We were going back to the database to get all
the users in the realm, when we had them right
there already. I believe this is a legacy
of us running on a very old version of Django
(back in early days), where `bulk_create`
didn't give you back ids in a nice way.
In the interim we added the `RealmAuditLog`
code, which does take advantage of the
existing profiles (and proves we can rely
on them).
But meanwhile we were still
doing a query to get all N users in the
realm. With `selected_related`!
To be fair, bulk_create_users() is by
its very nature a pretty infrequent
operation. This change is more motivated
by code cleanup.
Now we just loop through user_ids for
the Recipient/Subscriber foreign key rows.
I also removed some fairly convoluted code mapping
emails to user_ids and just work in user_id
space.
This commit includes a new `stream_post_policy` setting,
by replacing the `is_announcement_only` field from the Stream model,
which is done by mirroring the structure of the existing
`create_stream_policy`.
It includes the necessary schema and database migrations to migrate
the is_announcement_only boolean field to stream_post_policy,
a smallPositiveInteger field similar to many other settings.
This change is done to allow organization administrators to restrict
new members from creating and posting to a stream. However, this does
not affect admins who are new members.
With many tweaks by tabbott to documentation under /help, etc.
Fixes#13616.
This is adds foreign keys to the corresponding Recipient object in the
UserProfile on Stream tables, a denormalization intended to improve
performance as this is a common query.
In the migration for setting the field correctly for existing users,
we do a direct SQL query (because Django 1.11 doesn't provide any good
method for doing it properly in bulk using the ORM.).
A consequence of this change to the model is that a bit of code needs
to be added to the functions responsible for creating new users (to
set the field after the Recipient object gets created). Fortunately,
there's only a few code paths for doing that.
Also an adjustment is needed in the import system - this introduces a
circular relation between Recipient and UserProfile. The field cannot be
set until the Recipient objects have been created, but UserProfiles need
to be created before their corresponding Recipients. We deal with this
by first importing UserProfiles same way as before, but we leave the
personal_recipient field uninitialized. After creating the Recipient
objects, we call a function to set the field for all the imported users
in bulk.
A similar change is made for managing Stream objects.
In commit de65a04 we can see that if the need ever arises to modify
how stream descriptions are rendered, we would need to make changes
at 5 different call points which can be quite cumbersome. So this
functionality has been extracted to a new method called
'render_stream_descriptions'.
We want to use the baseline features of bugdown, but not fancy things
like inline URL previews, since the whole structure of stream
descriptions is to have a single-line thing supporting some
formatting.
The migration part of this change fixes a bug encountered by some
organizations upgrading from older versions of Zulip.
This causes changing the email_address_visibility field to actually
modify what user_profile.email values are generated for users, both on
user creation and afterwards as email addresses are edited.
The overall feature isn't yet complete, but this brings us pretty close.
This commit does the following three things:
1. Update stream model to accomodate rendered description.
2. Render and save the stream rendered description on update.
3. Render and save stream descriptions on creation.
Further, the stream's rendered description is also sent whenever the
stream's description is being sent.
This is preparatory work for eliminating the use of the
non-authoritative marked.js markdown parser for stream descriptions.
Makes announce stream `is_announcement_only` for the dev db for easier
manual testing. The default value for `is_announcement_only` in
`bulk_create_streams` is False.
We flip the Stream "Rome" to be a web public stream. Also we add
attribute is_web_public in various stream dicts and in the
bulk_create_streams function of bulk_create.py responsible for
default stream creation in dev environment.
This buggy logic from e1686f427c had
broken do-destroy-rebuild-test-database.
Now that we're not just trying to add the Recipient objects for every
user on the system here to profiles_by_id, we also shouldn't be
processing every Recipeint object on the system. The fix is simple:
because of the patch we got merged into Django upstream,
recipients_to_create actually has the object IDs added to the
Recipient objects passed into Recipient.objects.bulk_create.
This was missed in manual testing, since it only broke `populate_db
--test-suite`.
Add this field to the Stream model will prevent us from having
to look at realm data for several types of stream operations, which
can be prone to either doing extra database lookups or making
our cached data bloated.
Going forward, we'll set stream.is_zephyr to True whenever the
realm's string id is "zephyr".
This is required for test fixtures which contain `stream_id`. Prior
to python 3.3 hashes were not randomized but after a security fix
hash randomization was enabled by default in python 3.3 which made
iteration of dictionaries and sets completely unpredictable.
First step in cleaning up populate_db.create_streams and
bulk_create.bulk_create_streams. Part of a series of commits to remove
Realm.domain from populate_db.
bulk_create.bulk_create_users is only called by initialize_voyager_db.py and
populate_db.py, both of which only have realms with single domains.
Part of a larger project to remove the Realm.domain field.
Previously, the UserProfile objects were created in the order
generated by a Set, which meant tests would randomly start failing if
the code that runs before this part of populate_db changed (and thus
caused the Set object used to pass users into bulk_create_users to
have a different order when enumerated).
This fixes the issue in two ways -- one by sorting the users inside
bulk_create_users, and second by attaching subscriptions to users
based on a deterministic ordering.
Now that we support email aliases, we have to be careful when going from
an email address to a domain that we assume we can use to get a Realm
object for. When we care about the Realm's domain, we want to follow
any RealmAliases that exist for a certain domain.
When we just care about the original email address domain itself,
for comparison or other purposes, use split_email_from_domain
This removes the ambiguity of having to decide when to use
email_to_domain + RealmAlias or just email_to_domain
(imported from commit 0e199495502d946ce2e1aae56263e7e8665be4ed)