The actual implementation of the change will be a cron job that runs once a
day and generates invoices for anyone with an account_balance > 0.
There are currently no tests for that part of the flow, so no tests had to
change.
These test are for the handling of HipChat
sender info. The data formats are somewhat
inconsistent and sometimes require us to
generate "mirror" users, so this is potentially
fragile code if we don't cover it well.
We extract this function and put it in the shared
library `import_util.py`.
Also, we make it one time higher up in the call
stack, rather than re-building it for every batch
of messages. I doubt this was super expensive, but
there's no reason to repeatedly execute this.
Before this fix, we were creating two copies of every
PM Message in zerver_message with only corresponding
UserMessage row.
Now we only create one PM Message per message, which
we accomplish by making sure we only use imported
messages from the sender's history.json file. And
then we write UserMessage rows for both participants
by making sure to include sender_id in the set of
user_ids that feeds into making UserMessage. For
the case where you PM yourself, there's just one
UserMessage row.
It does not appear that we need to support huddles
yet.
When we create new ids for message rows, we
now sort the new ids by their corresponding
pub_date values in the rows.
This takes a sizable chunk of memory.
This feature only gets turned on if you
set sort_by_date to True in realm.json.
We could migrate all the current PREMIUM_FREE organizations to have more
invites, but this setting mainly affects orgs right as they are starting, so
it's probably fine.
We recently received a bug report that implied that for certain
payloads, the `requested_reviewers` key was empty whereas a
singular `requested_reviewer` key containing one reviewer's
information was present in its stead. Naturally, this raised
some not so pretty IndexError exceptions.
After some investigation and generating a few similar payloads,
I discovered that in every case both the `requested_reviewers`
and the `requested_reviewer` keys were correctly populated, so I
had to manually edit the payload to reproduce the error on my end.
My guess is that this anomaly goes back to when GitHub's reviewer
request feature was new and didn't support requesting multiple
reviewers, and that the singular `requested_reviewer` key could
possibly just be there for backwards compatibility or might just
be mere oversight. Either way, the solution here is to look for the
plural `requested_reviewers` key, and if that is empty, fall back
to the singular `requested_reviewer` key.
Fixes#10706.
Issue: Before this commit, the `refname` positional argument to
`upgrade-zulip-from-git` script would run successfully for a branch
name on the given remote, but the script would fail if it was
provided with a tag or commit ID.
Solution: 'git clone -q -b refname LOCAL_GIT_CACHE_DIR deploy_path`
would be split into two commands:
1.) `git clone -q LOCAL_GIT_CACHE_DIR deploy_path`
2.) `git checkout -b deploy_timestamp refname` which makes a new
branch with the same name as the timestamp used in make_deploy_path.
This fixes a regression from here:
88b4a9f2d7
The fix didn't account for how huddles are
represented as comma-delimited strings.
We also simplify the logic by extracting a
function and doing early-exit for simple
cases.
Internally we generally omit our own id and email
in data structures related to PMs, except when we
are the sender, but if we receive "perma links"
we will need to filter out our id.
Tweaked by tabbott to move most of the content into the remote
development documentation, both for brevity in the main docs as well
as clarity.
Fixes#10694.
Adds an optional argument `--remote-url` to specify the remote URL.
Command line remote URL will be given preference above the one
in /etc/zulip/zulip.conf.
Fixes#6092.
We seemed to have been doing too much of sharpening on the thumbnails.
The purpose of sharpening here was to just counter the softening
effects of a resize on an image but overdoing it is bad.
Value sharpen(0.5,0.2,true) seems to look good for achieving the
best results here on different displays as revealed in the manual
hit and trial based testing.
Thanks to @borisyankov for pointing out the issue and suggesting
the values.
This reflects the newly selected value of role in "role" column under
active-users section and deletes the redundant admin-icon updation code(
As we already removed bolt admin-icon)
For some webhook endpoints where the third-party API requires us to do
this, the user's API key might appear in error emails through
appearing in the `QUERY_STRING` parameter. Fix that by filtering any
actual content from those; what we usually need for debugging is just
what set of parameters were provided.
New user avatar width is not maximum when user upload
new image. Because wrong html element is accessed for
setting value of image src attribute.
This commit removes these code from success of ajax call,
cause we already handle this in event `user_events - avatar_url`.
Currently, if there is only one admin in realm and admin tries
to updates any non-adminuser's full name it throws error,
"Cannot remove only realm admin". Because in `/json/users/<user_id>`
api check_if_last_admin_is_changed is checked even if property
is_admin is not changed.
This commit fix this issue and add tests for it.
Rishi Gupta
Vishnu Ks
Steve Howell
Eeshan Garg
Shubham Padia
neiljp (Neil Pilgrim)
Scott Lee
Tim Abbott
Aditya Bansal
Pragati Agrawal
Aditya Ramesh
Yashashvi Dave
Anders Kaseorg