnu KS
akshatdalton
Mateusz Mandera