Our seat count calculation is different for guest user than normal users
(a number of initial guests are free, and additional marginal guests are
worth 1/5 of a seat) - so these checks we apply when a user is being
invited or signing up need to know whether it's a guest or non-guest
being added.
This is a simple generalization of get_latest_seat_count and is useful
for calculating "what will be the realm's license count if this
number of (guest) users is added?" without duplicating any of the math
logic. Will be used in the next commits.
Our billing FAQ says:
"For an organization with N other users, 5*N guest users are included at
no extra charge. After that, you will be charged at 1/5 of your regular
per-user pricing for each additional guest.".
It wasn't quite intuitive to me that
max(non_guests, math.ceil(guests / 5)) achieves that pricing, so it's
worth mentioning in a comment that it does and that that's why that
formula is used.
`extra_data` as a `TextField` expects a `str`, but we had been passing
`dict` instead. This is a temporary solution before #18391 to fix the
type annotation.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
When being called, the wrapped function is passed `PaymentIntent`
(the `content_object` of `Event`). With that, since `customer` can be
`None`, an assertion is also required.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This is an unused argument. We removed it so that we don't
need to create a `TypedDict` and unpack it when calling
the test client methods.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Since `HttpResponse` is an inaccurate representation of the
monkey-patched response object returned by the Django test client, we
replace it with `_MonkeyPatchedWSGIResponse` as `TestHttpResponse`.
This replaces `HttpResponse` in zerver/tests, analytics/tests, coporate/tests,
zerver/lib/test_classes.py, and zerver/lib/test_helpers.py with
`TestHttpResponse`. Several files in zerver/tests are excluded
from this substitution.
This commit is auto-generated by a script, with manual adjustments on certain
files squashed into it.
This is a part of the django-stubs refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Adds request as a parameter to json_success as a refactor towards
making `ignored_parameters_unsupported` functionality available
for all API endpoints.
Also, removes any data parameters that are an empty dict or
a dict with the generic success response values.
Given that these values are uuids, it's better to use UUIDField which is
meant for exactly that, rather than an arbitrary CharField.
This requires modifying some tests to use valid uuids.
Now that we pass in the UserProfile.id in the metadata to Stripe's
PaymentIntent objects, we no longer need to retrieve the user via
delivery_email. It makes more sense to just fetch the user by ID
and then get the latest delivery_email directly.
Note that an update to Stripe's fixtures is not necessary here
since a previous commit already modified the metadata passed to
both stripe.Session/PaymentIntent objects.
Previously, our Stripe webhook event handler code retrieved the
user's email from Stripe using the stripe.Customer.email attribute.
This led to situations such that whenever the email that Stripe had
did not correspond to a UserProfile in Zulip, the payment flow
failed since we couldn't find a UserProfile associated with the
given email.
Now, we pass in the UserProfile.id in the metadata to Stripe's
checkout Session object, so that we can fetch the correct email
in future Stripe requests.
After the Stripe migration to the hosted checkout page, we were
missing one fixture for the test for switching from Standard to
Plus. This commit updates the fixtures for that particular test.
This is a follow-up to #19752. The tests in that PR did not verify
that the financial math involved worked properly. This commit
improves the existing tests and adds new fixtures to make sure
that the financial math works as expected.
It is confusing to have the plan type constants not be namespaced
by the thing they represent. We already have a namespacing
convention in place for constants, so we should use it for
Realm.plan_type as well.
compute_plan_parameters assumed that the value of
tier is always CustomerPlan.STANDARD. We change that behavior
to make the function handle CustomerPlan.PLUS as well.
We ran into a bug in production caused by two issues:
- Some users came from orgs that didn't have a website and since
the URL field was required, they submitted invalid URLs.
- We didn't properly respond to invalid form submissions, which
led to UnboundLocalError exceptions in another part of the
code.
This commit solves this by doing the following:
- We now allow blank URLs and have a convenient placeholder text
label that tells users that they may leave the URL field blank.
- This commit refactors the code such that invalid form submissions
result in an informative error message about what exactly went
wrong.
These changes are all independent of each other; I just didn’t feel
like making dozens of commits for them.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The locally defined NamedTuple was triggering a mypy caching bug
(https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/10913), and we don’t use the
tuple behavior anyway.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
When calling some functions or assigning values to certain attributes,
the arguments/right operand do not match the exact type that the
functions/attributes expect, and thus we fix that by converting types
beforehand.
This fixes a batch of mypy errors of the following format:
'Item "None" of "Optional[Something]" has no attribute "abc"
Since we have already been recklessly using these attritbutes
in the tests, adding assertions beforehand is justified presuming
that they oughtn't to be None.
This upgrades the Stripe API to the most recent version. Going through
the Git history, it looks like our current API version is at 2019-03-14.
The API version should be manually changed in Stripe dashboard at the same
time as the commit is deployed in production.
Backward incompatible changes that are relevant to our codebase between
(2019-03-14, 2020-08-27].
* 2020-08-27 - The `sources` property on Customers is no longer included by
default.
* 2020-03-02 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-12-03 - The `id` field of all invoice line items have changed and are
now prefixed
with `il_`. We only rely on this while we normalize the fixtures.
* 2019-11-05 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-10-17 - The `billing` attribute on invoices, subscriptions, and
subscription schedules is renamed to`collection_method`. The invoice
change is the one that is relevant to us.
* The customer object’s `account_balance` value has been renamed to
`balance`. Only used for the stubs at the moment.
* 2019-10-08 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-09-09 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-08-14 - Nothing applicable
* 2019-05-16 - Nothing applicable
https://stripe.com/docs/upgrades
Also normalize the following IDs in stripe fixtures
* price_[A-Za-z0-9]{24}
* prod_[A-Za-z0-9]{14}
* pi_[A-Za-z0-9]{24}
* il_[A-Za-z0-9]{24}
Previously, we only downgraded and voided small organizations behind
payments only if they had an active plan.
This left us with a bunch of invoices from small realms which used to
have an active plan. It doesn't make much sense for us to get these
realms to pay the invoices so we have decided to just void them. This
commit voids the open invoices of all the small realms without an active
plan and has the last invoice open. Unlike, the realms with an active
plan we don't email them about us voiding the invoice. It's not super
obvious whether Stripe sends an email to the customer when the Invoice
is voided. But they do get the message that the invoice is voided if
they try to pay the invoice through the hosted invoice page.
This avoid some duplicate code as well as improve the readability since
before we were checking for the expected values far away from the
definition of realm. Now we define the expected values right after the
realm definition which improves the code readability.
Also, this get removes the postfixing of realm variable names with numbers.
The postfixing is kind of mess since if we want add any new realm in between
the realms we need to renumber a lot of realm variables.
An additional check for whether customer.stripe_customer_id is
None is added to the function. That check was not really required before
since all the customers with a plan also have a valid value for
stripe_customer_id. So all the calls to stripe.Invoice.list would have
non None value for customer argument.
Even though that is the case, mypy should still have complained about
the possibility of customer.stripe_customer_id being None when passed to
stripe.Invoice.list as customer paramater since mypy don't know that
customers with a plan will always have a non empty value for
stripe_customer_id. Our stripe stubs expect a non empty value for
the customer parameter of stripe.Invoice.list. This is despite the
fact that stripe.Invoice.list can actually be called with customer set
to None. This returns the invoices from the entire organization.
Though, we still decided to ensure that the value of customer should be
non empty since there is no reason for us to ever call this function
with customer set to None. You can just call the function wuthout the
customer argument instead. So this requirement of a non None customer
paramater is useful for catching bugs.
The reason mypy didn't complain was because the type of
Customer.objects.all() is Any and not QuerySet[Customer]. So mypy has no
idea that customer.stripe_customer_id can be theoratically None even
though it was not possible in this [articular case as explained before.
I verified that this was the reason mypy didn't complain by using the
reveal_type function on Customer.objects.all() and the customer object.
After the refactoring it's super to obvious to mypy that the type of the
customer is Customer since it's mentioned in the function defintion. So it
was able to complain about the possibility of customer.stripe_customer_id
being None after the refactoring.
This is a prep commit for the Stripe checkout migration.
The Stripe migration commit adds a lot of new view functions. Keeping
all of the views in one view file makes it super hard for readbability.
So creating a new views folder and splitting the existing view file into
two so that we minimize the changes in the big migration commit.
This makes sure that organizations as tagged with the user-volunteered
organization type in the sponsorship request, in the event that it
differs from what was entered during realm creation.
This makes several changes:
* Fixes a bug where the help text explaining our policies was not displayed.
* No help text was defined for many organization types.
* Copy-edits the help text somewhat.
* Offers all of the organization type options.
* Removes the 100% coverage requirement because it's annoying to test
the e.currentTarget click handler.
We are starting to run into situations where this data could be
quite useful for making future decisions, so it makes to store it
in the database, not just in an email.
This function had a confusing name, which could result in someone
using it unintentionally when they meant do_reactivate_user.
We also add docstrings for both functions.
This should have been in https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/18066.
The reason, the tests were not failing inspite of the params being
json encoded was because pretty much all these tests did not test
the functionality of the endpoint. Rather they were testing things
like whether the user has the right to access the endpoint and all.
So the value of the params did not matter.
The only one test which is an exception is test_replace_payment_source.
Even though a json encoded token was passed to an endpoint that
expecteda string, the test continued to work becausethe fixtures were
not updated for the test in that PR, so instead of sending an incorrect
json encoded token to stripe endpoint it was sending the correct string
token. Now that we removed the json.dumps of token, we no longer have to
update the fixtures.
I have run the tests with --generate-stripe-fixtures set to True and all
the tests are passing. Not including the fixture changes since the tests
conntinue to work the same with both the existing and new fixtures.
Billing system uses delivery_email instead of email. We used to make
the email address visible to everyone in tests which means the value
of email and delivery_email is the same. This commit disables that
so that we can distinguish between email and delivery_email in tests.
An organization with at most 5 users that is behind on payments isn't
worth spending time on investigating the situation.
For larger organizations, we likely want somewhat different logic that
at least does not void invoices.
stripe.Invoice.list by default would only get 10 invoices at a
time. So a function like this would be really handy if we have
to go through a lot of invoices.
This also means void_all_open_invoices used to void only the last
10 invoices. The main reason we implemented this function was to
void the invoices generated by realms on free trial so I don't
think there were cases where we had to void realms with more than
10 invoices.
This also fixes a bug in void_all_open_invoices function. If a realm
with a local Customer object but without an associated stripe.Customer
is passed to void_all_open_invoices, then the function will end up
voiding the last 10 invoices created by billing system instead of voiding
no invoices at all. This is because stripe.Invoice.list(customer=None)
return last 10 invoices across all customers.
But this bug won't cauuse any issue in production since
void_all_open_invoices can be only invoked from /support page. And we
show the option to void invoices in support page only if the realm
has a paid plan. And it's not really possible for a realm to have
a paid plan without having an associated stripe_customer_id. Plus I
went through the void events in stripe stream since the PR to add
void invoices was merged and there does not seems to be any suspicious
events.
JsonableError has two major benefits over json_error:
* It can be raised from anywhere in the codebase, rather than
being a return value, which is much more convenient for refactoring,
as one doesn't potentially need to change error handling style when
extracting a bit of view code to a function.
* It is guaranteed to contain the `code` property, which is helpful
for API consistency.
Various stragglers are not updated because JsonableError requires
subclassing in order to specify custom data or HTTP status codes.
Mateusz Mandera
Zixuan James Li
Anders Kaseorg
Zixuan James Li
Aman Agrawal
Lauryn Menard
Eeshan Garg
Vishnu KS
Tim Abbott