This should help reduce the risk of hitting rate limits when users
have a very large number of messages to fetch via this mechanism.
Inline the `messages` variable that was only used in one place while
we're touching this.
(cherry picked from commit 8f32ebe706)
This will prevent any message we want to select after narrowing
from being offscreen entirely or partially.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
* `./manage.py populate_db -n 3000 --max-topics=2`
* Narrow to a stream and scroll high up.
* Align two recipient bars together with nothing between them.
* Click on the first recipient bar after keeping the selected message
on the second recipient bar.
* You will see that the selected message is not in view.
(cherry picked from commit 120ff78516)
As discussed in the new comments, we had a bug where the
system-initiated animated scroll that happens when the compose box
opens as a result of narrowing would race with the internal
rerendering that occurs when the message_fetch request asking the
server for additional data returns.
The correct fix for this is just to open the compose box, if we're
going to do so, before setting the user's scroll position in the
narrowing/rendering process.
This ends up being a UI improvement (in that the compose box is
available for typing a bit earlier) as well as avoiding both the risk
of this race as well as the bad UX of adjusting the user's scroll
position multiple times as part of entering the view.
This does not address an as-yet-unknown bug wherein the animated
scroll that occurs when opening the compose box, when racing with a
background rerender, results in a bogus ending scroll position, though
it's easy to see how that might occur given that rerendering does
clear the DOM briefly.
(cherry picked from commit 4e2a282a1b)
Earlier, the tests for compose formatting were verbose, hard to read as
well as extend, and overly granular, without even having the ability to
test the final text selection or the cursor position.
Now, new test helpers, `init_textarea_state` and `get_textarea_state`,
have been added, enabling the tests to be more concise and readable,
while also being more powerful. A representative string alone now
describes the textarea state (the text and the selection / cursor),
making each test case as easy as defining the initial state as a string
and comparing the expected state post formatting with another string.
These new tests helped surface a couple bugs which have been fixed in
preceding commits.
(cherry picked from commit 179e9374b4)
We previously allowed adding pills for inaccessible user by typing
the email manually. This commit updates it to handle inaccessible
users like we handle invalid emails.
(cherry picked from commit 9197a2c3e2)
Some files already were using `noop` in place of `() => {}`.
It's both clearer what it means and is easier to type.
This updates all test files to fully use `noop`, and
adds a shared import from the test lib file.
The "user_group_name_dict" value for the old group name key
was not deleted and this led to a bug where the stream creation
UI was incorrectly showing about a user group already existing
with the old group name.
Fixes#28108.
This commit adds code to not show typing notifications for inaccessible
users as the user would not have any information even if we show them
as the name shown would be "Unknown user".
Inaccessible user names are shown as "Unknown user" in the
reacted users list and tooltip.
This commit removes the call to `is_known_user_id` since we
may have reactions data from inaccessible users. And it is
fine to remove the `is_known_user_id` call anyways, because
it was added to ignore showing reactions from deactivated
users when the client did not have data about them, but now
the client has data about deactivated users.
So we anyways do not expect unknown user IDs in cases
other than inaccessible users for which we have to show
the reactions by showing their name as "Unknown user".
This commit also updates the comment for "is_known_user_id"
function accordingly.
We do not update the name for mention pills of inaccessible users
and keep it same as it was in the message content, and we show
the "Unknown user" popover on clicking the pill.
This commit sets the client capability value to not pass
unknown users data in the webapp and also does some changes
to avoid errors while loading the web-app home page.
This commit only does some basic webapp changes to not show
inaccessible users in sidebar and we would need need more
changes to make the web-app work as expected which will be
done in further commits.
The "User groups" panel is now removed from settings overlay
and we instead use new "#groups" UI.
This commit also makes some changes to tests to ensure coverage
for pill_typeahead.js which was previously done by
settings_user_group_legacy.test.js. We have still not got
complete coverage on user_pill.ts as we have removed
settings_user_group_legacy.test.js, but we just add the file
to EXEMPT_FILS list for now and will handle it in future.
Fixes#28012.
Earlier, the event sent when an onboarding step (hotspot till now)
is marked as read generated an event with type='hotspots' and
'hotspots' named array in it.
This commit renames the type to 'onboarding_steps' and the array
to 'onboarding_steps' to reflect the fact that it'll also contain
data for elements other than hotspots.
We have already fixed the actual bugs that were resulting in client
receiving presence data for unknown user, so we can remove the
blueslip logging and just skip the unknown users.
To extend the drag and drop upload area to blank areas after sidebars,
we now detect the drag/drop event on the entire ".app" division.
We also change replace `width` and `height` css properties with
`min-width` and `min-height` properties respectively, to make sure
that the ".app" div spans the entire width and height of the viewport.
Fixes: #27550.
When a user is replying to a message while in a search view, we now warn
them that the full conversation is not visible and urge them to go to
the conversation they are composing to, so they can see the complete
conversation. On narrowing to that conversation, the banner is removed.
Fixes: #25893.
This fixes a very rare exception seen in production, which the
previous assertion allowed us to understand was possible in a rare
race, now documented in comments.
Earlier, when a topic had less than 15 participants,
the @-topic typeahead was not visible. It should be visible
irrespective of the 'realm_wildcard_mention_policy' setting
when the participant count is not greater than 15.
The participant count for a topic can't always be calculated
accurately in the client as some of the messages might still
be loading.
We show @-topic in the typeahead whenever it might be possible
to use it.
We will give an error later if you aren't allowed to use it.
Fixes#27852.
This prep commit renames:
* 'stream_wildcard_mention_allowed_in_large_stream' to
'wildcard_mention_policy_authorizes_user' because the function
checks if the sender is allowed to use wildcard mentions based
on the 'wildcard_mention_policy' setting, and we plan to use that
for topic wildcard mentions too.
* 'stream_wildcard_mention_large_stream_threshold' to
'wildcard_mention_threshold' because this value is going to be
used as a threshold value for the max number of subscribers and
participant count allowed for stream and topic wildcard mention
respectively.
Earlier, for the desktop notifications having latex math
like "$$1 \oplus 0 = 1$$, the notification had the math
included multiple times.
This commit fixes the incorrect behavior by replacing
the KaTeX with the raw LaTeX source.
Fixes#25289.
This commit introduces non-intro hotspots.
They are a bit different than intro hotspots in the
following ways:
* All the non-intro hotspots are sent at once instead of
sending them one by one like intro hotspots.
* They only activate when a specific event occurs,
unlike intro hotspot where they activate after the
previous hotspot is read.
Rules followed:
1. Bold and highlighted background if the mention was processed
as a mention that includes you.
2. Bold personal mention (but not highlighted) if you were mentioned
but not subscribed at the time.
3. Otherwise not bold, no highlighting.
As we plan to keep the mention pill CSS the same if a user
was mentioned via that personal/wildcard/usergroup mention
irrespective of whether the user is subscribed or not, we use
usermessage flags to determine when to add 'user-mention-me' class.
Fixes#27654.
Now, the topic wildcard mention follows the following
rules:
* If the topic has less than 15 participants , anyone
can use @ topic mentions.
* For more than 15, the org setting 'wildcard_mention_policy'
determines who can use @ topic mentions.
Earlier, topic wildcard mentions followed the same restriction
as stream wildcard mentions, which was incorrect.
Fixes part of #27700.
We simplify the banner message by replacing the
"stream wildcard mentions" text with `"@stream mentions`,
`"@-all mentions"`, or `"@-everyone mentions"` text.
Tim Abbott
Aman Agrawal
N-Shar-ma
Sahil Batra
Anders Kaseorg
Evy Kassirer
Vector73
Prakhar Pratyush
Sayam Samal
evykassirer
Riken Shah