2020-06-05 23:35:52 +02:00
|
|
|
import base64
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
import os
|
2017-09-15 09:38:12 +02:00
|
|
|
import smtplib
|
2020-06-11 00:54:34 +02:00
|
|
|
import time
|
2020-10-10 04:54:09 +02:00
|
|
|
from collections import defaultdict
|
2020-11-10 22:32:01 +01:00
|
|
|
from inspect import isabstract
|
|
|
|
from typing import Any, Callable, Dict, List, Mapping, Optional
|
2020-06-11 00:54:34 +02:00
|
|
|
from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-07 01:09:47 +02:00
|
|
|
import orjson
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
from django.conf import settings
|
2019-02-02 23:53:44 +01:00
|
|
|
from django.test import override_settings
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.email_mirror import RateLimitedRealmMirror
|
2019-03-21 10:24:56 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.email_mirror_helpers import encode_email_address
|
2019-12-02 19:13:49 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.queue import MAX_REQUEST_RETRIES
|
2020-03-04 14:05:25 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.rate_limiter import RateLimiterLockingException
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.remote_server import PushNotificationBouncerRetryLaterError
|
2018-01-30 20:06:23 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.send_email import FromAddress
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.test_classes import ZulipTestCase
|
2020-08-14 10:03:36 +02:00
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.test_helpers import mock_queue_publish, simulated_queue_client
|
2020-06-11 00:54:34 +02:00
|
|
|
from zerver.models import PreregistrationUser, UserActivity, get_client, get_realm, get_stream
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.tornado.event_queue import build_offline_notification
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.worker import queue_processors
|
2017-11-10 15:00:45 +01:00
|
|
|
from zerver.worker.queue_processors import (
|
2017-11-29 08:25:57 +01:00
|
|
|
EmailSendingWorker,
|
2017-11-10 15:00:45 +01:00
|
|
|
LoopQueueProcessingWorker,
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
MissedMessageWorker,
|
2020-06-11 00:54:34 +02:00
|
|
|
QueueProcessingWorker,
|
|
|
|
get_active_worker_queues,
|
2017-11-10 15:00:45 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
Event = Dict[str, Any]
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-07 17:21:26 +02:00
|
|
|
class WorkerTest(ZulipTestCase):
|
2017-11-05 11:49:43 +01:00
|
|
|
class FakeClient:
|
2017-11-05 10:51:25 +01:00
|
|
|
def __init__(self) -> None:
|
2020-10-10 04:54:09 +02:00
|
|
|
self.queues: Dict[str, List[Dict[str, Any]]] = defaultdict(list)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def enqueue(self, queue_name: str, data: Dict[str, Any]) -> None:
|
|
|
|
self.queues[queue_name].append(data)
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
def start_json_consumer(
|
|
|
|
self,
|
|
|
|
queue_name: str,
|
|
|
|
callback: Callable[[List[Dict[str, Any]]], None],
|
|
|
|
batch_size: int = 1,
|
|
|
|
timeout: Optional[int] = None,
|
|
|
|
) -> None:
|
2020-10-09 22:50:53 +02:00
|
|
|
chunk: List[Dict[str, Any]] = []
|
|
|
|
queue = self.queues[queue_name]
|
|
|
|
while queue:
|
|
|
|
chunk.append(queue.pop(0))
|
|
|
|
if len(chunk) >= batch_size or not len(queue):
|
|
|
|
callback(chunk)
|
|
|
|
chunk = []
|
|
|
|
|
queue: Rename queue_size, and update for all local queues.
Despite its name, the `queue_size` method does not return the number
of items in the queue; it returns the number of items that the local
consumer has delivered but unprocessed. These are often, but not
always, the same.
RabbitMQ's queues maintain the queue of unacknowledged messages; when
a consumer connects, it sends to the consumer some number of messages
to handle, known as the "prefetch." This is a performance
optimization, to ensure the consumer code does not need to wait for a
network round-trip before having new data to consume.
The default prefetch is 0, which means that RabbitMQ immediately dumps
all outstanding messages to the consumer, which slowly processes and
acknowledges them. If a second consumer were to connect to the same
queue, they would receive no messages to process, as the first
consumer has already been allocated them. If the first consumer
disconnects or crashes, all prior events sent to it are then made
available for other consumers on the queue.
The consumer does not know the total size of the queue -- merely how
many messages it has been handed.
No change is made to the prefetch here; however, future changes may
wish to limit the prefetch, either for memory-saving, or to allow
multiple consumers to work the same queue.
Rename the method to make clear that it only contains information
about the local queue in the consumer, not the full RabbitMQ queue.
Also include the waiting message count, which is used by the
`consume()` iterator for similar purpose to the pending events list.
2020-10-09 22:12:55 +02:00
|
|
|
def local_queue_size(self) -> int:
|
2020-10-10 04:54:09 +02:00
|
|
|
return sum([len(q) for q in self.queues.values()])
|
2020-03-18 20:48:49 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-18 02:06:20 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_UserActivityWorker(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
fake_client = self.FakeClient()
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
user = self.example_user("hamlet")
|
2019-09-18 02:06:20 +02:00
|
|
|
UserActivity.objects.filter(
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
user_profile=user.id,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
client=get_client("ios"),
|
2019-09-18 02:06:20 +02:00
|
|
|
).delete()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data = dict(
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
user_profile_id=user.id,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
client_id=get_client("ios").id,
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
time=time.time(),
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
query="send_message",
|
2019-09-18 02:06:20 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("user_activity", data)
|
2019-09-18 02:06:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-27 16:33:06 +01:00
|
|
|
# The block below adds an event using the old format,
|
|
|
|
# having the client name instead of id, to test the queue
|
|
|
|
# worker handles it correctly. That compatibility code can
|
|
|
|
# be deleted in a later release, and this test should then be cleaned up.
|
|
|
|
data_old_format = dict(
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
user_profile_id=user.id,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
client="ios",
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
time=time.time(),
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
query="send_message",
|
2020-03-27 16:33:06 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("user_activity", data_old_format)
|
2020-03-27 16:33:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-09 22:50:53 +02:00
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
|
|
|
worker = queue_processors.UserActivityWorker()
|
|
|
|
worker.setup()
|
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
|
|
|
activity_records = UserActivity.objects.filter(
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
user_profile=user.id,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
client=get_client("ios"),
|
2020-10-09 22:50:53 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(activity_records), 1)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(activity_records[0].count, 2)
|
2019-09-18 02:06:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-18 01:53:49 +02:00
|
|
|
# Now process the event a second time and confirm count goes
|
2020-03-27 16:33:06 +01:00
|
|
|
# up. Ideally, we'd use an event with a slightly newer
|
2019-09-18 01:53:49 +02:00
|
|
|
# time, but it's not really important.
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("user_activity", data)
|
2020-10-09 22:50:53 +02:00
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
|
|
|
worker = queue_processors.UserActivityWorker()
|
|
|
|
worker.setup()
|
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
|
|
|
activity_records = UserActivity.objects.filter(
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
user_profile=user.id,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
client=get_client("ios"),
|
2020-10-09 22:50:53 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(activity_records), 1)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(activity_records[0].count, 3)
|
2019-09-18 01:53:49 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_missed_message_worker(self) -> None:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
|
|
|
|
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
|
|
|
|
othello = self.example_user("othello")
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hamlet1_msg_id = self.send_personal_message(
|
2020-03-07 11:43:05 +01:00
|
|
|
from_user=cordelia,
|
|
|
|
to_user=hamlet,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
content="hi hamlet",
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hamlet2_msg_id = self.send_personal_message(
|
2020-03-07 11:43:05 +01:00
|
|
|
from_user=cordelia,
|
|
|
|
to_user=hamlet,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
content="goodbye hamlet",
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
queue_processors: Rewrite MissedMessageWorker to always wait.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes #6839.
2018-10-24 21:08:38 +02:00
|
|
|
hamlet3_msg_id = self.send_personal_message(
|
2020-03-07 11:43:05 +01:00
|
|
|
from_user=cordelia,
|
|
|
|
to_user=hamlet,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
content="hello again hamlet",
|
queue_processors: Rewrite MissedMessageWorker to always wait.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes #6839.
2018-10-24 21:08:38 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
othello_msg_id = self.send_personal_message(
|
2020-03-07 11:43:05 +01:00
|
|
|
from_user=cordelia,
|
|
|
|
to_user=othello,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
content="where art thou, othello?",
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
events = [
|
|
|
|
dict(user_profile_id=hamlet.id, message_id=hamlet1_msg_id),
|
|
|
|
dict(user_profile_id=hamlet.id, message_id=hamlet2_msg_id),
|
|
|
|
dict(user_profile_id=othello.id, message_id=othello_msg_id),
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fake_client = self.FakeClient()
|
|
|
|
for event in events:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("missedmessage_emails", event)
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mmw = MissedMessageWorker()
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
class MockTimer:
|
queue_processors: Rewrite MissedMessageWorker to always wait.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes #6839.
2018-10-24 21:08:38 +02:00
|
|
|
is_running = False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def is_alive(self) -> bool:
|
|
|
|
return self.is_running
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def start(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
self.is_running = True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
timer = MockTimer()
|
2020-10-10 04:55:50 +02:00
|
|
|
timer_mock = patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.worker.queue_processors.Timer",
|
queue_processors: Rewrite MissedMessageWorker to always wait.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes #6839.
2018-10-24 21:08:38 +02:00
|
|
|
return_value=timer,
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
send_mock = patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.lib.email_notifications.do_send_missedmessage_events_reply_in_zulip",
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
queue_processors: Rewrite MissedMessageWorker to always wait.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes #6839.
2018-10-24 21:08:38 +02:00
|
|
|
mmw.BATCH_DURATION = 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bonus_event = dict(user_profile_id=hamlet.id, message_id=hamlet3_msg_id)
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-10 04:55:50 +02:00
|
|
|
with send_mock as sm, timer_mock as tm:
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
queue_processors: Rewrite MissedMessageWorker to always wait.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes #6839.
2018-10-24 21:08:38 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(timer.is_alive())
|
|
|
|
mmw.setup()
|
|
|
|
mmw.start()
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(timer.is_alive())
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("missedmessage_emails", bonus_event)
|
queue_processors: Rewrite MissedMessageWorker to always wait.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes #6839.
2018-10-24 21:08:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Double-calling start is our way to get it to run again
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(timer.is_alive())
|
|
|
|
mmw.start()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
with self.assertLogs(level="INFO") as info_logs:
|
2020-07-26 19:09:09 +02:00
|
|
|
# Now, we actually send the emails.
|
|
|
|
mmw.maybe_send_batched_emails()
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
info_logs.output,
|
|
|
|
[
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"INFO:root:Batch-processing 3 missedmessage_emails events for user 10",
|
|
|
|
"INFO:root:Batch-processing 1 missedmessage_emails events for user 12",
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
)
|
queue_processors: Rewrite MissedMessageWorker to always wait.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes #6839.
2018-10-24 21:08:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
queue: Use locking to avoid race conditions in missedmessage_emails.
This queue had a race condition with creation of another Timer while
maybe_send_batched_emails is still doing its work, which may cause
two or more threads to be running maybe_send_batched_emails
at the same time, mutating the shared data simultaneously.
Another less likely potential race condition was that
maybe_send_batched_emails after sending out its email, can call
ensure_timer(). If the consume function is run simultaneously
in the main thread, it will call ensure_timer() too, which,
given unfortunate timings, might lead to both calls setting a new Timer.
We add locking to the queue to avoid such race conditions.
Tested manually, by print debugging with the following setup:
1. Making handle_missedmessage_emails sleep 2 seconds for each email,
and changed BATCH_DURATION to 1s to make the queue start working
right after launching.
2. Putting a bunch of events in the queue.
3. ./manage.py process_queue --queue_name missedmessage_emails
4. Once maybe_send_batched_emails is called and while it's processing
the events, I pushed more events to the queue. That triggers the
consume() function and ensure_timer().
Before implementing the locking mechanism, this causes two threads
to run maybe_send_batched_emails at the same time, mutating each other's
shared data, causing a traceback such as
Exception in thread Thread-3:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/threading.py", line 916, in _bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/threading.py", line 1182, in run
self.function(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
File "/srv/zulip/zerver/worker/queue_processors.py", line 507, in maybe_send_batched_emails
del self.events_by_recipient[user_profile_id]
KeyError: '5'
With the locking mechanism, things get handled as expected, and
ensure_timer() exits if it can't obtain the lock due to
maybe_send_batched_emails still working.
Co-authored-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@zulip.com>
2020-08-26 21:40:59 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mmw.timer_event, None)
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
queue_processors: Rewrite MissedMessageWorker to always wait.
Previously, MissedMessageWorker used a batching strategy of just
grabbing all the events from the last 2 minutes, and then sending them
off as emails. This suffered from the problem that you had a random
time, between 0s and 120s, to edit your message before it would be
sent out via an email.
Additionally, this made the queue had to monitor, because it was
expected to pile up large numbers of events, even if everything was
fine.
We fix this by batching together the events using a timer; the queue
processor itself just tracks the items, and then a timer-handler
process takes care of ensuring that the emails get sent at least 120s
(and at most 130s) after the first triggering message was sent in Zulip.
This introduces a new unpleasant bug, namely that when we restart a
Zulip server, we can now lose some missed_message email events;
further work is required on this point.
Fixes #6839.
2018-10-24 21:08:38 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(tm.call_args[0][0], 5) # should sleep 5 seconds
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
args = [c[0] for c in sm.call_args_list]
|
|
|
|
arg_dict = {
|
|
|
|
arg[0].id: dict(
|
|
|
|
missed_messages=arg[1],
|
|
|
|
count=arg[2],
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
for arg in args
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hamlet_info = arg_dict[hamlet.id]
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(hamlet_info["count"], 3)
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
{m["message"].content for m in hamlet_info["missed_messages"]},
|
|
|
|
{"hi hamlet", "goodbye hamlet", "hello again hamlet"},
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
othello_info = arg_dict[othello.id]
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(othello_info["count"], 1)
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
{m["message"].content for m in othello_info["missed_messages"]},
|
|
|
|
{"where art thou, othello?"},
|
2017-11-15 15:27:41 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_push_notifications_worker(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
The push notifications system has its own comprehensive test suite,
|
|
|
|
so we can limit ourselves to simple unit testing the queue processor,
|
|
|
|
without going deeper into the system - by mocking the handle_push_notification
|
|
|
|
functions to immediately produce the effect we want, to test its handling by the queue
|
|
|
|
processor.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
fake_client = self.FakeClient()
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
def fake_publish(
|
|
|
|
queue_name: str, event: Dict[str, Any], processor: Callable[[Any], None]
|
|
|
|
) -> None:
|
2020-10-10 04:54:09 +02:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue(queue_name, event)
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def generate_new_message_notification() -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
|
|
|
return build_offline_notification(1, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def generate_remove_notification() -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
|
|
"type": "remove",
|
|
|
|
"user_profile_id": 1,
|
|
|
|
"message_ids": [1],
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
|
|
|
worker = queue_processors.PushNotificationsWorker()
|
|
|
|
worker.setup()
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
with patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.worker.queue_processors.handle_push_notification"
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
) as mock_handle_new, patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.worker.queue_processors.handle_remove_push_notification"
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
) as mock_handle_remove, patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.worker.queue_processors.initialize_push_notifications"
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
):
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
event_new = generate_new_message_notification()
|
|
|
|
event_remove = generate_remove_notification()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("missedmessage_mobile_notifications", event_new)
|
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("missedmessage_mobile_notifications", event_remove)
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
mock_handle_new.assert_called_once_with(event_new["user_profile_id"], event_new)
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
mock_handle_remove.assert_called_once_with(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
event_remove["user_profile_id"], event_remove["message_ids"]
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.worker.queue_processors.handle_push_notification",
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
side_effect=PushNotificationBouncerRetryLaterError("test"),
|
|
|
|
) as mock_handle_new, patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.worker.queue_processors.handle_remove_push_notification",
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
side_effect=PushNotificationBouncerRetryLaterError("test"),
|
|
|
|
) as mock_handle_remove, patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.worker.queue_processors.initialize_push_notifications"
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
):
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
event_new = generate_new_message_notification()
|
|
|
|
event_remove = generate_remove_notification()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("missedmessage_mobile_notifications", event_new)
|
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("missedmessage_mobile_notifications", event_remove)
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
with mock_queue_publish(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.lib.queue.queue_json_publish", side_effect=fake_publish
|
|
|
|
), self.assertLogs("zerver.worker.queue_processors", "WARNING") as warn_logs:
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mock_handle_new.call_count, 1 + MAX_REQUEST_RETRIES)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mock_handle_remove.call_count, 1 + MAX_REQUEST_RETRIES)
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
warn_logs.output,
|
|
|
|
[
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"WARNING:zerver.worker.queue_processors:Maximum retries exceeded for trigger:1 event:push_notification",
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
* 2,
|
|
|
|
)
|
2019-12-02 19:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
@patch("zerver.worker.queue_processors.mirror_email")
|
2019-03-18 08:09:54 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_mirror_worker(self, mock_mirror_email: MagicMock) -> None:
|
2017-04-05 11:46:14 +02:00
|
|
|
fake_client = self.FakeClient()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
stream = get_stream("Denmark", get_realm("zulip"))
|
2019-03-18 08:09:54 +01:00
|
|
|
stream_to_address = encode_email_address(stream)
|
2017-04-05 11:46:14 +02:00
|
|
|
data = [
|
|
|
|
dict(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
msg_base64=base64.b64encode(b"\xf3test").decode(),
|
2017-04-05 11:46:14 +02:00
|
|
|
time=time.time(),
|
python: Use trailing commas consistently.
Automatically generated by the following script, based on the output
of lint with flake8-comma:
import re
import sys
last_filename = None
last_row = None
lines = []
for msg in sys.stdin:
m = re.match(
r"\x1b\[35mflake8 \|\x1b\[0m \x1b\[1;31m(.+):(\d+):(\d+): (\w+)", msg
)
if m:
filename, row_str, col_str, err = m.groups()
row, col = int(row_str), int(col_str)
if filename == last_filename:
assert last_row != row
else:
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
last_filename = filename
last_row = row
line = lines[row - 1]
if err in ["C812", "C815"]:
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 1] + "," + line[col - 1 :]
elif err in ["C819"]:
assert line[col - 2] == ","
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 2] + line[col - 1 :].lstrip(" ")
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
2020-04-10 05:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
rcpt_to=stream_to_address,
|
|
|
|
),
|
2019-03-18 08:09:54 +01:00
|
|
|
] * 3
|
2017-04-05 11:46:14 +02:00
|
|
|
for element in data:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("email_mirror", element)
|
2017-04-05 11:46:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-18 08:09:54 +01:00
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
|
|
|
worker = queue_processors.MirrorWorker()
|
|
|
|
worker.setup()
|
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mock_mirror_email.call_count, 3)
|
2017-04-05 11:46:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
@patch("zerver.worker.queue_processors.mirror_email")
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
@override_settings(RATE_LIMITING_MIRROR_REALM_RULES=[(10, 2)])
|
2020-12-23 21:45:16 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_mirror_worker_rate_limiting(self, mock_mirror_email: MagicMock) -> None:
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client = self.FakeClient()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
realm = get_realm("zulip")
|
2020-03-04 14:05:25 +01:00
|
|
|
RateLimitedRealmMirror(realm).clear_history()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
stream = get_stream("Denmark", realm)
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
stream_to_address = encode_email_address(stream)
|
|
|
|
data = [
|
|
|
|
dict(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
msg_base64=base64.b64encode(b"\xf3test").decode(),
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
time=time.time(),
|
python: Use trailing commas consistently.
Automatically generated by the following script, based on the output
of lint with flake8-comma:
import re
import sys
last_filename = None
last_row = None
lines = []
for msg in sys.stdin:
m = re.match(
r"\x1b\[35mflake8 \|\x1b\[0m \x1b\[1;31m(.+):(\d+):(\d+): (\w+)", msg
)
if m:
filename, row_str, col_str, err = m.groups()
row, col = int(row_str), int(col_str)
if filename == last_filename:
assert last_row != row
else:
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
last_filename = filename
last_row = row
line = lines[row - 1]
if err in ["C812", "C815"]:
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 1] + "," + line[col - 1 :]
elif err in ["C819"]:
assert line[col - 2] == ","
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 2] + line[col - 1 :].lstrip(" ")
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
2020-04-10 05:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
rcpt_to=stream_to_address,
|
|
|
|
),
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
] * 5
|
|
|
|
for element in data:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("email_mirror", element)
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client), self.assertLogs(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.worker.queue_processors", level="WARNING"
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
) as warn_logs:
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
start_time = time.time()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
with patch("time.time", return_value=start_time):
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
worker = queue_processors.MirrorWorker()
|
|
|
|
worker.setup()
|
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
|
|
|
# Of the first 5 messages, only 2 should be processed
|
|
|
|
# (the rest being rate-limited):
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mock_mirror_email.call_count, 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If a new message is sent into the stream mirror, it will get rejected:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("email_mirror", data[0])
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mock_mirror_email.call_count, 2)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-20 23:27:25 +02:00
|
|
|
# However, message notification emails don't get rate limited:
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
with self.settings(EMAIL_GATEWAY_PATTERN="%s@example.com"):
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
address = "mm" + ("x" * 32) + "@example.com"
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
event = dict(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
msg_base64=base64.b64encode(b"\xf3test").decode(),
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
time=time.time(),
|
python: Use trailing commas consistently.
Automatically generated by the following script, based on the output
of lint with flake8-comma:
import re
import sys
last_filename = None
last_row = None
lines = []
for msg in sys.stdin:
m = re.match(
r"\x1b\[35mflake8 \|\x1b\[0m \x1b\[1;31m(.+):(\d+):(\d+): (\w+)", msg
)
if m:
filename, row_str, col_str, err = m.groups()
row, col = int(row_str), int(col_str)
if filename == last_filename:
assert last_row != row
else:
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
with open(filename) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
last_filename = filename
last_row = row
line = lines[row - 1]
if err in ["C812", "C815"]:
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 1] + "," + line[col - 1 :]
elif err in ["C819"]:
assert line[col - 2] == ","
lines[row - 1] = line[: col - 2] + line[col - 1 :].lstrip(" ")
if last_filename is not None:
with open(last_filename, "w") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
2020-04-10 05:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
rcpt_to=address,
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("email_mirror", event)
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mock_mirror_email.call_count, 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# After some times passes, emails get accepted again:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
with patch("time.time", return_value=(start_time + 11.0)):
|
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("email_mirror", data[0])
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mock_mirror_email.call_count, 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If RateLimiterLockingException is thrown, we rate-limit the new message:
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
with patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.lib.rate_limiter.RedisRateLimiterBackend.incr_ratelimit",
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
side_effect=RateLimiterLockingException,
|
|
|
|
):
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
with self.assertLogs("zerver.lib.rate_limiter", "WARNING") as mock_warn:
|
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("email_mirror", data[0])
|
2020-12-23 21:45:16 +01:00
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mock_mirror_email.call_count, 4)
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
mock_warn.output,
|
|
|
|
[
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"WARNING:zerver.lib.rate_limiter:Deadlock trying to incr_ratelimit for RateLimitedRealmMirror:zulip"
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
warn_logs.output,
|
|
|
|
[
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"WARNING:zerver.worker.queue_processors:MirrorWorker: Rejecting an email from: None to realm: Zulip Dev - rate limited."
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
* 5,
|
|
|
|
)
|
2019-03-16 11:39:09 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-05 10:51:25 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_email_sending_worker_retries(self) -> None:
|
2017-09-15 09:38:12 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Tests the retry_send_email_failures decorator to make sure it
|
|
|
|
retries sending the email 3 times and then gives up."""
|
|
|
|
fake_client = self.FakeClient()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-30 20:06:23 +01:00
|
|
|
data = {
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"template_prefix": "zerver/emails/confirm_new_email",
|
|
|
|
"to_emails": [self.example_email("hamlet")],
|
|
|
|
"from_name": "Zulip Account Security",
|
|
|
|
"from_address": FromAddress.NOREPLY,
|
|
|
|
"context": {},
|
2018-01-30 20:06:23 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("email_senders", data)
|
2017-09-15 09:38:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
def fake_publish(
|
|
|
|
queue_name: str, event: Dict[str, Any], processor: Optional[Callable[[Any], None]]
|
|
|
|
) -> None:
|
2020-10-10 04:54:09 +02:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue(queue_name, event)
|
2017-09-15 09:38:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
2017-11-29 08:25:57 +01:00
|
|
|
worker = queue_processors.EmailSendingWorker()
|
2017-09-15 09:38:12 +02:00
|
|
|
worker.setup()
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
with patch(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.lib.send_email.build_email", side_effect=smtplib.SMTPServerDisconnected
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
), mock_queue_publish(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"zerver.lib.queue.queue_json_publish", side_effect=fake_publish
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
), self.assertLogs(
|
|
|
|
level="ERROR"
|
|
|
|
) as m:
|
2017-09-15 09:38:12 +02:00
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
2020-12-23 21:45:16 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn("failed due to exception SMTPServerDisconnected", m.output[0])
|
2017-09-15 09:38:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(data["failed_tries"], 1 + MAX_REQUEST_RETRIES)
|
2017-09-15 09:38:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-07 00:58:34 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_invites_worker(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
fake_client = self.FakeClient()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
inviter = self.example_user("iago")
|
2017-12-05 09:01:41 +01:00
|
|
|
prereg_alice = PreregistrationUser.objects.create(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
email=self.nonreg_email("alice"), referred_by=inviter, realm=inviter.realm
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2017-12-07 06:45:18 +01:00
|
|
|
PreregistrationUser.objects.create(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
email=self.nonreg_email("bob"), referred_by=inviter, realm=inviter.realm
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2020-10-10 04:54:09 +02:00
|
|
|
data: List[Dict[str, Any]] = [
|
2019-12-02 15:28:32 +01:00
|
|
|
dict(prereg_id=prereg_alice.id, referrer_id=inviter.id, email_body=None),
|
2017-12-05 09:01:41 +01:00
|
|
|
# Nonexistent prereg_id, as if the invitation was deleted
|
2019-12-02 15:28:32 +01:00
|
|
|
dict(prereg_id=-1, referrer_id=inviter.id, email_body=None),
|
2017-12-07 00:58:34 +01:00
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
for element in data:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("invites", element)
|
2017-12-07 00:58:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
|
|
|
worker = queue_processors.ConfirmationEmailWorker()
|
|
|
|
worker.setup()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
with patch("zerver.lib.actions.send_email"), patch(
|
|
|
|
"zerver.worker.queue_processors.send_future_email"
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
) as send_mock:
|
2017-12-07 00:58:34 +01:00
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
2021-02-11 18:21:44 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(send_mock.call_count, 1)
|
2017-12-07 00:58:34 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-05 10:51:25 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_error_handling(self) -> None:
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
processed = []
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
@queue_processors.assign_queue("unreliable_worker", is_test_queue=True)
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
class UnreliableWorker(queue_processors.QueueProcessingWorker):
|
2017-11-05 10:51:25 +01:00
|
|
|
def consume(self, data: Mapping[str, Any]) -> None:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
if data["type"] == "unexpected behaviour":
|
|
|
|
raise Exception("Worker task not performing as expected!")
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
processed.append(data["type"])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fake_client = self.FakeClient()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
for msg in ["good", "fine", "unexpected behaviour", "back to normal"]:
|
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("unreliable_worker", {"type": msg})
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fn = os.path.join(settings.QUEUE_ERROR_DIR, "unreliable_worker.errors")
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
os.remove(fn)
|
|
|
|
except OSError: # nocoverage # error handling for the directory not existing
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
|
|
|
worker = UnreliableWorker()
|
|
|
|
worker.setup()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
with self.assertLogs(level="ERROR") as m:
|
2018-02-25 20:41:51 +01:00
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
m.records[0].message, "Problem handling data on queue unreliable_worker"
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2020-12-23 21:45:16 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(m.records[0].stack_info, m.output[0])
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(processed, ["good", "fine", "back to normal"])
|
2020-04-09 21:51:58 +02:00
|
|
|
with open(fn) as f:
|
2019-07-14 21:37:08 +02:00
|
|
|
line = f.readline().strip()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
events = orjson.loads(line.split("\t")[1])
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assert_length(events, 1)
|
|
|
|
event = events[0]
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(event["type"], "unexpected behaviour")
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
processed = []
|
2020-06-03 06:02:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
@queue_processors.assign_queue("unreliable_loopworker", is_test_queue=True)
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
class UnreliableLoopWorker(queue_processors.LoopQueueProcessingWorker):
|
|
|
|
def consume_batch(self, events: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> None:
|
|
|
|
for event in events:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
if event["type"] == "unexpected behaviour":
|
|
|
|
raise Exception("Worker task not performing as expected!")
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
processed.append(event["type"])
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
for msg in ["good", "fine", "unexpected behaviour", "back to normal"]:
|
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("unreliable_loopworker", {"type": msg})
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fn = os.path.join(settings.QUEUE_ERROR_DIR, "unreliable_loopworker.errors")
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
os.remove(fn)
|
|
|
|
except OSError: # nocoverage # error handling for the directory not existing
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-09 22:50:53 +02:00
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
loopworker = UnreliableLoopWorker()
|
|
|
|
loopworker.setup()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
with self.assertLogs(level="ERROR") as m:
|
2020-10-09 22:50:53 +02:00
|
|
|
loopworker.start()
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
m.records[0].message, "Problem handling data on queue unreliable_loopworker"
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2020-12-23 21:45:16 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(m.records[0].stack_info, m.output[0])
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(processed, ["good", "fine"])
|
2020-04-09 21:51:58 +02:00
|
|
|
with open(fn) as f:
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
line = f.readline().strip()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
events = orjson.loads(line.split("\t")[1])
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assert_length(events, 4)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
[event["type"] for event in events],
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
["good", "fine", "unexpected behaviour", "back to normal"],
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2019-12-26 21:11:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_timeouts(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
processed = []
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
@queue_processors.assign_queue("timeout_worker", is_test_queue=True)
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
class TimeoutWorker(queue_processors.QueueProcessingWorker):
|
|
|
|
MAX_CONSUME_SECONDS = 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def consume(self, data: Mapping[str, Any]) -> None:
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
if data["type"] == "timeout":
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
time.sleep(5)
|
|
|
|
processed.append(data["type"])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fake_client = self.FakeClient()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
for msg in ["good", "fine", "timeout", "back to normal"]:
|
|
|
|
fake_client.enqueue("timeout_worker", {"type": msg})
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
fn = os.path.join(settings.QUEUE_ERROR_DIR, "timeout_worker.errors")
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
os.remove(fn)
|
|
|
|
except OSError: # nocoverage # error handling for the directory not existing
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with simulated_queue_client(lambda: fake_client):
|
|
|
|
worker = TimeoutWorker()
|
|
|
|
worker.setup()
|
|
|
|
worker.ENABLE_TIMEOUTS = True
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
with self.assertLogs(level="ERROR") as m:
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
worker.start()
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
m.records[0].message,
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
"Timed out after 1 seconds processing 1 events in queue timeout_worker",
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2020-12-23 21:45:16 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(m.records[0].stack_info, m.output[0])
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(processed, ["good", "fine", "back to normal"])
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
with open(fn) as f:
|
|
|
|
line = f.readline().strip()
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
events = orjson.loads(line.split("\t")[1])
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assert_length(events, 1)
|
|
|
|
event = events[0]
|
2021-02-12 08:20:45 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(event["type"], "timeout")
|
2020-09-29 01:16:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-05 10:51:25 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_worker_noname(self) -> None:
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
class TestWorker(queue_processors.QueueProcessingWorker):
|
2017-11-05 10:51:25 +01:00
|
|
|
def __init__(self) -> None:
|
2017-10-27 08:28:23 +02:00
|
|
|
super().__init__()
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-05 10:51:25 +01:00
|
|
|
def consume(self, data: Mapping[str, Any]) -> None:
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
pass # nocoverage # this is intentionally not called
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-08 12:18:27 +01:00
|
|
|
with self.assertRaises(queue_processors.WorkerDeclarationException):
|
|
|
|
TestWorker()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-10 15:00:45 +01:00
|
|
|
def test_get_active_worker_queues(self) -> None:
|
2020-10-24 02:24:10 +02:00
|
|
|
test_queue_names = set(get_active_worker_queues(only_test_queues=True))
|
|
|
|
# Actually 6, but test_timeouts, which defines TimeoutWorker,
|
|
|
|
# is called after this
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(5, len(test_queue_names))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This misses that TestWorker, defined in test_worker_noname
|
|
|
|
# with no assign_queue, because it runs after this
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-10 22:32:01 +01:00
|
|
|
worker_queue_names = {
|
|
|
|
queue_class.queue_name
|
|
|
|
for base in [QueueProcessingWorker, EmailSendingWorker, LoopQueueProcessingWorker]
|
|
|
|
for queue_class in base.__subclasses__()
|
|
|
|
if not isabstract(queue_class)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-02-12 08:19:30 +01:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(set(get_active_worker_queues()), worker_queue_names - test_queue_names)
|