zulip/frontend_tests/node_tests/example4.js

145 lines
4.3 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

"use strict";
const {strict: assert} = require("assert");
const {mock_esm, zrequire} = require("../zjsunit/namespace");
const {run_test} = require("../zjsunit/test");
/*
Let's step back and review what we've done so far.
We've used fairly straightforward testing techniques
to explore the following modules:
filter
message_store
narrow_state
people
stream_data
util
We haven't gone deep on any of these objects, but if
you are interested, all of these objects have test
suites that have 100% line coverage on the modules
that implement those objects. For example, you can look
at people.js in this directory for more tests on the
people object.
We can quickly review some testing concepts:
zrequire - bring in real code
set_global - create stubs
assert.equal - verify results
------
Let's talk about our next steps.
An app is pretty useless without an actual data source.
One of the primary ways that a Zulip client gets data
is through events. (We also get data at page load, and
we can also ask the server for data, but that's not in
the scope of this conversation yet.)
Chat systems are dynamic. If an admin adds a user, or
if a user sends a messages, the server immediately sends
events to all clients so that they can reflect appropriate
changes in their UI. We're not going to discuss the entire
"full stack" mechanism here. Instead, we'll focus on
the client code, starting at the boundary where we
process events.
Let's just get started...
*/
// We are going to use mock versions of some of our libraries.
const activity = mock_esm("../../static/js/activity");
const message_live_update = mock_esm("../../static/js/message_live_update");
const pm_list = mock_esm("../../static/js/pm_list");
const settings_users = mock_esm("../../static/js/settings_users");
// Use real versions of these modules.
const people = zrequire("people");
const server_events_dispatch = zrequire("server_events_dispatch");
const bob = {
email: "bob@example.com",
user_id: 33,
full_name: "Bob Roberts",
};
run_test("add users with event", () => {
people.init();
const event = {
type: "realm_user",
op: "add",
person: bob,
};
assert(!people.is_known_user_id(bob.user_id));
// Let's simulate dispatching our event!
server_events_dispatch.dispatch_normal_event(event);
// And it works!
assert(people.is_known_user_id(bob.user_id));
});
/*
It's actually a little surprising that adding a user does
not have side effects beyond the people object. I guess
we don't immediately update the buddy list, but that's
because the buddy list gets updated on the next server
fetch.
Let's try an update next. To make this work, we will want
to override some of our stubs.
This is where we see a little extra benefit from the
run_test wrapper. It passes us in an object that we
can use to override data, and that works within the
scope of the function.
*/
run_test("update user with event", (override) => {
people.init();
people.add_active_user(bob);
const new_bob = {
email: "bob@example.com",
user_id: bob.user_id,
full_name: "The Artist Formerly Known as Bob",
};
const event = {
type: "realm_user",
op: "update",
person: new_bob,
};
// We have to stub a few things. We don't want to test
// the details of these functions, but we do want to
// verify that they run. Fortunately, the run_test()
// wrapper will tell us if we override a method that
// doesn't get called!
override(activity, "redraw", () => {});
override(message_live_update, "update_user_full_name", () => {});
override(pm_list, "update_private_messages", () => {});
override(settings_users, "update_user_data", () => {});
// Dispatch the realm_user/update event, which will update
// data structures and have other side effects that are
// stubbed out above.
server_events_dispatch.dispatch_normal_event(event);
const user = people.get_by_user_id(bob.user_id);
// Verify that the code actually did its main job:
assert.equal(user.full_name, "The Artist Formerly Known as Bob");
});