mirror of https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
docs: Update documentation on AddIndexConcurrently.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
80def8d2c2
commit
4c80f035b1
|
@ -54,13 +54,12 @@ migrations.
|
|||
to the table, performing data backfills, or building indexes. We
|
||||
have a `zerver/lib/migrate.py` library to help with adding columns
|
||||
and backfilling data.
|
||||
- **Adding indexes** Regular `CREATE INDEX` SQL (corresponding to Django's
|
||||
`AddIndex` operation) locks writes to the affected table. This can be
|
||||
- **Adding indexes**. Django's regular `AddIndex` operation (corresponding
|
||||
to `CREATE INDEX` in SQL) locks writes to the affected table. This can be
|
||||
problematic when dealing with larger tables in particular and we've
|
||||
generally preferred to use `CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY` to allow the index
|
||||
to be built while the server is active. While in historical migrations
|
||||
we've used `RunSQL` directly, newer versions of Django add the corresponding
|
||||
operation `AddIndexConcurrently` and thus that's what should normally be used.
|
||||
generally preferred to use `AddIndexConcurrently` (corresponding to
|
||||
`CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY`) to allow the index to be built while
|
||||
the server is active.
|
||||
- **Atomicity**. By default, each Django migration is run atomically
|
||||
inside a transaction. This can be problematic if one wants to do
|
||||
something in a migration that touches a lot of data and would best
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue