In e726012244, we removed the
@transaction.atomic decorator from the function
'bulk_set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'.
We should keep it to avoid adding it to the caller
of this function, when reused in the future.
Earlier, we were using 'send_event' & 'queue_json_publish' in
'do_send_messages' which can lead to a situation where we enqueue
events but the transaction fails at a later stage.
Events should not be sent until we know we're not rolling back.
This is preparatory work towards adding a Topic model.
We plan to use the local variable name as 'topic' for
the Topic model objects.
Currently, we use *topic as the local variable name for
topic names.
We rename local variables of the form *topic to *topic_name
so that we don't need to think about type collisions in
individual code paths where we might want to talk about both
Topic objects and strings for the topic name.
Earlier, 'is_row_muted' returned 'true' if the message was in
a muted stream or muted topic.
If the message is in an unmuted or followed topic in a muted
stream, such topics should be treated as not muted topics
in an unmuted stream.
This commit fixes the incorrect behavior.
Now, for wildcard mentions, 'unread_msgs.mentions' exclude
the IDs in muted streams only if the message is in default or
muted topic.
Also, 'unread_msgs.count' takes into account the unreads in unmuted
or followed topics in muted streams too.
Documents that this bug was fixed in the API changelog.
This prep commit renames the 'build_topic_mute_checker' function
to 'build_get_topic_visibility_policy' and updates it to support
all the visibility policies.
The function prefetches the visibility policies the user has
configured for various topics and prepares a dict named
'topic_to_visibility_policy' to be used later on.
This prep commit updates the lib function
'topic_has_visibility_policy' to add support for the case
when visibility_policy=INHERIT.
Previously, it had support for all the visibility policies
except INHERIT.
This commit refactors 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
to perform bulk database operations and the related changes.
There is an increase in database query count because requests
to delete user_topic rows now take two queries instead of one.
This is required for logging the info for a request to delete
a non-existent user_topic row while performing bulk operations
at the same time.
The overall query count will be lower while performing
bulk operations (multiple user_profiles instead of one).
This commit updates the 'do_update_message' codepath to
update the UserTopic records regardless of visibility policy
during the "move-topic" operation.
This is required before offering new visibility policies
in the UI.
Previously, UserTopic records were moved or deleted only
for objects with a MUTED visibility policy.
Fixes: #24574
This is a prep commit that renames 'set_topic_mutes' and
'topic_is_muted' to 'set_topic_visibility_policy' and
'topic_has_visibility_policy' respectively, and refactors
them to work with any visibility_policy, not only MUTED.
This commit updates 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
to not raise an error when deleting a UserTopic row and the user
doesn't have a visibility_policy for the topic yet, or when setting
the visibility_policy to its current value.
Also, it includes the changes to not send unnecessary events
in such cases.
This commit refactors 'do_set_user_topic_visibility_policy'
to remove the if/else block and just have a single call to
'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'.
The branching out behaviour based on the user_topic
visibility_policy is reduced to one place, i.e.,
'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'.
This commit replaces 'remove_topic_mute' with
'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database' and
updates it to delete UserTopic row with any configured
visibility_policy and not just muting.
In order to support different types of topic visibility policies,
this renames 'add_topic_mute' to
'set_user_topic_visibility_policy_in_database'
and refactors it to accept a parameter 'visibility_policy'.
Create a corresponding UserTopic row for any visibility policy,
not just muting topics.
When a UserTopic row for (user_profile, stream, topic, recipient_id)
exists already, it updates the row with the new visibility_policy.
In the event of a duplicate request, raises a JsonableError.
i.e., new_visibility_policy == existing_visibility_policy.
There is an increase in the database query count in the message-edit
code path.
Reason:
Earlier, 'add_topic_mute' used 'bulk_create' which either
creates or raises IntegrityError -- 1 query.
Now, 'set_user_topic_visibility_policy' uses get_or_create
-- 2 queries in the case of creating new row.
We can't use the previous approach, because now we have to
handle the case of updating the visibility_policy too.
Also, using bulk_* for a single row is not the correct way.
Co-authored-by: Kartik Srivastava <kaushiksri0908@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Prakhar Pratyush <prakhar841301@gmail.com>
Black 23 enforces some slightly more specific rules about empty line
counts and redundant parenthesis removal, but the result is still
compatible with Black 22.
(This does not actually upgrade our Python environment to Black 23
yet.)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This ensures type safety by not mutating the original queryset values,
that django-stubs to type as a TypedDict without total=False.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We now send a new user_topic event while muting and unmuting topics.
fetch_initial_state_data now returns an additional user_topics array to
the client that will maintain the user-topic relationship data.
This will support any future addition of new features to modify the
relationship between a user-topic pair.
This commit adds the relevent backend code and schema for the new
event.
The pattern of using the same variable to apply filters
or alter the `QuerySet` in other ways might produce `QuerySet`s
with incompatible types. This behavior is not allowed by mypy.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
The returned dictionary is not at all used outside the function, so it's
sufficient to make it available only within the helper function itself.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Previously, when a topic was edited (including being resolved), it
would become unmuted for any users who had muted it, which was
annoying.
While it's not possible to determine the user's intent completely,
this is clearly incorrect behavior in the `change_all` case, such as
resolving a topic.
The comments discuss some scenarios where we might want to enhance
this further, but this is the best we can do without large increases
in complexity.
Fixes#15210.
Co-authored-by: akshatdalton <akshat.dak@students.iiit.ac.in>
Prakhar Pratyush
Alex Vandiver
Prakhar Pratyush
Anders Kaseorg
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas
Kartik Srivastava
Zixuan James Li
Tim Abbott