The naive solution #23465 creates situations where the same user can have
multiple reactions as the base emojis are not unique, e.g. +1::skin2
and +1::skin4 would both reduce to +1 but the userlists are separate.
This solution handles the reduction, merges the same-base reactions,
and deduplicates the userlist.
Co-authored-by: Alex Vandiver <alexmv@zulip.com>
Co-authored-by: rht <rhtbot@protonmail.com>
return inside finally blocks causes exceptions to be silenced.
Although these blocks follow blanket ‘except Exception’ handlers, they
do not seem to have a goal of silencing BaseException and exceptions
thrown by the exception handler, so rewrite them to avoid it.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Both of these compatibility blocks can be deleted, since you can't
upgrade directly to any supported release from the versions where the
old event formats would be used.
This solves the problem that resolving a topic with a long name (>60
characters) will cause the topic name to be truncated, and thus the edit
message code path thinks that the topic is being moved in addition to
being resolved.
We store the pre-truncation topic and use it to check against the
original topic when determining whether a topic is being moved while
getting (un)resovled or not.
Fixes#23482
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We intended to send both the "topic was resolved" and the "topic was
moved here" notification when resolving and moving a topic at the same
time in #22312.
The previous implementation did not work as expected and it was only
sending the "topic was moved here" notification.
This removes the check for old_topic and new_topic that have
RESOLVED_TOPIC_PREFIX stripped in maybe_send_resolve_notifications, so
that the notification will be sent regardless if the topic name without
the prefix stays the same or not.
Note that weird topic handling ("✔ ✔✔ some topic") in the comments
was added in e231a03eff is unaffected. In case of confusion, the lstrip
check is not essential to detecting topic being unresolved/resolved.
As we mainly have that handled in the latter part of the helper.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
CircleCI has updated its webhook format[1] for CircleCI Cloud,
Server version 3.x and 4.x. This commit rewrites the CircleCI
integration to parse the new webhook structure. The tests have also
been rewritten for the new format.
With this commit, we support webhooks from projects that use GitHub,
BitBucket and GitLab as VCS providers. The CircleCI integration doc
has been updated to mention the same. The doc has also been updated
with the latest instructions for configuring a webhook on the CircleCI
interface, and the new output screenshots.
References:
[1]: https://circleci.com/docs/webhooks
Previously, emoji.json was read from
"$ZULIP_PATH/node_modules/emoji-datasource-google/emoji.json".
This path doesn't exist in production when installing from scratch from
a release tarball. And so, we ensure emoji.json exists by copying it to
`static/generated/emoji`.
With tweaks to comments by tabbott.
Fixes: #23469
This is a follow-up to d201229df8.
do_get_invites_controlled_by_user queries for Confirmations when finding
multiuse invites controlled by a user. This means that a revoked
multiuse invite cannot really be fetched here, because
do_revoke_multi_use_invite deletes the Confirmation object when revoking
the invitations. However, having a defensive assert here should be
useful to make this doesn't secretly break in the future if the query
used changes or if there are unexpected revoked multiuse invites with an
existing Confirmations for any (buggy) reason.
This allows us to revoke MultiUseInvites by changing their .status
instead of deleting them (which has been deleting the helpful tracking
information on PreregistrationUsers about which MultiUseInvite they came
from).
This commit adds support for Grafana's new alerting system, Grafana
Alerting. The existing Grafana integration has been modified to
detect the version of the notification through the structure of the
payload body, since the the structure varies by version. Support for
legacy alerting is been continued. Example fixtures have been added
for Grafana Alerting's webhooks.
Tests updated.
Fixes#23517.
While this feature was added to Zulip very early, it has been troubled
for most of that time; it never looked great visually, had a lot of
implementation complexity around resize.js, and has a weird model (a
setting that changes the UI only in certain window sizes).
This option is not commonly used; while a significant portion of users
have it enabled, many of them just don't use window sizes where it
actually has an effect. So it's not clear that it will be missed if
removed; we got very few bug reports when it was completely broken for
a few days after we first integrated the new left sidebar private
messages design.
Even with it no longer being broken, it does not work very well with
the addition of the new PMs section in the left sidebar. (Having two
scrollbars in the sidebar looks quite awkward.) The new private
messages section in the left sidebar also addresses some of the use
cases for always keeping the Users list always visible, even in narrow
windows.
This option is only removed from frontend for now. To make this
decision easily reversible, the backend code of this feature
is still kept.
This doesn't make sense if the realm is active and will fail as soon as
do_reactivate_realm is fixed in the next commit to be a noop and not
create confused RealmAuditLog entries when the realm is active.
There was the following bug here:
1. Send an email invite to a user.
2. Have the user sign up via social auth without going through that
invite, meaning either going via a multiuse invite link or just
straight-up Sign up if the org permissions allow.
That resulted in the PreregistrationUser that got generated in step (1)
having 2 Confirmations tied to it - because maybe_send_to_registration
grabbed the object and created a new confirmation link for it. That is a
corrupted state, Confirmation is supposed to be unique.
One could try to do fancy things with checking whether a
PreregistrationUser already have a Confirmation link, but to avoid races
between ConfirmationEmailWorker and maybe_send_to_registration, this
would require taking locks and so on - which gets needlessly
complicated. It's simpler to not have them compete for the same object.
The point of the PreregistrationUser re-use in
maybe_send_to_registration is that if an admin invites a user, setting
their initial streams and role, it'd be an annoying experience if the
user ends up signing up not via the invite and those initial streams
streams etc. don't get set up. But to handle this, we can just copy the
relevant values from the pre-existing prereg_user, rather than re-using
the object itself.
This line was added in 94e099eaab,
presumably because of the
del request.session["multiuse_object_key"]
line that was just above it.
Looks like it should have been removed in
868a763cec, which eliminated that `del`
operation.
This is primarily for administrators needing to provide message
history for compliance or auditing purposes. Search terms can be
pulled from a file, one per line, or from arguments provided on the
command line.
In 1fce1c3c73, we added logic to parse
the User-Agent in /register requests; this logic crashed if an HTTP request
was missing that header.
Includes a test for `/register` with no user agent passed; this should catch
similar regressions in the future.
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
Anders Kaseorg
M@
Tim Abbott
Hari Prashant Bhimaraju
Zixuan James Li
rht
Mateusz Mandera
Aman Agrawal
Lauryn Menard
Alex Vandiver