mirror of https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
auth: Add detailed comments for auth subsystem.
Now that we've more or less stabilized our authentication/registration subsystem how we want it, it seems worth adding proper documentation for this. Fixes #7619.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0b02ea4e54
commit
873aca4a82
|
@ -71,6 +71,13 @@ def create_preregistration_user(email: str, request: HttpRequest, realm_creation
|
|||
def maybe_send_to_registration(request: HttpRequest, email: str, full_name: str='',
|
||||
is_signup: bool=False, password_required: bool=True,
|
||||
multiuse_object_key: str='') -> HttpResponse:
|
||||
"""Given a successful authentication for an email address (i.e. we've
|
||||
confirmed the user controls the email address) that does not
|
||||
currently have a Zulip account in the target realm, send them to
|
||||
the registration flow or the "continue to registration" flow,
|
||||
depending on is_signup, whether the email address can join the
|
||||
organization (checked in HomepageForm), and similar details.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
realm = get_realm(get_subdomain(request))
|
||||
from_multiuse_invite = False
|
||||
multiuse_obj = None
|
||||
|
@ -85,8 +92,11 @@ def maybe_send_to_registration(request: HttpRequest, email: str, full_name: str=
|
|||
|
||||
form = HomepageForm({'email': email}, realm=realm, from_multiuse_invite=from_multiuse_invite)
|
||||
if form.is_valid():
|
||||
# Construct a PreregistrationUser object and send the user over to
|
||||
# the confirmation view.
|
||||
# If the email address is allowed to sign up for an account in
|
||||
# this organization, construct a PreregistrationUser and
|
||||
# Confirmation objects, and then send the user to account
|
||||
# creation or confirm-continue-registration depending on
|
||||
# is_signup.
|
||||
prereg_user = None
|
||||
if settings.ONLY_SSO:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
|
@ -117,14 +127,15 @@ def maybe_send_to_registration(request: HttpRequest, email: str, full_name: str=
|
|||
return render(request,
|
||||
'zerver/confirm_continue_registration.html',
|
||||
context=context)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
url = reverse('register')
|
||||
return render(request,
|
||||
'zerver/accounts_home.html',
|
||||
context={'form': form, 'current_url': lambda: url,
|
||||
'from_multiuse_invite': from_multiuse_invite,
|
||||
'multiuse_object_key': multiuse_object_key},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# This email address it not allowed to join this organization, so
|
||||
# just send the user back to the registration page.
|
||||
url = reverse('register')
|
||||
return render(request,
|
||||
'zerver/accounts_home.html',
|
||||
context={'form': form, 'current_url': lambda: url,
|
||||
'from_multiuse_invite': from_multiuse_invite,
|
||||
'multiuse_object_key': multiuse_object_key})
|
||||
|
||||
def redirect_to_subdomain_login_url() -> HttpResponseRedirect:
|
||||
login_url = reverse('django.contrib.auth.views.login')
|
||||
|
@ -139,6 +150,24 @@ def login_or_register_remote_user(request: HttpRequest, remote_username: Optiona
|
|||
invalid_subdomain: bool=False, mobile_flow_otp: Optional[str]=None,
|
||||
is_signup: bool=False, redirect_to: str='',
|
||||
multiuse_object_key: str='') -> HttpResponse:
|
||||
"""Given a successful authentication showing the user controls given
|
||||
email address (remote_username) and potentially a UserProfile
|
||||
object (if the user already has a Zulip account), redirect the
|
||||
browser to the appropriate place:
|
||||
|
||||
* The logged-in app if the user already has a Zulip account and is
|
||||
trying to login, potentially to an initial narrow or page that had been
|
||||
saved in the `redirect_to` parameter.
|
||||
* The registration form if is_signup was set (i.e. the user is
|
||||
trying to create a Zulip account)
|
||||
* A special `confirm_continue_registration.html` "do you want to
|
||||
register or try another account" if the user doesn't have a
|
||||
Zulip account but is_signup is False (i.e. the user tried to login
|
||||
and then did social authentication selecting an email address that does
|
||||
not have a Zulip account in this organization).
|
||||
* A zulip:// URL to send control back to the mobile apps if they
|
||||
are doing authentication using the mobile_flow_otp flow.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
email = remote_user_to_email(remote_username)
|
||||
if user_profile is None or user_profile.is_mirror_dummy:
|
||||
# We have verified the user controls an email address, but
|
||||
|
@ -162,11 +191,15 @@ def login_or_register_remote_user(request: HttpRequest, remote_username: Optiona
|
|||
# We can't use HttpResponseRedirect, since it only allows HTTP(S) URLs
|
||||
response = HttpResponse(status=302)
|
||||
response['Location'] = 'zulip://login?' + urllib.parse.urlencode(params)
|
||||
# Maybe sending 'user_logged_in' signal is the better approach:
|
||||
|
||||
# Since we are returning an API key instead of going through
|
||||
# the Django login() function (which creates a browser
|
||||
# session, etc.), the "new login" signal handler (which
|
||||
# triggers an email notification new logins) will not run
|
||||
# automatically. So we call it manually here.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Arguably, sending a fake 'user_logged_in' signal would be a better approach:
|
||||
# user_logged_in.send(sender=user_profile.__class__, request=request, user=user_profile)
|
||||
# Not doing this only because over here we don't add the user information
|
||||
# in the session. If the signal receiver assumes that we do then that
|
||||
# would cause problems.
|
||||
email_on_new_login(sender=user_profile.__class__, request=request, user=user_profile)
|
||||
|
||||
# Mark this request as having a logged-in user for our server logs.
|
||||
|
@ -456,6 +489,12 @@ _subdomain_token_salt = 'zerver.views.auth.log_into_subdomain'
|
|||
|
||||
@log_view_func
|
||||
def log_into_subdomain(request: HttpRequest, token: str) -> HttpResponse:
|
||||
"""Given a valid signed authentication token (generated by
|
||||
redirect_and_log_into_subdomain called on auth.zulip.example.com),
|
||||
call login_or_register_remote_user, passing all the authentication
|
||||
result data that had been encoded in the signed token.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
data = signing.loads(token, salt=_subdomain_token_salt, max_age=15)
|
||||
except signing.SignatureExpired as e:
|
||||
|
@ -480,19 +519,36 @@ def log_into_subdomain(request: HttpRequest, token: str) -> HttpResponse:
|
|||
else:
|
||||
multiuse_object_key = ''
|
||||
|
||||
# We cannot pass the actual authenticated user_profile object that
|
||||
# was fetched by the original authentication backend and passed
|
||||
# into redirect_and_log_into_subdomain through a signed URL token,
|
||||
# so we need to re-fetch it from the database.
|
||||
if is_signup:
|
||||
# If we are signing up, user_profile should be None. In case
|
||||
# email_address already exists, user will get an error message.
|
||||
# If we are creating a new user account, user_profile will
|
||||
# always have been None, so we set that here. In the event
|
||||
# that a user account with this email was somehow created in a
|
||||
# race, the eventual registration code will catch that and
|
||||
# throw an error, so we don't need to check for that here.
|
||||
user_profile = None
|
||||
return_data = {} # type: Dict[str, Any]
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# We can be reasonably confident that this subdomain actually
|
||||
# has a corresponding realm, since it was referenced in a
|
||||
# signed cookie. But we probably should add some error
|
||||
# handling for the case where the realm disappeared in the
|
||||
# meantime.
|
||||
# We're just trying to login. We can be reasonably confident
|
||||
# that this subdomain actually has a corresponding active
|
||||
# realm, since the signed cookie proves there was one very
|
||||
# recently. But as part of fetching the UserProfile object
|
||||
# for the target user, we use DummyAuthBackend, which
|
||||
# conveniently re-validates that the realm and user account
|
||||
# were not deactivated in the meantime.
|
||||
|
||||
# Note: Ideally, we'd have a nice user-facing error message
|
||||
# for the case where this auth fails (because e.g. the realm
|
||||
# or user was deactivated since the signed cookie was
|
||||
# generated < 15 seconds ago), but the authentication result
|
||||
# is correct in those cases and such a race would be very
|
||||
# rare, so a nice error message is low priority.
|
||||
realm = get_realm(subdomain)
|
||||
user_profile, return_data = authenticate_remote_user(realm, email_address)
|
||||
|
||||
invalid_subdomain = bool(return_data.get('invalid_subdomain'))
|
||||
return login_or_register_remote_user(request, email_address, user_profile,
|
||||
full_name, invalid_subdomain=invalid_subdomain,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
|
|||
# Documentation for Zulip's authentication backends is split across a few places:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# * https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/production/authentication-methods.html and
|
||||
# zproject/prod_settings_template.py have user-level configuration documentation.
|
||||
# * https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/subsystems/auth.html has developer-level
|
||||
# documentation, especially on testing authentication backends in the Zulip
|
||||
# development environment.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Django upstream's documentation for authentication backends is also
|
||||
# helpful background. The most important detail to understand for
|
||||
# reading this file is that the Django authenticate() function will
|
||||
# call the authenticate methods of all backends registered in
|
||||
# settings.AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS that have a function signature
|
||||
# matching the args/kwargs passed in the authenticate() call.
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Set, Tuple, Union
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -25,6 +39,12 @@ from zerver.models import CustomProfileField, PreregistrationUser, UserProfile,
|
|||
custom_profile_fields_for_realm, get_default_stream_groups, get_user_profile_by_id, \
|
||||
remote_user_to_email, email_to_username, get_realm, get_user_by_delivery_email
|
||||
|
||||
# This first batch of methods is used by other code in Zulip to check
|
||||
# whether a given authentication backend is enabled for a given realm.
|
||||
# In each case, we both needs to check at the server level (via
|
||||
# `settings.AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS`, queried via
|
||||
# `django.contrib.auth.get_backends`) and at the realm level (via the
|
||||
# `Realm.authentication_methods` BitField).
|
||||
def pad_method_dict(method_dict: Dict[str, bool]) -> Dict[str, bool]:
|
||||
"""Pads an authentication methods dict to contain all auth backends
|
||||
supported by the software, regardless of whether they are
|
||||
|
@ -79,6 +99,11 @@ def require_email_format_usernames(realm: Optional[Realm]=None) -> bool:
|
|||
|
||||
def common_get_active_user(email: str, realm: Realm,
|
||||
return_data: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]=None) -> Optional[UserProfile]:
|
||||
"""This is the core common function used by essentially all
|
||||
authentication backends to check if there's an active user account
|
||||
with a given email address in the organization, handling both
|
||||
user-level and realm-level deactivation correctly.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
user_profile = get_user_by_delivery_email(email, realm)
|
||||
except UserProfile.DoesNotExist:
|
||||
|
@ -105,18 +130,26 @@ def common_get_active_user(email: str, realm: Realm,
|
|||
return user_profile
|
||||
|
||||
class ZulipAuthMixin:
|
||||
"""This common mixin is used to override Django's default behavior for
|
||||
looking up a logged-in user by ID to use a version that fetches
|
||||
from memcached before checking the database (avoiding a database
|
||||
query in most cases).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
def get_user(self, user_profile_id: int) -> Optional[UserProfile]:
|
||||
""" Get a UserProfile object from the user_profile_id. """
|
||||
"""Override the Django method for getting a UserProfile object from
|
||||
the user_profile_id,."""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
return get_user_profile_by_id(user_profile_id)
|
||||
except UserProfile.DoesNotExist:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
class ZulipDummyBackend(ZulipAuthMixin):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Used when we want to log you in without checking any
|
||||
"""Used when we want to log you in without checking any
|
||||
authentication (i.e. new user registration or when otherwise
|
||||
authentication has already been checked earlier in the process).
|
||||
|
||||
We ensure that this backend only ever successfully authenticates
|
||||
when explicitly requested by including the use_dummy_backend kwarg.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def authenticate(self, username: Optional[str]=None, realm: Optional[Realm]=None,
|
||||
|
@ -131,10 +164,9 @@ class ZulipDummyBackend(ZulipAuthMixin):
|
|||
|
||||
class EmailAuthBackend(ZulipAuthMixin):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Email Authentication Backend
|
||||
Email+Password Authentication Backend (the default).
|
||||
|
||||
Allows a user to sign in using an email/password pair rather than
|
||||
a username/password pair.
|
||||
Allows a user to sign in using an email/password pair.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def authenticate(self, username: Optional[str]=None, password: Optional[str]=None,
|
||||
|
@ -206,6 +238,14 @@ class GoogleMobileOauth2Backend(ZulipAuthMixin):
|
|||
return common_get_active_user(token_payload["email"], realm, return_data)
|
||||
|
||||
class ZulipRemoteUserBackend(RemoteUserBackend):
|
||||
"""Authentication backend that reads the Apache REMOTE_USER variable.
|
||||
Used primarily in enterprise environments with an SSO solution
|
||||
that has an Apache REMOTE_USER integration. For manual testing, see
|
||||
|
||||
https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/production/authentication-methods.html
|
||||
|
||||
See also remote_user_sso in zerver/views/auth.py.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
create_unknown_user = False
|
||||
|
||||
def authenticate(self, remote_user: Optional[str], realm: Optional[Realm]=None,
|
||||
|
@ -227,6 +267,13 @@ def is_valid_email(email: str) -> bool:
|
|||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
def email_belongs_to_ldap(realm: Realm, email: str) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Used to make determinations on whether a user's email address is
|
||||
managed by LDAP. For environments using both LDAP and
|
||||
Email+Password authentication, we do not allow EmailAuthBackend
|
||||
authentication for email addresses managed by LDAP (to avoid a
|
||||
security issue where one create separate credentials for an LDAP
|
||||
user), and this function is used to enforce that rule.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not ldap_auth_enabled(realm):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -253,27 +300,34 @@ class ZulipLDAPConfigurationError(Exception):
|
|||
LDAP_USER_ACCOUNT_CONTROL_DISABLED_MASK = 2
|
||||
|
||||
class ZulipLDAPAuthBackendBase(ZulipAuthMixin, LDAPBackend):
|
||||
"""Common code between LDAP authentication (ZulipLDAPAuthBackend) and
|
||||
using LDAP just to sync user data (ZulipLDAPUserPopulator).
|
||||
|
||||
To fully understand our LDAP backend, you may want to skim
|
||||
django_auth_ldap/backend.py from the upstream django-auth-ldap
|
||||
library. It's not a lot of code, and searching around in that
|
||||
file makes the flow for LDAP authentication clear.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
def __init__(self) -> None:
|
||||
# Used to initialize a fake LDAP directly for both manual
|
||||
# and automated testing in a development environment where
|
||||
# there is no actual LDAP server.
|
||||
if settings.DEVELOPMENT and settings.FAKE_LDAP_MODE: # nocoverage
|
||||
init_fakeldap()
|
||||
|
||||
# Don't use Django LDAP's permissions functions
|
||||
# Disable django-auth-ldap's permissions functions -- we don't use
|
||||
# the standard Django user/group permissions system because they
|
||||
# are prone to performance issues.
|
||||
def has_perm(self, user: Optional[UserProfile], perm: Any, obj: Any=None) -> bool:
|
||||
# Using Any type is safe because we are not doing anything with
|
||||
# the arguments.
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
def has_module_perms(self, user: Optional[UserProfile], app_label: Optional[str]) -> bool:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
def get_all_permissions(self, user: Optional[UserProfile], obj: Any=None) -> Set[Any]:
|
||||
# Using Any type is safe because we are not doing anything with
|
||||
# the arguments and always return empty set.
|
||||
return set()
|
||||
|
||||
def get_group_permissions(self, user: Optional[UserProfile], obj: Any=None) -> Set[Any]:
|
||||
# Using Any type is safe because we are not doing anything with
|
||||
# the arguments and always return empty set.
|
||||
return set()
|
||||
|
||||
def django_to_ldap_username(self, username: str) -> str:
|
||||
|
@ -306,12 +360,17 @@ class ZulipLDAPAuthBackendBase(ZulipAuthMixin, LDAPBackend):
|
|||
do_change_avatar_fields(user, UserProfile.AVATAR_FROM_USER)
|
||||
|
||||
def is_account_control_disabled_user(self, ldap_user: _LDAPUser) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Implements the userAccountControl check for whether a user has been
|
||||
disabled in an Active Directory server being integrated with
|
||||
Zulip via LDAP."""
|
||||
account_control_value = ldap_user.attrs[settings.AUTH_LDAP_USER_ATTR_MAP['userAccountControl']][0]
|
||||
ldap_disabled = bool(int(account_control_value) & LDAP_USER_ACCOUNT_CONTROL_DISABLED_MASK)
|
||||
return ldap_disabled
|
||||
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def get_mapped_name(cls, ldap_user: _LDAPUser) -> Tuple[str, str]:
|
||||
"""Constructs the user's Zulip full_name and short_name fields from
|
||||
the LDAP data"""
|
||||
if "full_name" in settings.AUTH_LDAP_USER_ATTR_MAP:
|
||||
full_name_attr = settings.AUTH_LDAP_USER_ATTR_MAP["full_name"]
|
||||
short_name = full_name = ldap_user.attrs[full_name_attr][0]
|
||||
|
@ -386,6 +445,10 @@ class ZulipLDAPAuthBackendBase(ZulipAuthMixin, LDAPBackend):
|
|||
|
||||
def get_or_build_user(self, username: str,
|
||||
ldap_user: _LDAPUser) -> Tuple[UserProfile, bool]:
|
||||
"""This is used only in non-authentication contexts such as:
|
||||
./manage.py sync_ldap_user_data
|
||||
In authentication contexts, this is overriden in ZulipLDAPAuthBackend.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
(user, built) = super().get_or_build_user(username, ldap_user)
|
||||
self.sync_avatar_from_ldap(user, ldap_user)
|
||||
self.sync_full_name_from_ldap(user, ldap_user)
|
||||
|
@ -423,12 +486,31 @@ class ZulipLDAPAuthBackend(ZulipLDAPAuthBackendBase):
|
|||
return_data['outside_ldap_domain'] = True
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
# Call into (ultimately) the django-auth-ldap authenticate
|
||||
# function. This will check the username/password pair
|
||||
# against the LDAP database, and assuming those are correct,
|
||||
# end up calling `self.get_or_build_user` with the
|
||||
# authenticated user's data from LDAP.
|
||||
return ZulipLDAPAuthBackendBase.authenticate(self,
|
||||
request=None,
|
||||
username=username,
|
||||
password=password)
|
||||
|
||||
def get_or_build_user(self, username: str, ldap_user: _LDAPUser) -> Tuple[UserProfile, bool]:
|
||||
"""The main function of our authentication backend extension of
|
||||
django-auth-ldap. When this is called (from `authenticate`),
|
||||
django-auth-ldap will already have verified that the provided
|
||||
username and password match those in the LDAP database.
|
||||
|
||||
This function's responsibility is to check (1) whether the
|
||||
email address for this user obtained from LDAP has an active
|
||||
account in this Zulip realm. If so, it will log them in.
|
||||
|
||||
Otherwise, to provide a seamless Single Sign-On experience
|
||||
with LDAP, this function can automatically create a new Zulip
|
||||
user account in the realm (assuming the realm is configured to
|
||||
allow that email address to sign up).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
return_data = {} # type: Dict[str, Any]
|
||||
|
||||
if settings.LDAP_EMAIL_ATTR is not None:
|
||||
|
@ -488,8 +570,13 @@ class ZulipLDAPAuthBackend(ZulipLDAPAuthBackendBase):
|
|||
|
||||
return user_profile, True
|
||||
|
||||
# Just like ZulipLDAPAuthBackend, but doesn't let you log in.
|
||||
class ZulipLDAPUserPopulator(ZulipLDAPAuthBackendBase):
|
||||
"""Just like ZulipLDAPAuthBackend, but doesn't let you log in. Used
|
||||
for syncing data like names, avatars, and custom profile fields
|
||||
from LDAP in `manage.py sync_ldap_user_data` as well as in
|
||||
registration for organizations that use a different SSO solution
|
||||
for managing login (often via RemoteUserBackend).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
def authenticate(self, username: str, password: str, realm: Optional[Realm]=None,
|
||||
return_data: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]=None) -> None:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
@ -504,8 +591,8 @@ def sync_user_from_ldap(user_profile: UserProfile) -> bool:
|
|||
return True
|
||||
|
||||
class DevAuthBackend(ZulipAuthMixin):
|
||||
# Allow logging in as any user without a password.
|
||||
# This is used for convenience when developing Zulip.
|
||||
"""Allow logging in as any user without a password. This is used for
|
||||
convenience when developing Zulip, and is disabled in production."""
|
||||
def authenticate(self, dev_auth_username: Optional[str]=None, realm: Optional[Realm]=None,
|
||||
return_data: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]=None) -> Optional[UserProfile]:
|
||||
assert dev_auth_username is not None
|
||||
|
@ -520,6 +607,8 @@ def social_associate_user_helper(backend: BaseAuth, return_data: Dict[str, Any],
|
|||
"""Responsible for doing the Zulip-account lookup and validation parts
|
||||
of the Zulip Social auth pipeline (similar to the authenticate()
|
||||
methods in most other auth backends in this file).
|
||||
|
||||
Returns a UserProfile object for successful authentication, and None otherwise.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
subdomain = backend.strategy.session_get('subdomain')
|
||||
realm = get_realm(subdomain)
|
||||
|
@ -536,8 +625,12 @@ def social_associate_user_helper(backend: BaseAuth, return_data: Dict[str, Any],
|
|||
return_data["social_auth_failed_reason"] = kwargs['response']["auth_failed_reason"]
|
||||
return None
|
||||
elif hasattr(backend, 'get_verified_emails'):
|
||||
# Some social backends, like GitHubAuthBackend, don't guarantee that
|
||||
# the `details` data is validated.
|
||||
# Some social backends, like GitHubAuthBackend, don't
|
||||
# guarantee that the `details` data is validated (i.e., it's
|
||||
# possible users can put any string they want in the "email"
|
||||
# field of the `details` object). For those backends, we have
|
||||
# custom per-backend code to properly fetch only verified
|
||||
# email addresses from the appropriate third-party API.
|
||||
verified_emails = backend.get_verified_emails(*args, **kwargs)
|
||||
if len(verified_emails) == 0:
|
||||
# TODO: Provide a nice error message screen to the user
|
||||
|
@ -581,6 +674,12 @@ def social_auth_associate_user(
|
|||
backend: BaseAuth,
|
||||
*args: Any,
|
||||
**kwargs: Any) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
||||
"""A simple wrapper function to reformat the return data from
|
||||
social_associate_user_helper as a dictionary. The
|
||||
python-social-auth infrastructure will then pass those values into
|
||||
later stages of settings.SOCIAL_AUTH_PIPELINE, such as
|
||||
social_auth_finish, as kwargs.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
return_data = {} # type: Dict[str, Any]
|
||||
user_profile = social_associate_user_helper(
|
||||
backend, return_data, *args, **kwargs)
|
||||
|
@ -593,6 +692,13 @@ def social_auth_finish(backend: Any,
|
|||
response: HttpResponse,
|
||||
*args: Any,
|
||||
**kwargs: Any) -> Optional[UserProfile]:
|
||||
"""Given the determination in social_auth_associate_user for whether
|
||||
the user should be authenticated, this takes care of actually
|
||||
logging in the user (if appropriate) and redirecting the browser
|
||||
to the appropriate next page depending on the situation. Read the
|
||||
comments below as well as login_or_register_remote_user in
|
||||
`zerver/views/auth.py` for the details on how that dispatch works.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
from zerver.views.auth import (login_or_register_remote_user,
|
||||
redirect_and_log_into_subdomain)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -642,13 +748,41 @@ def social_auth_finish(backend: Any,
|
|||
realm = Realm.objects.get(id=return_data["realm_id"])
|
||||
multiuse_object_key = strategy.session_get('multiuse_object_key', '')
|
||||
mobile_flow_otp = strategy.session_get('mobile_flow_otp')
|
||||
|
||||
# At this point, we have now confirmed that the user has
|
||||
# demonstrated control over the target email address.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The next step is to call login_or_register_remote_user, but
|
||||
# there are two code paths here because of an optimization to save
|
||||
# a redirect on mobile.
|
||||
|
||||
if mobile_flow_otp is not None:
|
||||
# For mobile app authentication, login_or_register_remote_user
|
||||
# will redirect to a special zulip:// URL that is handled by
|
||||
# the app after a successful authentication; so we can
|
||||
# redirect directly from here, saving a round trip over what
|
||||
# we need to do to create session cookies on the right domain
|
||||
# in the web login flow (below).
|
||||
return login_or_register_remote_user(strategy.request, email_address,
|
||||
user_profile, full_name,
|
||||
invalid_subdomain=bool(invalid_subdomain),
|
||||
mobile_flow_otp=mobile_flow_otp,
|
||||
is_signup=is_signup,
|
||||
redirect_to=redirect_to)
|
||||
|
||||
# If this authentication code were executing on
|
||||
# subdomain.zulip.example.com, we would just call
|
||||
# login_or_register_remote_user as in the mobile code path.
|
||||
# However, because third-party SSO providers generally don't allow
|
||||
# wildcard addresses in their redirect URLs, for multi-realm
|
||||
# servers, we will have just completed authentication on e.g.
|
||||
# auth.zulip.example.com (depending on
|
||||
# settings.SOCIAL_AUTH_SUBDOMAIN), which cannot store cookies on
|
||||
# the subdomain.zulip.example.com domain. So instead we serve a
|
||||
# redirect (encoding the authentication result data in a
|
||||
# cryptographically signed token) to a route on
|
||||
# subdomain.zulip.example.com that will verify the signature and
|
||||
# then call login_or_register_remote_user.
|
||||
return redirect_and_log_into_subdomain(realm, full_name, email_address,
|
||||
is_signup=is_signup,
|
||||
redirect_to=redirect_to,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue