mirror of https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
portico: Update why-zulip.
Originally we wanted it to be short, since we were worried about attention spans. But it seems like people are willing to read quite a bit when choosing a chat product, and our "10 second" pitch should just be a video, rather than a small amount of text.
This commit is contained in:
parent
43422fa6f2
commit
8ec161ab77
|
@ -4,28 +4,52 @@ in chat. If you haven’t seen Zulip in action, log on to our developers’
|
||||||
server at <https://chat.zulip.org>, or check out our short screencast
|
server at <https://chat.zulip.org>, or check out our short screencast
|
||||||
(coming soon) on topics and threading.
|
(coming soon) on topics and threading.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Asynchronous matters
|
## Zulip vs. Slack
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Zulip’s threading model allows for long-running conversations to co-exist
|
Zulip’s threading model allows for long-running conversations to co-exist
|
||||||
with real time chat. This allows remote team members, part-time contractors,
|
with real time chat. This allows senior staff, remote team members,
|
||||||
internal clients, and others who aren’t going to be on your chat full-time
|
part-time contractors, internal clients, and others who aren’t going to be
|
||||||
to participate effectively.
|
on your chat full-time to participate effectively.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Usability matters
|
In Slack (or Hipchat, Mattermost, or many others), if Bob starts a
|
||||||
|
conversation in a busy channel at 10am, and Ada swings by sometime in
|
||||||
|
the evening, there is no way for Ada to effectively participate in
|
||||||
|
that conversation. If Ada is a manager who spends most of her days in
|
||||||
|
meetings, or is a remote engineer living 8 time zones away, she won't
|
||||||
|
be able to participate in most conversations at all. This means that
|
||||||
|
in an organization that has adopted Slack, the vast majority of Ada's
|
||||||
|
conversations will still be over email, during meetings, or over Slack
|
||||||
|
direct messages.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Email is clunky for real-time communication. A thread with even 100 messages
|
By contrast, Zulip's lightweight threading model allows busy team
|
||||||
feels cluttered and slow, whereas real-time chat conversations (on any
|
members and remote workers to fully participate, even if they are
|
||||||
platform) regularly exceed that. Typing notifications, emoji reactions,
|
reading messages hours after they are sent (or the next day!). This
|
||||||
keyboard shortcuts, and blazingly fast clients make Zulip a daily
|
enables conversation that would otherwise happen over meetings or
|
||||||
pleasure. Usability is important; if people don’t like a communications
|
email to happen in Zulip itself. It also enables easy participation
|
||||||
tool, they just won't use it.
|
and information spread to those that have the least time to attend
|
||||||
|
meetings which have only a nugget of information that is relevant to
|
||||||
|
them.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Zulip vs. Email
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Email is clunky for real-time communication. A thread with even 50
|
||||||
|
messages feels cluttered and slow, whereas real-time chat
|
||||||
|
conversations (on any platform) regularly exceed that. Typing
|
||||||
|
notifications, emoji reactions, keyboard shortcuts, and blazingly fast
|
||||||
|
clients make Zulip a daily pleasure. Usability matters; in an
|
||||||
|
organization that relies on email for communication, things that could
|
||||||
|
have been resolved over chat end up being pushed to meetings instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Zulip changes the way you operate
|
## Zulip changes the way you operate
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The Zulip project currently has over 30 full-time engineers, working from 10
|
The Zulip project has over 30 core team members, working from over 10
|
||||||
different countries. Outside of one-on-one conversations, Zulip doesn’t have
|
different time zones and 25 different locations. Outside of one-on-one
|
||||||
a single phone or video-based meeting. Zulip also has 0 internal mailing
|
conversations, Zulip doesn’t have a single phone or video-based
|
||||||
lists, and 0 internal email discussions.
|
meeting. Zulip also has 0 internal mailing lists, and 0 internal email
|
||||||
|
discussions. By contrast, even Slack doesn't rely on Slack for remote
|
||||||
|
work; their
|
||||||
|
[careers page](https://slack.com/careers/location/all-locations/dept/all-departments)
|
||||||
|
doesn't list a single position where you could work from anywhere.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Threaded conversations mean that all stakeholders can see and respond to
|
Threaded conversations mean that all stakeholders can see and respond to
|
||||||
every message, just like in meetings and email. But unlike meetings, Zulip
|
every message, just like in meetings and email. But unlike meetings, Zulip
|
||||||
|
@ -34,7 +58,7 @@ commitments from folks that just need a 5 minute update. And unlike email, a
|
||||||
lively discussion of 300 Zulip messages is just as easy to digest and
|
lively discussion of 300 Zulip messages is just as easy to digest and
|
||||||
respond to as an in-person conversation.
|
respond to as an in-person conversation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Read more about how we’ve made Zulip work for you
|
## Read more about how we’ve made Zulip work for you
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* [Zulip for companies](/for/companies)
|
* [Zulip for companies](/for/companies)
|
||||||
* [Zulip for open source projects](/for/open-source)
|
* [Zulip for open source projects](/for/open-source)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue