zulip/zerver/tests/test_message_topics.py

289 lines
10 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

from django.utils.timezone import now as timezone_now
from zerver.lib.actions import do_change_stream_invite_only
from zerver.lib.test_classes import ZulipTestCase
from zerver.models import Message, UserMessage, get_client, get_realm, get_stream
class TopicHistoryTest(ZulipTestCase):
def test_topics_history_zephyr_mirror(self) -> None:
user_profile = self.mit_user("sipbtest")
stream_name = "new_stream"
# Send a message to this new stream from another user
self.subscribe(self.mit_user("starnine"), stream_name)
stream = get_stream(stream_name, user_profile.realm)
self.send_stream_message(self.mit_user("starnine"), stream_name, topic_name="secret topic")
# Now subscribe this MIT user to the new stream and verify
# that the new topic is not accessible
self.login_user(user_profile)
self.subscribe(user_profile, stream_name)
endpoint = f"/json/users/me/{stream.id}/topics"
result = self.client_get(endpoint, {}, subdomain="zephyr")
self.assert_json_success(result)
history = result.json()["topics"]
self.assertEqual(history, [])
def test_topics_history(self) -> None:
# verified: int(UserMessage.flags.read) == 1
user_profile = self.example_user("iago")
self.login_user(user_profile)
stream_name = "Verona"
stream = get_stream(stream_name, user_profile.realm)
recipient = stream.recipient
def create_test_message(topic: str) -> int:
# TODO: Clean this up to send messages the normal way.
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
message = Message(
sender=hamlet,
recipient=recipient,
content="whatever",
date_sent=timezone_now(),
sending_client=get_client("whatever"),
)
message.set_topic_name(topic)
message.save()
UserMessage.objects.create(
user_profile=user_profile,
message=message,
flags=0,
)
return message.id
# our most recent topics are topic0, topic1, topic2
# Create old messages with strange spellings.
create_test_message("topic2")
create_test_message("toPIc1")
create_test_message("toPIc0")
create_test_message("topic2")
create_test_message("topic2")
create_test_message("Topic2")
# Create new messages
topic2_msg_id = create_test_message("topic2")
create_test_message("topic1")
create_test_message("topic1")
topic1_msg_id = create_test_message("topic1")
topic0_msg_id = create_test_message("topic0")
endpoint = f"/json/users/me/{stream.id}/topics"
result = self.client_get(endpoint, {})
self.assert_json_success(result)
history = result.json()["topics"]
# We only look at the most recent three topics, because
# the prior fixture data may be unreliable.
history = history[:3]
self.assertEqual(
[topic["name"] for topic in history],
[
"topic0",
"topic1",
"topic2",
],
)
self.assertEqual(
[topic["max_id"] for topic in history],
[
topic0_msg_id,
topic1_msg_id,
topic2_msg_id,
],
)
# Now try as cordelia, who we imagine as a totally new user in
# that she doesn't have UserMessage rows. We should see the
# same results for a public stream.
self.login("cordelia")
result = self.client_get(endpoint, {})
self.assert_json_success(result)
history = result.json()["topics"]
# We only look at the most recent three topics, because
# the prior fixture data may be unreliable.
history = history[:3]
self.assertEqual(
[topic["name"] for topic in history],
[
"topic0",
"topic1",
"topic2",
],
)
self.assertIn("topic0", [topic["name"] for topic in history])
self.assertEqual(
[topic["max_id"] for topic in history],
[
topic0_msg_id,
topic1_msg_id,
topic2_msg_id,
],
)
# Now make stream private, but subscribe cordelia
do_change_stream_invite_only(stream, True)
self.subscribe(self.example_user("cordelia"), stream.name)
result = self.client_get(endpoint, {})
self.assert_json_success(result)
history = result.json()["topics"]
history = history[:3]
# Cordelia doesn't have these recent history items when we
# wasn't subscribed in her results.
self.assertNotIn("topic0", [topic["name"] for topic in history])
self.assertNotIn("topic1", [topic["name"] for topic in history])
self.assertNotIn("topic2", [topic["name"] for topic in history])
def test_bad_stream_id(self) -> None:
self.login("iago")
# non-sensible stream id
endpoint = "/json/users/me/9999999999/topics"
result = self.client_get(endpoint, {})
self.assert_json_error(result, "Invalid stream id")
# out of realm
bad_stream = self.make_stream(
"mit_stream",
realm=get_realm("zephyr"),
)
endpoint = f"/json/users/me/{bad_stream.id}/topics"
result = self.client_get(endpoint, {})
self.assert_json_error(result, "Invalid stream id")
# private stream to which I am not subscribed
private_stream = self.make_stream(
"private_stream",
invite_only=True,
)
endpoint = f"/json/users/me/{private_stream.id}/topics"
result = self.client_get(endpoint, {})
self.assert_json_error(result, "Invalid stream id")
def test_get_topics_web_public_stream_web_public_request(self) -> None:
tests: Ensure stream senders get a UserMessage row. We now complain if a test author sends a stream message that does not result in the sender getting a UserMessage row for the message. This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the sender to the stream. We exempt bots from this check, although it is plausible we should only exempt the system bots like the notification bot. I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream, but that can be a little more expensive than the current check, and we generally want test setup to be explicit. If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the backend to just write a UserMessage row in that hypothetical situation. For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed here, the author just wants their test setup to realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to Scotland. Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high school, and our stream subscriptions don't even necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his characters in. There may also be some legitimate use case where an author wants to simulate sending a message to an unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
2021-12-10 13:55:48 +01:00
iago = self.example_user("iago")
stream = self.make_stream("web-public-steram", is_web_public=True)
tests: Ensure stream senders get a UserMessage row. We now complain if a test author sends a stream message that does not result in the sender getting a UserMessage row for the message. This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the sender to the stream. We exempt bots from this check, although it is plausible we should only exempt the system bots like the notification bot. I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream, but that can be a little more expensive than the current check, and we generally want test setup to be explicit. If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the backend to just write a UserMessage row in that hypothetical situation. For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed here, the author just wants their test setup to realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to Scotland. Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high school, and our stream subscriptions don't even necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his characters in. There may also be some legitimate use case where an author wants to simulate sending a message to an unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
2021-12-10 13:55:48 +01:00
self.subscribe(iago, stream.name)
for i in range(3):
tests: Ensure stream senders get a UserMessage row. We now complain if a test author sends a stream message that does not result in the sender getting a UserMessage row for the message. This is basically 100% equivalent to complaining that the author failed to subscribe the sender to the stream as part of the test setup, as far as I can tell, so the AssertionError instructs the author to subscribe the sender to the stream. We exempt bots from this check, although it is plausible we should only exempt the system bots like the notification bot. I considered auto-subscribing the sender to the stream, but that can be a little more expensive than the current check, and we generally want test setup to be explicit. If there is some legitimate way than a subscribed human sender can't get a UserMessage, then we probably want an explicit test for that, or we may want to change the backend to just write a UserMessage row in that hypothetical situation. For most tests, including almost all the ones fixed here, the author just wants their test setup to realistically reflect normal operation, and often devs may not realize that Cordelia is not subscribed to Denmark or not realize that Hamlet is not subscribed to Scotland. Some of us don't remember our Shakespeare from high school, and our stream subscriptions don't even necessarily reflect which countries the Bard placed his characters in. There may also be some legitimate use case where an author wants to simulate sending a message to an unsubscribed stream, but for those edge cases, they can always set allow_unsubscribed_sender to True.
2021-12-10 13:55:48 +01:00
self.send_stream_message(iago, stream.name, topic_name="topic" + str(i))
endpoint = f"/json/users/me/{stream.id}/topics"
result = self.client_get(endpoint)
self.assert_json_success(result)
history = result.json()["topics"]
self.assertEqual(
[topic["name"] for topic in history],
[
"topic2",
"topic1",
"topic0",
],
)
def test_get_topics_non_web_public_stream_web_public_request(self) -> None:
stream = get_stream("Verona", self.example_user("iago").realm)
endpoint = f"/json/users/me/{stream.id}/topics"
result = self.client_get(endpoint)
self.assert_json_error(result, "Invalid stream id", 400)
def test_get_topics_non_existant_stream_web_public_request(self) -> None:
non_existant_stream_id = 10000000000000000000000
endpoint = f"/json/users/me/{non_existant_stream_id}/topics"
result = self.client_get(endpoint)
self.assert_json_error(result, "Invalid stream id", 400)
class TopicDeleteTest(ZulipTestCase):
def test_topic_delete(self) -> None:
initial_last_msg_id = self.get_last_message().id
stream_name = "new_stream"
topic_name = "new topic 2"
# NON-ADMIN USER
user_profile = self.example_user("hamlet")
self.subscribe(user_profile, stream_name)
# Send message
stream = get_stream(stream_name, user_profile.realm)
self.send_stream_message(user_profile, stream_name, topic_name=topic_name)
last_msg_id = self.send_stream_message(user_profile, stream_name, topic_name=topic_name)
# Deleting the topic
self.login_user(user_profile)
endpoint = "/json/streams/" + str(stream.id) + "/delete_topic"
result = self.client_post(
endpoint,
{
"topic_name": topic_name,
},
)
self.assert_json_error(result, "Must be an organization administrator")
self.assertEqual(self.get_last_message().id, last_msg_id)
# Make stream private with limited history
do_change_stream_invite_only(stream, invite_only=True, history_public_to_subscribers=False)
# ADMIN USER subscribed now
user_profile = self.example_user("iago")
self.subscribe(user_profile, stream_name)
self.login_user(user_profile)
new_last_msg_id = self.send_stream_message(user_profile, stream_name, topic_name=topic_name)
# Now admin deletes all messages in topic -- which should only
# delete new_last_msg_id, i.e. the one sent since they joined.
self.assertEqual(self.get_last_message().id, new_last_msg_id)
result = self.client_post(
endpoint,
{
"topic_name": topic_name,
},
)
self.assert_json_success(result)
self.assertEqual(self.get_last_message().id, last_msg_id)
# Try to delete all messages in the topic again. There are no messages accessible
# to the administrator, so this should do nothing.
result = self.client_post(
endpoint,
{
"topic_name": topic_name,
},
)
self.assert_json_success(result)
self.assertEqual(self.get_last_message().id, last_msg_id)
# Make the stream's history public to subscribers
do_change_stream_invite_only(stream, invite_only=True, history_public_to_subscribers=True)
# Delete the topic should now remove all messages
result = self.client_post(
endpoint,
{
"topic_name": topic_name,
},
)
self.assert_json_success(result)
self.assertEqual(self.get_last_message().id, initial_last_msg_id)
# Delete again, to test the edge case of deleting an empty topic.
result = self.client_post(
endpoint,
{
"topic_name": topic_name,
},
)
self.assert_json_success(result)
self.assertEqual(self.get_last_message().id, initial_last_msg_id)