2022-09-19 08:38:08 +02:00
|
|
|
# Reviewable pull requests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This page offers some tips for making your pull requests easy to review.
|
|
|
|
Following this advice will help the whole Zulip project move more quickly by
|
|
|
|
saving maintainers time when they review your code. It will also make a big
|
|
|
|
difference for getting your work integrated without delay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Posting a pull request
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Before requesting a review for your pull request, follow our guide to
|
|
|
|
carefully [review and test your own
|
|
|
|
code](./code-reviewing.md#reviewing-your-own-code). Doing so can save many
|
|
|
|
review round-trips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Make sure the pull request template is filled out correctly, and that all the
|
|
|
|
relevant points on the self-review checklist (if the repository has one) have
|
|
|
|
been addressed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Be sure to explicitly call out any open questions, concerns, or decisions you
|
|
|
|
are uncertain about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Addressing feedback
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-07 19:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
- When you update your pull request after addressing a round of review feedback,
|
|
|
|
be clear about which issues you've resolved (and how!).
|
2022-09-19 08:38:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Even more importantly, save time for your reviewers by indicating any feedback
|
|
|
|
you _haven't_ addressed yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Working on larger projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a larger project, aim to create a series of small (less than 100 lines of
|
|
|
|
code) commits that are each safely mergeable and move you towards your goal. A
|
|
|
|
mergeable commit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Is well-tested and passes all the tests. That is, changes to tests should be in
|
|
|
|
the same commit as changes to the code that they are testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Does not make Zulip worse. For example, it is fine to add backend capabilities
|
|
|
|
without adding a frontend to access them. It's not fine to add a frontend
|
|
|
|
component with no backend to make it work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ideally, when reviewing a branch you are working on, the maintainer
|
|
|
|
should be able to verify and merge the first few commits and leave
|
|
|
|
comments on the rest. It is by far the most efficient way to do
|
|
|
|
collaborative development, since one is constantly making progress, we
|
|
|
|
keep branches small, and developers don't end up repeatedly reviewing
|
2023-03-07 19:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
the earlier parts of a pull request.
|
2022-09-19 08:38:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is some advice on how to proceed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Use `git rebase -i` as much as you need to shape your commit
|
|
|
|
structure. See the [Git guide](../git/overview.md) for useful
|
|
|
|
resources on mastering Git.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- If you need to refactor code, add tests, rename variables, or make
|
|
|
|
other changes that do not change the functionality of the product, make those
|
|
|
|
changes into a series of preparatory commits that can be merged independently
|
|
|
|
of building the feature itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- To figure out what refactoring needs to happen, you might first make a hacky
|
|
|
|
attempt at hooking together the feature, with reading and print statements as
|
|
|
|
part of the effort, to identify any refactoring needed or tests you want to
|
|
|
|
write to help make sure your changes won't break anything important as you work.
|
|
|
|
Work out a fast and consistent test procedure for how to make sure the
|
|
|
|
feature is working as planned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Build a mergeable version of the feature on top of those refactorings.
|
|
|
|
Whenever possible, find chunks of complexity that you can separate from the
|
|
|
|
rest of the project.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-05 22:36:22 +01:00
|
|
|
See our [commit discipline guide](../contributing/commit-discipline.md) for
|
2022-09-19 08:38:08 +02:00
|
|
|
more details on writing reviewable commits.
|
2023-03-07 19:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Tips and best practices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When writing comments for pull requests, it's good to be familiar with
|
|
|
|
[GitHub's basic formatting syntax][github-syntax]. Here are some additional
|
|
|
|
tips and best practices that Zulip contributors and maintainers have found
|
|
|
|
helpful for writing clear and thorough pull request comments:
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-13 15:16:59 +01:00
|
|
|
- If there has been a conversation in the [Zulip development
|
|
|
|
community][zulip-dev-community] about the changes you've made or the issue
|
|
|
|
your pull request addresses, please cross-link between your pull request and
|
|
|
|
those conversations. This provides helpful context for maintainers and
|
|
|
|
reviewers. Specifically, it's best to link from your pull request [to a
|
|
|
|
specific message][link-to-message], as these links will still work even if the
|
|
|
|
topic of the conversation is renamed, moved or resolved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once you've created a pull request on GitHub, you can use one of the [custom
|
|
|
|
linkifiers][dev-community-linkifiers] in the development community to easily
|
|
|
|
link to your pull request from the relevant conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-07 19:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
- For [screenshots or screencasts][screenshots-gifs] of changes,
|
|
|
|
putting them in details/summary tags reduces visual clutter
|
|
|
|
and scroll length of pull request comments. This is especially
|
2023-03-13 15:14:06 +01:00
|
|
|
useful when you have several screenshots and/or screencasts to
|
2023-03-07 19:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
include in your comment as you can put each image, or group of
|
|
|
|
images, in separate details/summary tags.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
<details>
|
|
|
|
<summary>Descriptive summary of image</summary>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![uploaded-image](uploaded-file-information)
|
|
|
|
</details>
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- For before and after images or videos of changes, using GithHub's table
|
|
|
|
syntax renders them side-by-side for quick and clear comparison.
|
2023-03-13 15:14:06 +01:00
|
|
|
While this works well for narrow or small images, it can be hard to
|
|
|
|
see details in large, full screen images and videos in this format.
|
2023-03-07 19:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that you can put the table syntax inside the details/summary
|
|
|
|
tags described above as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Descriptive header for images:
|
|
|
|
| Before | After |
|
|
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
|
|
| ![image-before](uploaded-file-information) | ![image-after](uploaded-file-information)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- If you've updated existing documentation in your pull request,
|
|
|
|
include a link to the current documentation above the screenshot
|
|
|
|
of the updates. That way a reviewer can quickly access the current
|
|
|
|
documentation while reviewing your changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
[Current documentation](link-to-current-documentation-page)
|
|
|
|
![image-after](uploaded-file-information)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- For updates or changes to CSS class rules, it's a good practice
|
|
|
|
to include the results of a [git-grep][git-grep] search for
|
|
|
|
the class name(s) to confirm that you've tested all the impacted
|
|
|
|
areas of the UI and/or documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```console
|
|
|
|
$ git grep '.example-class-name' web/templates/ templates/
|
|
|
|
templates/corporate/...
|
|
|
|
templates/zerver/...
|
|
|
|
web/templates/...
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[github-syntax]: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/getting-started-with-writing-and-formatting-on-github/basic-writing-and-formatting-syntax
|
|
|
|
[git-grep]: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-grep
|
|
|
|
[screenshots-gifs]: ../tutorials/screenshot-and-gif-software.md
|
2023-03-13 15:16:59 +01:00
|
|
|
[zulip-dev-community]: https://chat.zulip.org
|
|
|
|
[link-to-message]: https://zulip.com/help/link-to-a-message-or-conversation#get-a-link-to-a-specific-message
|
|
|
|
[dev-community-linkifiers]: https://zulip.com/development-community/#linking-to-github-issues-and-pull-requests
|