zulip/zerver/lib/test_fixtures.py

210 lines
7.8 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
import json
import os
import re
import hashlib
import subprocess
import sys
from typing import Any, List, Optional
from importlib import import_module
from io import StringIO
from django.db import connections, DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS
from django.db.utils import OperationalError
from django.apps import apps
from django.conf import settings
from django.core.management import call_command
from django.utils.module_loading import module_has_submodule
sys.path.append(os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(__file__))))
from scripts.lib.zulip_tools import get_dev_uuid_var_path, run
UUID_VAR_DIR = get_dev_uuid_var_path()
FILENAME_SPLITTER = re.compile(r'[\W\-_]')
def run_db_migrations(platform: str) -> None:
if platform == 'dev':
migration_status_file = 'migration_status_dev'
settings = 'zproject.settings'
test_fixtures: Fix bug with run_db_migrations for test platform. In this commit we are fixing a kinda serious un-noticed bug with the way run_db_migrations worked for test db. Basically run_db_migrations runs new migrations on db (dev or test). When we talk about the dev platform this process is straight forward. We have a single DB zulip which was once created and now has some data. Introduction of new migration causes a schema change or does something else but bottom line being we just migrate the zulip DB and stuff works fine. Now coming to zulip test db (zulip_test) situation is a bit complex in comparision to dev db. Basically this is because we make use of what we call zulip_test_template to make test fixture restoration after tests run fast. Now before we introduced the performance optimisation of just doing migrations when possible, introduction of a migration would ideally result in provisioning do a full rebuild of the test database. When that used to happen sequence of events used to be something like this: * Create a zulip_test db from zulip_test_base template (An absolute basic schema holding) * Migrate and populate the zulip_test db. * Create/Re-create zulip_test_template from the latest zulip_test. Now after we introduced just do migrations instead of full db rebuild when possible, what used to happen was that zulip_test db got successfully migrated but when test suites would run they would try to create zulip_test from zulip_test_template (so that individual tests don't affect each other on db level). This is where the problem resides; zulip_test_template wasn't migrated and we just scrapped zulip_test and re-created it using zulip_test_template as a template and hence zulip_test will not hold the latest schema. This is what we fix in this commit.
2018-07-09 08:56:55 +02:00
db_name = 'ZULIP_DB_NAME=zulip'
elif platform == 'test':
migration_status_file = 'migration_status_test'
settings = 'zproject.test_settings'
test_fixtures: Fix bug with run_db_migrations for test platform. In this commit we are fixing a kinda serious un-noticed bug with the way run_db_migrations worked for test db. Basically run_db_migrations runs new migrations on db (dev or test). When we talk about the dev platform this process is straight forward. We have a single DB zulip which was once created and now has some data. Introduction of new migration causes a schema change or does something else but bottom line being we just migrate the zulip DB and stuff works fine. Now coming to zulip test db (zulip_test) situation is a bit complex in comparision to dev db. Basically this is because we make use of what we call zulip_test_template to make test fixture restoration after tests run fast. Now before we introduced the performance optimisation of just doing migrations when possible, introduction of a migration would ideally result in provisioning do a full rebuild of the test database. When that used to happen sequence of events used to be something like this: * Create a zulip_test db from zulip_test_base template (An absolute basic schema holding) * Migrate and populate the zulip_test db. * Create/Re-create zulip_test_template from the latest zulip_test. Now after we introduced just do migrations instead of full db rebuild when possible, what used to happen was that zulip_test db got successfully migrated but when test suites would run they would try to create zulip_test from zulip_test_template (so that individual tests don't affect each other on db level). This is where the problem resides; zulip_test_template wasn't migrated and we just scrapped zulip_test and re-created it using zulip_test_template as a template and hence zulip_test will not hold the latest schema. This is what we fix in this commit.
2018-07-09 08:56:55 +02:00
db_name = 'ZULIP_DB_NAME=zulip_test_template'
# We shell out to `manage.py` and pass `DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE` on
# the command line rather than just calling the migration
# functions, because Django doesn't support changing settings like
# what the database is as runtime.
test_fixtures: Fix bug with run_db_migrations for test platform. In this commit we are fixing a kinda serious un-noticed bug with the way run_db_migrations worked for test db. Basically run_db_migrations runs new migrations on db (dev or test). When we talk about the dev platform this process is straight forward. We have a single DB zulip which was once created and now has some data. Introduction of new migration causes a schema change or does something else but bottom line being we just migrate the zulip DB and stuff works fine. Now coming to zulip test db (zulip_test) situation is a bit complex in comparision to dev db. Basically this is because we make use of what we call zulip_test_template to make test fixture restoration after tests run fast. Now before we introduced the performance optimisation of just doing migrations when possible, introduction of a migration would ideally result in provisioning do a full rebuild of the test database. When that used to happen sequence of events used to be something like this: * Create a zulip_test db from zulip_test_base template (An absolute basic schema holding) * Migrate and populate the zulip_test db. * Create/Re-create zulip_test_template from the latest zulip_test. Now after we introduced just do migrations instead of full db rebuild when possible, what used to happen was that zulip_test db got successfully migrated but when test suites would run they would try to create zulip_test from zulip_test_template (so that individual tests don't affect each other on db level). This is where the problem resides; zulip_test_template wasn't migrated and we just scrapped zulip_test and re-created it using zulip_test_template as a template and hence zulip_test will not hold the latest schema. This is what we fix in this commit.
2018-07-09 08:56:55 +02:00
# Also we export DB_NAME which is ignored by dev platform but
# recognised by test platform and used to migrate correct db.
run(['env', ('DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=%s' % (settings,)), db_name,
test_fixtures: Fix bug with run_db_migrations for test platform. In this commit we are fixing a kinda serious un-noticed bug with the way run_db_migrations worked for test db. Basically run_db_migrations runs new migrations on db (dev or test). When we talk about the dev platform this process is straight forward. We have a single DB zulip which was once created and now has some data. Introduction of new migration causes a schema change or does something else but bottom line being we just migrate the zulip DB and stuff works fine. Now coming to zulip test db (zulip_test) situation is a bit complex in comparision to dev db. Basically this is because we make use of what we call zulip_test_template to make test fixture restoration after tests run fast. Now before we introduced the performance optimisation of just doing migrations when possible, introduction of a migration would ideally result in provisioning do a full rebuild of the test database. When that used to happen sequence of events used to be something like this: * Create a zulip_test db from zulip_test_base template (An absolute basic schema holding) * Migrate and populate the zulip_test db. * Create/Re-create zulip_test_template from the latest zulip_test. Now after we introduced just do migrations instead of full db rebuild when possible, what used to happen was that zulip_test db got successfully migrated but when test suites would run they would try to create zulip_test from zulip_test_template (so that individual tests don't affect each other on db level). This is where the problem resides; zulip_test_template wasn't migrated and we just scrapped zulip_test and re-created it using zulip_test_template as a template and hence zulip_test will not hold the latest schema. This is what we fix in this commit.
2018-07-09 08:56:55 +02:00
'./manage.py', 'migrate', '--no-input'])
run(['env', ('DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=%s' % (settings,)), db_name,
test_fixtures: Fix bug with run_db_migrations for test platform. In this commit we are fixing a kinda serious un-noticed bug with the way run_db_migrations worked for test db. Basically run_db_migrations runs new migrations on db (dev or test). When we talk about the dev platform this process is straight forward. We have a single DB zulip which was once created and now has some data. Introduction of new migration causes a schema change or does something else but bottom line being we just migrate the zulip DB and stuff works fine. Now coming to zulip test db (zulip_test) situation is a bit complex in comparision to dev db. Basically this is because we make use of what we call zulip_test_template to make test fixture restoration after tests run fast. Now before we introduced the performance optimisation of just doing migrations when possible, introduction of a migration would ideally result in provisioning do a full rebuild of the test database. When that used to happen sequence of events used to be something like this: * Create a zulip_test db from zulip_test_base template (An absolute basic schema holding) * Migrate and populate the zulip_test db. * Create/Re-create zulip_test_template from the latest zulip_test. Now after we introduced just do migrations instead of full db rebuild when possible, what used to happen was that zulip_test db got successfully migrated but when test suites would run they would try to create zulip_test from zulip_test_template (so that individual tests don't affect each other on db level). This is where the problem resides; zulip_test_template wasn't migrated and we just scrapped zulip_test and re-created it using zulip_test_template as a template and hence zulip_test will not hold the latest schema. This is what we fix in this commit.
2018-07-09 08:56:55 +02:00
'./manage.py', 'get_migration_status',
'--output=%s' % (migration_status_file,)])
def run_generate_fixtures_if_required(use_force: bool=False) -> None:
generate_fixtures_command = ['tools/setup/generate-fixtures']
test_template_db_status = template_database_status()
if use_force or test_template_db_status == 'needs_rebuild':
generate_fixtures_command.append('--force')
elif test_template_db_status == 'run_migrations':
run_db_migrations('test')
subprocess.check_call(generate_fixtures_command)
def database_exists(database_name: str, **options: Any) -> bool:
db = options.get('database', DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS)
try:
connection = connections[db]
with connection.cursor() as cursor:
cursor.execute("SELECT 1 from pg_database WHERE datname='{}';".format(database_name))
return_value = bool(cursor.fetchone())
connections.close_all()
return return_value
except OperationalError:
return False
def get_migration_status(**options: Any) -> str:
verbosity = options.get('verbosity', 1)
for app_config in apps.get_app_configs():
if module_has_submodule(app_config.module, "management"):
import_module('.management', app_config.name)
app_label = options['app_label'] if options.get('app_label') else None
db = options.get('database', DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS)
out = StringIO()
call_command(
'showmigrations',
'--list',
app_label=app_label,
database=db,
no_color=options.get('no_color', False),
settings=options.get('settings', os.environ['DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE']),
stdout=out,
traceback=options.get('traceback', True),
verbosity=verbosity,
)
connections.close_all()
out.seek(0)
output = out.read()
return re.sub(r'\x1b\[(1|0)m', '', output)
def extract_migrations_as_list(migration_status: str) -> List[str]:
MIGRATIONS_RE = re.compile(r'\[[X| ]\] (\d+_.+)\n')
return MIGRATIONS_RE.findall(migration_status)
def what_to_do_with_migrations(migration_file: str, **options: Any) -> str:
if not os.path.exists(migration_file):
return 'scrap'
with open(migration_file) as f:
previous_migration_status = f.read()
current_migration_status = get_migration_status(**options)
all_curr_migrations = extract_migrations_as_list(current_migration_status)
all_prev_migrations = extract_migrations_as_list(previous_migration_status)
if len(all_curr_migrations) < len(all_prev_migrations):
return 'scrap'
for migration in all_prev_migrations:
if migration not in all_curr_migrations:
return 'scrap'
if len(all_curr_migrations) == len(all_prev_migrations):
return 'migrations_are_latest'
return 'migrate'
def _get_hash_file_path(source_file_path: str, status_dir: str) -> str:
basename = os.path.basename(source_file_path)
filename = '_'.join(FILENAME_SPLITTER.split(basename)).lower()
return os.path.join(status_dir, filename)
def _check_hash(source_hash_file: str, target_content: str) -> bool:
"""
This function has a side effect of creating a new hash file or
updating the old hash file.
"""
target_hash_content = hashlib.sha1(target_content.encode('utf8')).hexdigest()
if not os.path.exists(source_hash_file):
source_hash_content = None
else:
with open(source_hash_file) as f:
source_hash_content = f.read().strip()
with open(source_hash_file, 'w') as f:
f.write(target_hash_content)
return source_hash_content == target_hash_content
def check_file_hash(target_file_path: str, status_dir: str) -> bool:
source_hash_file = _get_hash_file_path(target_file_path, status_dir)
with open(target_file_path) as f:
target_content = f.read()
return _check_hash(source_hash_file, target_content)
def check_setting_hash(setting_name: str, status_dir: str) -> bool:
hash_filename = '_'.join(['settings', setting_name])
source_hash_file = os.path.join(status_dir, hash_filename)
target_content = json.dumps(getattr(settings, setting_name), sort_keys=True)
return _check_hash(source_hash_file, target_content)
def template_database_status(
database_name: str='zulip_test_template',
migration_status: Optional[str]=None,
settings: str='zproject.test_settings',
status_dir: Optional[str]=None,
check_files: Optional[List[str]]=None,
check_settings: Optional[List[str]]=None) -> str:
# This function returns a status string specifying the type of
# state the template db is in and thus the kind of action required.
if check_files is None:
check_files = [
'zilencer/management/commands/populate_db.py',
'zerver/lib/bulk_create.py',
'zerver/lib/generate_test_data.py',
'tools/setup/postgres-init-test-db',
'tools/setup/postgres-init-dev-db',
]
if check_settings is None:
check_settings = [
'REALM_INTERNAL_BOTS',
]
if status_dir is None:
status_dir = os.path.join(UUID_VAR_DIR, 'test_db_status')
if migration_status is None:
migration_status = os.path.join(UUID_VAR_DIR, 'migration_status_test')
if not os.path.exists(status_dir):
os.mkdir(status_dir)
if database_exists(database_name):
# To ensure Python evaluates all the hash tests (and thus creates the
# hash files about the current state), we evaluate them in a
# list and then process the result
files_hash_status = all([check_file_hash(fn, status_dir) for fn in check_files])
settings_hash_status = all([check_setting_hash(setting_name, status_dir)
for setting_name in check_settings])
hash_status = files_hash_status and settings_hash_status
if not hash_status:
return 'needs_rebuild'
migration_op = what_to_do_with_migrations(migration_status, settings=settings)
if migration_op == 'scrap':
return 'needs_rebuild'
if migration_op == 'migrate':
return 'run_migrations'
return 'current'
return 'needs_rebuild'