This commit updates code, majorly in tests, to use
setting values from enums instead of directly using
the constants defined in Realm.
We still have those constants defined Realm as they
are used in a couple of places where the same code
is used for different settings. These will be
handled later.
The naming `uri` is deprecated while `url` should be used in order to
satisfy URL standards. For this reason, four endpoints are affected:
* The response content of three endpoints `/server_settings`,
`/register` and `/realm` that contain a field `realm_uri` is
changed to `realm_url`.
* In one of the common fields for all mobile push notifications payloads,
`realm_url` field is now added as an alias to `realm_uri`.
For backwards compatibility, we keep the field `realm_uri` and add
an alias `realm_url`.
Co-authored-by: Junyao Chen <junyao.chen@socitydao.org>
In #23380, we are changing all occurrences of uri with url in order to
follow the latest URL standard. Previous PRs #25038 and #25045 has
replaced the occurences of uri that has no direct relation with realm.
This commit changes just the model property, which has no API
compatibility concerns.
Only affects zulipchat, by being based on the BILLING_ENABLED setting.
The restricted backends in this commit are
- AzureAD - restricted to Standard plan
- SAML - restricted to Plus plan, although it was already practically
restricted due to requiring server-side configuration to be done by us
This restriction is placed upon **enabling** a backend - so
organizations that already have a backend enabled, will continue to be
able to use it. This allows us to make exceptions and enable a backend
for an org manually via the shell, and to grandfather organizations into
keeping the backend they have been relying on.
This commit adds a realm-level setting named
'zulip_update_announcements_stream' that configures the
stream to which zulip updates should be posted.
Fixes part of #28604.
This commit renames the realm-level setting
'signup_notifications_stream' to 'signup_announcements_stream'.
The new name reflects better what the setting does.
This commit renames the realm-level setting 'notifications_stream'
to 'new_stream_announcements_stream'.
The new name reflects better what the setting does.
The widening of the time between when a process is marked for
reload (at Tornado startup) and when it sends reload events makes it
unlikely-to-impossible that a single `/` request will span both of
them, and thus hit the WebReloadClientError corner case.
Remove it, as it is not worth the complication. The bad behaviour it
is attempting to prevent (of a reload right after opening `/`) was
always still possible -- if the `/` request completed right before
Tornado restarted -- so it is not clear that it was ever worth the
complication.
This is preparatory work towards adding a Topic model.
We plan to use the local variable name as 'topic' for
the Topic model objects.
Currently, we use *topic as the local variable name for
topic names.
We rename local variables of the form *topic to *topic_name
so that we don't need to think about type collisions in
individual code paths where we might want to talk about both
Topic objects and strings for the topic name.
Earlier, the event sent when an onboarding step (hotspot till now)
is marked as read generated an event with type='hotspots' and
'hotspots' named array in it.
This commit renames the type to 'onboarding_steps' and the array
to 'onboarding_steps' to reflect the fact that it'll also contain
data for elements other than hotspots.
We did not remove the objects for deactivated streams from
subscriptions field in apply_event. We need to do this because
we do not send "subscription/remove" events to subscribers
when deactivating streams.
Guests might lose access to deactivated users if the user
is not involved in any DM with guest. This commit adds
code to send "realm_user/remove" events for such cases.
This commit adds code to send "realm_user/remove" event
when a guest user loses access to a user due to the user
being unsubscribed from one or more streams.
The presence and user status update events are only sent to accessible
users, i.e. guests do not receive presence and user status updates for
users they cannot access.
This commit adds code to send stream deletion events when
unsubscribing non-admin users from private streams and
when unsubscribing guests from public streams since
non-admins cannot access unsubscribed private streams
and guests cannot access unsubscribed public streams.
It was discovered by the Zulip development team that active users who
had previously been subscribed to a stream incorrectly continued being
able to use the Zulip API to access metadata for that stream. As a
result, users who had been removed from a stream, but still had an
account in the organization, could still view metadata for that
stream (including the stream name, description, settings, and an email
address used to send emails into the stream via the incoming email
integration). This potentially allowed users to see changes to a
stream’s metadata after they had lost access to the stream.
This bug was present in all Zulip releases prior to today's Zulip
Server 7.5.
This is a prep commit for adding feature of restricting
user access to guests such that we can keep the code
easy to read and understand when that feature is added.
We now send "realm_user/update" (and "realm_bot/update" for bots)
events with "is_active" field when deactivating and reactivating
users, including bots.
We would want to use "remove" event for a user losing access
to another user for #10970, so it is better to use "update"
event for deactivation as we only update "is_active" field
in the user objects and the clients still have the data for
deactivated users.
Previously, we used to send "add" event for reactivation along
with complete user objects, but clients should have the data
for deactivated users as well, so an "update" event is enough
like we do when deactivating users.
This commit adds code to pass configuration objects for group
permission settings in register response to clients such that
we do need to duplicate that data in clients and can avoid
future bugs due to inconsistency.
The "server_supported_permission_settings" field is included
in the response if "realm" is present in "fetch_event_types",
as this is what we do for other server-related fields.
This commit renames permissions_configuration variable to
permission_configuration since the object contains config for
a single permission setting and thus permission_configuration
seems like a better name.
Earlier, when we used 'self.send_message()' in the backend tests,
the sent message was not marked as read for the sender.
Reason: To set the read flag, we have to check if
'message.sent_by_human()'. It returns False because the
'sending_client' for tests is "test suite" and the 'sent_by_human'
function doesn't enlist the "test suite" client name as a human client.
This commit adds "test suite" to that list.
Also fixes a bug in when apply_unread_message_event was called that
was revealed by this change.
This excludes the legacy webhook from the
"realm_incoming_webhook_bots" object as those do not have the same URL
format as modern webhook integrations.
This commit adds a `jitsi_server_url` field to the Realm model, which
will be used to save the URL of the custom Jitsi Meet server. In
the database, `None` will encode the server-level default. We can't
readily use `None` in the API, as it could be confused with "field not
sent". Therefore, we will use the string "default" for this purpose.
We have also introduced `server_jitsi_server_url` in the `/register`
API. This will be used to display the server's default Jitsi server
URL in the settings UI.
The existing `jitsi_server_url` will now be calculated as
`realm_jitsi_server_url || server_jitsi_server_url`.
Fixes a part of #17914.
Co-authored-by: Gaurav Pandey <gauravguitarrocks@gmail.com>
This algorithm existed in multiple places, with different queries.
Since we only access properties in the UserMessage table, we
standardize on the much simpler and faster Index Only Scan, rather
than a merge join.
This commit rename the existing setting `Who can invite users to this
organization` to `Who can send email invitations to new users` and
also renames all the variables related to this setting that do not
require a change to the API.
This was done for better code readability as a new setting
`Who can create invite links` will be added in future commits.