mirror of https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
parent
7d74c64f75
commit
342b4eb457
|
@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ mind:
|
|||
* [Integrations](https://github.com/zulip/zulip/labels/integrations).
|
||||
Integrate Zulip with another piece of software and contribute it
|
||||
back to the community! Writing an integration can be a great
|
||||
started project. There's some brief documentation on the best way
|
||||
to write integrations at https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/70.
|
||||
starter project. There's detailed documentation on the best way
|
||||
to write integrations in [docs/integration-guide.md](docs/integration-guide.md).
|
||||
* [Documentation](https://github.com/zulip/zulip/labels/documentation):
|
||||
The Zulip project loves contributions of new documentation.
|
||||
* [Help Wanted](https://github.com/zulip/zulip/labels/help%20wanted):
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
|
|||
# Integration Writing Guide
|
||||
|
||||
Our integrations are one of the most important parts of Zulip, so it's
|
||||
important that they are all implemented to the highest standard of
|
||||
quality that we can write.
|
||||
|
||||
Contributions to this guide are very welcome, so if you run into any
|
||||
issues following these instructions or come up with any tips while
|
||||
writing an integration, please open an issue or submit a pull request!
|
||||
|
||||
## Types of integrations
|
||||
|
||||
We have several different ways that we integrate with 3rd part
|
||||
products, ordered here by which types we prefer to write:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Webhook integrations (examples: Freshdesk, GitHub), where the
|
||||
third-party service supports posting content to a particular URI on
|
||||
our site with data about the event. For these, you usually just need
|
||||
to add a new handler in `zerver/views/webhooks.py` (plus
|
||||
test/document/etc.). An example commit implementing a new webhook.
|
||||
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/pull/324.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Python script integrations (examples: Trac, Git), where we can get
|
||||
the service to call our integration (by shelling out or otherwise),
|
||||
passing in the required data. Our preferred model for these is to
|
||||
ship these integrations in our API tarballs (by writing the
|
||||
integration in `api/integrations`).
|
||||
|
||||
3. Plugin integrations (examples: Jenkins, Hubot) where the user needs
|
||||
to install a native-language plugin into their existing software,
|
||||
which can be more work, since we may not have Zulip API bindings for
|
||||
the relevant language.
|
||||
|
||||
## General advice for writing integrations
|
||||
|
||||
* Consider using our Zulip markup to make the output from your
|
||||
integration especially attractive or useful (e.g. emoji, markdown
|
||||
emphasis, @-mentions, or `!avatar(email)`).
|
||||
|
||||
* Use topics effectively to ensure sequential messages about the same
|
||||
thing are threaded together; this makes for much better consumption
|
||||
by users. E.g. for a bug tracker integration, put the bug number in
|
||||
the topic for all messages; for an integration like Nagios, put the
|
||||
service in the topic.
|
||||
|
||||
* Integrations that don't match a team's workflow can often be
|
||||
uselessly spammy. Give careful thought to providing options for
|
||||
triggering Zulip messages only for certain message types, certain
|
||||
projects, or sending different messages to different streams/topics,
|
||||
to make it easy for teams to configure the integration to support
|
||||
their workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
* Sometimes it can be helpful to contact the vendor if it appears they
|
||||
don't have an API or webhook we can use -- sometimes the right API
|
||||
is just not properly documented.
|
||||
|
||||
## Writing Webhook integrations
|
||||
|
||||
New Zulip webhook integrations can take just a few hours to write,
|
||||
including tests and documentation, if you use the right process.
|
||||
Here's how we recommend doing it:
|
||||
|
||||
* First, use http://requestb.in/ or a similar site to capture an
|
||||
example webhook payload from the service you're integrating. You
|
||||
can use these captured payloads to create a set of test fixtures for
|
||||
your integration under `zerver/fixtures`.
|
||||
|
||||
* Then write a draft webhook handler under `zerver/views/webhooks/`;
|
||||
there are a lot of examples in that directory. We recommend
|
||||
templating off a short one (like `travis.py`), since the longer ones
|
||||
usually just have more complex parsing which can obscure what's
|
||||
common to all webhook integrations.
|
||||
|
||||
* Then write a test for your fixture in `zerver/test_hooks.py`, and
|
||||
you can iterate on the tests and webhooks handler until they work,
|
||||
all without ever needing to post directly from the server you're
|
||||
integrating to your Zulip development machine. To run just the
|
||||
tests from the test class you wrote, you can use e.g.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
test-backend zerver.test_hooks.PagerDutyHookTests
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
See
|
||||
https://github.com/zulip/zulip/blob/master/README.dev.md#running-the-test-suite
|
||||
for more details on the Zulip test runner.
|
||||
|
||||
* Once you've gotten your webhook working and passing a test, capture
|
||||
payloads for the other common types of posts the service's webhook
|
||||
will make, and add tests for them; usually this part of the process
|
||||
is pretty fast. Webhook integration tests should all use fixtures
|
||||
(as opposed to contacting the service), since otherwise the tests
|
||||
can't run without Internet access and some sort of credentials for
|
||||
the service.
|
||||
|
||||
* Finally, write documentation for the integration (see below)!
|
||||
|
||||
## Writing Python script and plugin integrations integrations
|
||||
|
||||
For plugin integrations, usually you will need to consult the
|
||||
documentation for the third party software in order to learn how to
|
||||
write the integration. But we have a few notes on how to do these:
|
||||
|
||||
* You should always send messages by POSTing to URLs of the form
|
||||
`https://zulip.example.com/v1/messages/`, not the legacy
|
||||
`/api/v1/send_message` message sending API.
|
||||
|
||||
* We usually build Python script integration with (at least) 2 files:
|
||||
`zulip_foo_config.py`` containing the configuration for the
|
||||
integration including the bots' API keys, plus a script that reads
|
||||
from this configuration to actually do the work (that way, it's
|
||||
possible to update the script without breaking users' configurations).
|
||||
|
||||
* Be sure to test your integration carefully and document how to
|
||||
install it (see notes on documentation below).
|
||||
|
||||
* You should specify a clear HTTP User-Agent for your integration. The
|
||||
user agent should at a minimum identify the integration and version
|
||||
number, separated by a slash. If possible, you should collect platform
|
||||
information and include that in `()`s after the version number. Some
|
||||
examples of ideal UAs are:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
ZulipDesktop/0.7.0 (Ubuntu; 14.04)
|
||||
ZulipJenkins/0.1.0 (Windows; 7.2)
|
||||
ZulipMobile/0.5.4 (Android; 4.2; maguro)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Documenting your integration
|
||||
|
||||
Every Zulip integration must be documented in
|
||||
`templates/zerver/integrations.html`. Usually, this involves a few
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
|
||||
* Add an `integration-lozenge` class block in the alphabetically
|
||||
correct place in the main integration list, using the logo for the
|
||||
integrated software.
|
||||
|
||||
* Add an `integration-instructions` class block also in the
|
||||
alphabetically correct place, explaining all the steps required to
|
||||
setup the integration, including what URLs to use, etc. If there
|
||||
are any screens in the product involved, take a few screenshots with
|
||||
the input fields filled out with sample values in order to make the
|
||||
instructions really easy to follow.
|
||||
|
||||
* Finally, generate a message sent by the integration and take a
|
||||
screenshot of the message to provide an example message in the
|
||||
documentation.
|
||||
|
||||
When writing documentation for your integration, be sure to use the
|
||||
`{{ external_api_uri }}` template variable, so that your integration
|
||||
documentation will provide the correct URL for whatever server it is
|
||||
deployed on. If special configuration is required to set the SITE
|
||||
variable, you should document that too, inside an `{% if
|
||||
api_site_required %}` check.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue