The production database will need to have this user created before
this commit is pushed
(imported from commit cc8356d8afa0f0747486b7b4c82337c60499d3fd)
We need this so that we can safely expunge old events without interfering with
the running server. See #414.
(imported from commit 4739e59e36ea69f877c158c13ee752bf6a2dacfe)
So that it is, in fact, navigable via keyboard shortcut. It's not the
most beautiful way to do this; in the ideal world the layout would be
more properly responsive and could fill up the screen for you when you
have the room for it.
The issue is that the version of Bootstrap we're running doesn't
easily allow for variable-sized modals, and the hassle of showing
and hiding a div manually didn't seem worth it.
The pixel sizes are specified manually as well, in a way that
isn't particularly responsive, because of a few competing
desires:
1) For them to appear side-by-side when wide enough
2) For them to stack when not wide enough
3) The fact that they're awkwardly between a span2 and a span3,
so we can't just use the Bootstrap responsive layout stuff
Finally, the diff here is best viewed with -w. (I also swapped the
order of Narrowing and Navigation, which unfortunately clutters the
diff.)
(imported from commit 62cfa7959d48ce515562713eb48f9d9b33c8cc16)
Before this is deployed, we need to install rabbitmq and pika on the
target server (see the puppet part of this commit for how).
When this is deployed, we need to start the new user activity bot:
./manage.py process_user_activity
in the screen session on the relevant server, or user_activity logs
won't be processed (which will eventually result in all users getting
notifications about how their mirrors are out of date).
(imported from commit 44d605aca0290bef2c94fb99267e15e26b21673b)
... so that I can send the user to a narrowed URL and even if they're
not logged in, after logging in, they will arrive at the intended URL.
Fixes trac ticket #662.
(imported from commit 1fe10883b181ba096596ec2b32daefd0fdfbc9c6)
I'd like to phase this out in favor of something you actually
see only when you don't use Tab-Enter, but that's more challenging
than I'm prepared to tackle right this second.
(imported from commit eeda53b0ed69d0e528b00ea9e7c7a20edb35df34)
If you're currently composing a message and you click one of those, it
now no longer clears out your old message contents, making it more
analogous to the job the old selector used to play.
(imported from commit b935a3bf307bdbd82f1ee7db31d3a3c89c623195)
Accomplished by:
- Hiding the stream/PM selector
- Eliminating the "tab to send" reminder
- Moving send and formatting links to the right
- Reducing the size of the 'subject' box
- Generally tightening up whitespace
To be fixed later in this series:
- A Tab-Enter reminder
- Completely eliminating the stream/PM selector
(imported from commit 7efe04adcbe373f99a36d3ba23b32944c17aa099)
internal_send_message now has the ability to send personals as well as
stream messages.
This change was accidentally lost during a rebase.
(imported from commit 153a3929c5c64be82288293c1f0cc02fcc03c08d)
Later, we can fork off a separate process to do that task, but for
now, we can just rely on the fact that unless the server was just
rebooted, the relevant messages will already be in that cache, and
even if it was, getting the needed messages once each is not a
particularly expensive query.
(imported from commit 6d08eba1b41237fd4e1204e181ce8f227573930d)
It can easily cost an entire line, and the information is available by
clicking on the sender's name. Plus on a phone, you can't hover
anyways.
Annoyingly, this tends to put the popover partly off the window, but
there must be a way to fix that separately.
(imported from commit 19334cb067981b323e300245654c83c8e545fb2e)
It's possible for selected_message_id to not exist in zhome. For
instance, when you open the page to a narrowed URL, there is a race
between loading the narrowed messages and loading all your
messages. If the narrowed message request completes first, it will
update selected_message_id to your initial_pointer if the latter
happens to be among the narrowed messages. Even if it is not, you can
select a message by clicking on it before the zhome request finishes.
Then the old code would never add that selected_message_id to the
zhome table, so it wouldn't show up in the Home view or if you
re-narrowed.
I'm pretty sure there are still cases where the selected_message_id
might be outside the range of messages in zhome, in which case adding
to zhome might put old messages at the bottom. I observed this twice
on staging but was unable to reproduce it consistently.
(imported from commit 162feff3090f8806cc67140db0cfabb6e965aece)
The schema change made this no longer a guarantee, and creating duplicate
PUs is not harmful.
(imported from commit ca05b4dad7d3cc12a35548817f98c0a072c14c8f)
This involved splitting off into a separate function the second step of
the two-step registration process.
(imported from commit bd1ec9b5abb15d29b0585873daaa54a8d4e26556)
Added field invited_at on zephyr.PreregistrationUser, with a one-time
default of Jan 1, 1970 for existing objects.
Added M2M table for streams on zephyr.PreregistrationUser
Deleted unique constraint for ['email'] on zephyr.PreregistrationUser
(imported from commit 85247acb488201f8fc51dfaae354423c27eddcb0)
This allows us to handle the return_messages_immediately part of
get_updates requests without having to talk to the database.
(imported from commit ed0b7742d359efb21a0a4960f4fc25f4337e9ad4)
This commit has the effect of eliminating all of the non-UserActivity
database queries from the Tornado process -- at least in the uncached
case.
This is safe to do, if a bit fragile, since our Tornado code only
accesses these objects (as opposed to their IDs) in a few places that
are all fine with old data, and I don't expect us to add any new ones
soon:
* UserActivity logging, which I plan to move out of Tornado entirely
* Checking whether we're authenticated in our decorators (which could
be simplified -- the actual security check is just whether the
Django session object has a particular field)
* Checking the user realm for whether we should sync to the client
notices about their Zephyr mirror being up to date, which is quite
static and I think we can move out of this code path.
But implementation constraints around mapping the user_ids to
user_profile_ids mean that it makes sense to get the actual objects
for now.
This code is not what I want to do long-term. I expect we'll be able
to clean up the dual User/UserProfile nonsense once we integrate the
upcoming Django 1.5 release, with its support for pluggable User
models, and after that I change, I expect it'll be fairly easy to make
the Tornado code only work with the user ID, not the actual objects.
(imported from commit 82e25b62fd0e3af7c86040600c63a4deec7bec06)
Zev Benjamin
Keegan McAllister
Waseem Daher
Tim Abbott
Jeff Arnold
Reid Barton
Luke Faraone
Jessica McKellar