zulip/zerver/tests/test_event_queue.py

831 lines
33 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

import time
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
from typing import Any, Callable, Collection, Dict, List
from unittest import mock
import orjson
from django.http import HttpRequest, HttpResponse
from zerver.lib.actions import do_change_subscription_property, do_mute_topic
from zerver.lib.test_classes import ZulipTestCase
from zerver.lib.test_helpers import HostRequestMock, mock_queue_publish
from zerver.models import Recipient, Stream, Subscription, UserProfile, get_stream
from zerver.tornado.event_queue import (
ClientDescriptor,
allocate_client_descriptor,
get_client_descriptor,
maybe_enqueue_notifications,
missedmessage_hook,
persistent_queue_filename,
process_notification,
)
from zerver.tornado.views import cleanup_event_queue, get_events
class MissedMessageNotificationsTest(ZulipTestCase):
"""Tests the logic for when missed-message notifications
should be triggered, based on user settings"""
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
def test_maybe_enqueue_notifications(self) -> None:
# We've already tested the "when to send notifications" logic as part of the
# notification_data module.
# This test is for verifying whether `maybe_enqueue_notifications` returns the
# `already_notified` data correctly.
params = self.get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters(
message_id=1, user_id=1, sender_id=2
)
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
with mock_queue_publish(
"zerver.tornado.event_queue.queue_json_publish"
) as mock_queue_json_publish:
notified = maybe_enqueue_notifications(**params)
mock_queue_json_publish.assert_not_called()
with mock_queue_publish(
"zerver.tornado.event_queue.queue_json_publish"
) as mock_queue_json_publish:
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
params["private_message"] = True
notified = maybe_enqueue_notifications(**params)
self.assertTrue(mock_queue_json_publish.call_count, 2)
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
queues_pushed = [entry[0][0] for entry in mock_queue_json_publish.call_args_list]
self.assertIn("missedmessage_mobile_notifications", queues_pushed)
self.assertIn("missedmessage_emails", queues_pushed)
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
self.assertTrue(notified["email_notified"])
self.assertTrue(notified["push_notified"])
def tornado_call(
self,
view_func: Callable[[HttpRequest, UserProfile], HttpResponse],
user_profile: UserProfile,
post_data: Dict[str, Any],
) -> HttpResponse:
request = HostRequestMock(post_data, user_profile)
return view_func(request, user_profile)
def test_stream_watchers(self) -> None:
"""
We used to have a bug with stream_watchers, where we set their flags to
None.
"""
cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
realm = hamlet.realm
stream_name = "Denmark"
self.unsubscribe(hamlet, stream_name)
queue_data = dict(
all_public_streams=True,
apply_markdown=True,
client_gravatar=True,
client_type_name="home grown API program",
event_types=["message"],
last_connection_time=time.time(),
queue_timeout=0,
realm_id=realm.id,
user_profile_id=hamlet.id,
)
client = allocate_client_descriptor(queue_data)
self.send_stream_message(cordelia, stream_name)
self.assert_length(client.event_queue.contents(), 1)
# This next line of code should silently succeed and basically do
# nothing under the covers. This test is here to prevent a bug
# from re-appearing.
missedmessage_hook(
user_profile_id=hamlet.id,
client=client,
last_for_client=True,
)
def test_end_to_end_missedmessage_hook(self) -> None:
"""Tests what arguments missedmessage_hook passes into maybe_enqueue_notifications.
Combined with the previous test, this ensures that the missedmessage_hook is correct"""
user_profile = self.example_user("hamlet")
user_profile.enable_online_push_notifications = False
user_profile.save()
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
iago = self.example_user("iago")
# Fetch the Denmark stream for testing
stream = get_stream("Denmark", user_profile.realm)
sub = Subscription.objects.get(
user_profile=user_profile,
recipient__type=Recipient.STREAM,
recipient__type_id=stream.id,
)
self.login_user(user_profile)
def change_subscription_properties(
user_profile: UserProfile,
stream: Stream,
sub: Subscription,
properties: Dict[str, bool],
) -> None:
for property_name, value in properties.items():
do_change_subscription_property(
user_profile, sub, stream, property_name, value, acting_user=None
)
def allocate_event_queue() -> ClientDescriptor:
result = self.tornado_call(
get_events,
user_profile,
{
"apply_markdown": orjson.dumps(True).decode(),
"client_gravatar": orjson.dumps(True).decode(),
"event_types": orjson.dumps(["message"]).decode(),
"user_client": "website",
"dont_block": orjson.dumps(True).decode(),
},
)
self.assert_json_success(result)
queue_id = orjson.loads(result.content)["queue_id"]
return get_client_descriptor(queue_id)
def destroy_event_queue(queue_id: str) -> None:
result = self.tornado_call(cleanup_event_queue, user_profile, {"queue_id": queue_id})
self.assert_json_success(result)
def assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict: Collection[Any],
message_id: int,
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
**kwargs: Any,
) -> None:
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
expected_args_dict = self.get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters(
user_id=user_profile.id,
sender_id=iago.id,
message_id=message_id,
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
**kwargs,
)
self.assertEqual(args_dict, expected_args_dict)
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
# To test the missed_message hook, we first need to send a message
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(iago, "Denmark")
# Verify that nothing happens if you call it as not the
# "last client descriptor", in which case the function
# short-circuits, since the `missedmessage_hook` handler
# for garbage-collection is only for the user's last queue.
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, False)
mock_enqueue.assert_not_called()
# Now verify that we called the appropriate enqueue function
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": False, "push_notified": False},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
# Test the hook with a private message; this should trigger notifications
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
msg_id = self.send_personal_message(iago, user_profile)
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
private_message=True,
already_notified={"email_notified": True, "push_notified": True},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
# Test the hook with a mention; this should trigger notifications
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(
self.example_user("iago"), "Denmark", content="@**King Hamlet** what's up?"
)
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
flags=["mentioned"],
mentioned=True,
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": True, "push_notified": True},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
# Test the hook with a wildcard mention; this should trigger notifications
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(iago, "Denmark", content="@**all** what's up?")
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
flags=["wildcard_mentioned"],
wildcard_mention_notify=True,
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": True, "push_notified": True},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
# Wildcard mentions in muted streams don't notify.
change_subscription_properties(user_profile, stream, sub, {"is_muted": True})
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(iago, "Denmark", content="@**all** what's up?")
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
flags=["wildcard_mentioned"],
message_id=msg_id,
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": False, "push_notified": False},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
change_subscription_properties(user_profile, stream, sub, {"is_muted": False})
# With wildcard_mentions_notify=False, we treat the user as not mentioned.
user_profile.wildcard_mentions_notify = False
user_profile.save()
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(iago, "Denmark", content="@**all** what's up?")
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
flags=["wildcard_mentioned"],
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": False, "push_notified": False},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
user_profile.wildcard_mentions_notify = True
user_profile.save()
# If wildcard_mentions_notify=True for a stream and False for a user, we treat the user
# as mentioned for that stream.
user_profile.wildcard_mentions_notify = False
sub.wildcard_mentions_notify = True
user_profile.save()
sub.save()
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(iago, "Denmark", content="@**all** what's up?")
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
flags=["wildcard_mentioned"],
wildcard_mention_notify=True,
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": True, "push_notified": True},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
user_profile.wildcard_mentions_notify = True
sub.wildcard_mentions_notify = None
user_profile.save()
sub.save()
# Test the hook with a stream message with stream_push_notify
change_subscription_properties(user_profile, stream, sub, {"push_notifications": True})
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(iago, "Denmark", content="what's up everyone?")
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
stream_push_notify=True,
stream_email_notify=False,
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": False, "push_notified": True},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
# Test the hook with a stream message with stream_email_notify
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
change_subscription_properties(
user_profile, stream, sub, {"push_notifications": False, "email_notifications": True}
)
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(iago, "Denmark", content="what's up everyone?")
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
stream_push_notify=False,
stream_email_notify=True,
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": True, "push_notified": False},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
# Test the hook with stream message with stream_push_notify on
# a muted topic, which we should not push notify for
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
change_subscription_properties(
user_profile, stream, sub, {"push_notifications": True, "email_notifications": False}
)
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
do_mute_topic(user_profile, stream, "mutingtest")
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
iago,
"Denmark",
content="what's up everyone?",
topic_name="mutingtest",
)
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": False, "push_notified": False},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
# Test the hook with stream message with stream_email_notify on
# a muted stream, which we should not push notify for
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
change_subscription_properties(
user_profile, stream, sub, {"push_notifications": False, "email_notifications": True}
)
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
change_subscription_properties(user_profile, stream, sub, {"is_muted": True})
2021-06-11 14:27:00 +02:00
msg_id = self.send_stream_message(iago, "Denmark", content="what's up everyone?")
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
stream_name="Denmark",
already_notified={"email_notified": False, "push_notified": False},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
# Clean up the state we just changed (not necessary unless we add more test code below)
change_subscription_properties(
user_profile, stream, sub, {"push_notifications": True, "is_muted": False}
)
# Test the hook when the sender has been muted
result = self.api_post(user_profile, f"/api/v1/users/me/muted_users/{iago.id}")
self.assert_json_success(result)
client_descriptor = allocate_event_queue()
self.assertTrue(client_descriptor.event_queue.empty())
msg_id = self.send_personal_message(iago, user_profile)
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.maybe_enqueue_notifications") as mock_enqueue:
missedmessage_hook(user_profile.id, client_descriptor, True)
maybe_enqueue_notifications: Take in notification_data dataclass. * Modify `maybe_enqueue_notifications` to take in an instance of the dataclass introduced in 951b49c048ba3464e74ad7965da3453fe36d0a96. * The `check_notify` tests tested the "when to notify" logic in a way which involved `maybe_enqueue_notifications`. To simplify things, we've earlier extracted this logic in 8182632d7e9f8490b9b9295e01b5912dcf173fd5. So, we just kill off the `check_notify` test, and keep only those parts which verify the queueing and return value behavior of that funtion. * We retain the the missedmessage_hook and message message_edit_notifications since they are more integration-style. * There's a slightly subtle change with the missedmessage_hook tests. Before this commit, we short-circuited the hook if the sender was muted (5a642cea115be159175d1189f83ba25d2c5c7632). With this commit, we delegate the check to our dataclass methods. So, `maybe_enqueue_notifications` will be called even if the sender was muted, and the test needs to be updated. * In our test helper `get_maybe_enqueue_notifications_parameters` which generates default values for testing `maybe_enqueue_notifications` calls, we keep `message_id`, `sender_id`, and `user_id` as required arguments, so that the tests are super-clear and avoid accidental false positives. * Because `do_update_embedded_data` also sends `update_message` events, we deal with that case with some hacky code for now. See the comment there. This mostly completes the extraction of the "when to notify" logic into our new `notification_data` module.
2021-06-23 14:12:32 +02:00
mock_enqueue.assert_called_once()
args_dict = mock_enqueue.call_args_list[0][1]
assert_maybe_enqueue_notifications_call_args(
args_dict=args_dict,
message_id=msg_id,
private_message=True,
sender_is_muted=True,
flags=["read"],
already_notified={"email_notified": False, "push_notified": False},
)
destroy_event_queue(client_descriptor.event_queue.id)
result = self.api_delete(user_profile, f"/api/v1/users/me/muted_users/{iago.id}")
self.assert_json_success(result)
class FileReloadLogicTest(ZulipTestCase):
def test_persistent_queue_filename(self) -> None:
with self.settings(
JSON_PERSISTENT_QUEUE_FILENAME_PATTERN="/home/zulip/tornado/event_queues%s.json"
):
self.assertEqual(
persistent_queue_filename(9800), "/home/zulip/tornado/event_queues.json"
)
self.assertEqual(
persistent_queue_filename(9800, last=True),
"/home/zulip/tornado/event_queues.json.last",
)
with self.settings(
JSON_PERSISTENT_QUEUE_FILENAME_PATTERN="/home/zulip/tornado/event_queues%s.json",
TORNADO_PROCESSES=4,
):
self.assertEqual(
persistent_queue_filename(9800), "/home/zulip/tornado/event_queues.9800.json"
)
self.assertEqual(
persistent_queue_filename(9800, last=True),
"/home/zulip/tornado/event_queues.9800.last.json",
)
class PruneInternalDataTest(ZulipTestCase):
def test_prune_internal_data(self) -> None:
user_profile = self.example_user("hamlet")
queue_data = dict(
all_public_streams=True,
apply_markdown=True,
client_gravatar=True,
client_type_name="website",
event_types=["message"],
last_connection_time=time.time(),
queue_timeout=600,
realm_id=user_profile.realm.id,
user_profile_id=user_profile.id,
)
client = allocate_client_descriptor(queue_data)
self.assertTrue(client.event_queue.empty())
self.send_stream_message(
self.example_user("iago"), "Denmark", content="@**King Hamlet** what's up?"
)
self.send_stream_message(
self.example_user("iago"), "Denmark", content="@**all** what's up?"
)
self.send_personal_message(self.example_user("iago"), user_profile)
events = client.event_queue.contents()
self.assert_length(events, 3)
self.assertFalse("internal_data" in events[0])
self.assertFalse("internal_data" in events[1])
self.assertFalse("internal_data" in events[2])
events = client.event_queue.contents(include_internal_data=True)
self.assertTrue("internal_data" in events[0])
self.assertTrue("internal_data" in events[1])
self.assertTrue("internal_data" in events[2])
class EventQueueTest(ZulipTestCase):
def get_client_descriptor(self) -> ClientDescriptor:
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
realm = hamlet.realm
queue_data = dict(
all_public_streams=False,
apply_markdown=False,
client_gravatar=True,
client_type_name="website",
event_types=None,
last_connection_time=time.time(),
queue_timeout=0,
realm_id=realm.id,
user_profile_id=hamlet.id,
)
client = allocate_client_descriptor(queue_data)
return client
def verify_to_dict_end_to_end(self, client: ClientDescriptor) -> None:
client_dict = client.to_dict()
new_client = ClientDescriptor.from_dict(client_dict)
self.assertEqual(client.to_dict(), new_client.to_dict())
client_dict = client.to_dict()
del client_dict["event_queue"]["newest_pruned_id"]
new_client = ClientDescriptor.from_dict(client_dict)
self.assertEqual(client_dict, new_client.to_dict())
def test_one_event(self) -> None:
client = self.get_client_descriptor()
queue = client.event_queue
2020-06-26 13:40:19 +02:00
in_dict = dict(
type="arbitrary",
x="foo",
y=42,
z=False,
timestamp="1",
)
out_dict = dict(
id=0,
**in_dict,
)
queue.push(in_dict)
self.assertFalse(queue.empty())
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
2020-06-26 13:40:19 +02:00
self.assertEqual(queue.contents(), [out_dict])
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
def test_event_collapsing(self) -> None:
client = self.get_client_descriptor()
queue = client.event_queue
"""
The update_message_flags events are special, because
they can be collapsed together. Given two umfe's, we:
* use the latest timestamp
* concatenate the messages
"""
def umfe(timestamp: int, messages: List[int]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
return dict(
type="update_message_flags",
operation="add",
flag="read",
all=False,
timestamp=timestamp,
messages=messages,
)
events = [
umfe(timestamp=1, messages=[101]),
umfe(timestamp=2, messages=[201, 202]),
dict(type="unknown"),
dict(type="restart", server_generation="1"),
umfe(timestamp=3, messages=[301, 302, 303]),
dict(type="restart", server_generation="2"),
umfe(timestamp=4, messages=[401, 402, 403, 404]),
]
for event in events:
queue.push(event)
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
self.assertEqual(
queue.contents(),
[
dict(id=2, type="unknown"),
dict(id=5, type="restart", server_generation="2"),
dict(
id=6,
type="update_message_flags",
operation="add",
flag="read",
all=False,
timestamp=4,
messages=[101, 201, 202, 301, 302, 303, 401, 402, 403, 404],
),
],
)
"""
Note that calling queue.contents() has the side
effect that we will no longer be able to collapse
the previous events, so the next event will just
get added to the queue, rather than collapsed.
"""
queue.push(
umfe(timestamp=5, messages=[501, 502, 503, 504, 505]),
)
self.assertEqual(
queue.contents(),
[
dict(id=2, type="unknown"),
dict(id=5, type="restart", server_generation="2"),
dict(
id=6,
type="update_message_flags",
operation="add",
flag="read",
all=False,
timestamp=4,
messages=[101, 201, 202, 301, 302, 303, 401, 402, 403, 404],
),
dict(
id=7,
type="update_message_flags",
operation="add",
flag="read",
all=False,
timestamp=5,
messages=[501, 502, 503, 504, 505],
),
],
)
def test_flag_add_collapsing(self) -> None:
client = self.get_client_descriptor()
queue = client.event_queue
queue.push(
{
"type": "update_message_flags",
"flag": "read",
"operation": "add",
"all": False,
"messages": [1, 2, 3, 4],
"timestamp": "1",
}
)
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
queue.push(
{
"type": "update_message_flags",
"flag": "read",
"all": False,
"operation": "add",
"messages": [5, 6],
"timestamp": "1",
}
)
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
self.assertEqual(
queue.contents(),
[
{
"id": 1,
"type": "update_message_flags",
"all": False,
"flag": "read",
"operation": "add",
"messages": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6],
"timestamp": "1",
}
],
)
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
def test_flag_remove_collapsing(self) -> None:
client = self.get_client_descriptor()
queue = client.event_queue
queue.push(
{
"type": "update_message_flags",
"flag": "collapsed",
"operation": "remove",
"all": False,
"messages": [1, 2, 3, 4],
"timestamp": "1",
}
)
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
queue.push(
{
"type": "update_message_flags",
"flag": "collapsed",
"all": False,
"operation": "remove",
"messages": [5, 6],
"timestamp": "1",
}
)
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
self.assertEqual(
queue.contents(),
[
{
"id": 1,
"type": "update_message_flags",
"all": False,
"flag": "collapsed",
"operation": "remove",
"messages": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6],
"timestamp": "1",
}
],
)
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
def test_collapse_event(self) -> None:
"""
This mostly focues on the internals of
how we store "virtual_events" that we
can collapse if subsequent events are
of the same form. See the code in
EventQueue.push for more context.
"""
client = self.get_client_descriptor()
queue = client.event_queue
queue.push({"type": "restart", "server_generation": 1, "timestamp": "1"})
# Verify the server_generation event is stored as a virtual event
self.assertEqual(
queue.virtual_events,
{"restart": {"id": 0, "type": "restart", "server_generation": 1, "timestamp": "1"}},
)
# And we can reconstruct newest_pruned_id etc.
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
queue.push({"type": "unknown", "timestamp": "1"})
self.assertEqual(list(queue.queue), [{"id": 1, "type": "unknown", "timestamp": "1"}])
self.assertEqual(
queue.virtual_events,
{"restart": {"id": 0, "type": "restart", "server_generation": 1, "timestamp": "1"}},
)
# And we can still reconstruct newest_pruned_id etc. correctly
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
# Verify virtual events are converted to real events by .contents()
self.assertEqual(
queue.contents(),
[
{"id": 0, "type": "restart", "server_generation": 1, "timestamp": "1"},
{"id": 1, "type": "unknown", "timestamp": "1"},
],
)
# And now verify to_dict after pruning
queue.prune(0)
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
queue.prune(1)
self.verify_to_dict_end_to_end(client)
class SchemaMigrationsTests(ZulipTestCase):
def test_reformat_legacy_send_message_event(self) -> None:
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
othello = self.example_user("othello")
old_format_event = dict(
type="message",
message=1,
message_dict={},
presence_idle_user_ids=[hamlet.id, othello.id],
)
old_format_users = [
dict(
id=hamlet.id,
flags=["mentioned"],
mentioned=True,
online_push_enabled=True,
stream_push_notify=False,
stream_email_notify=True,
wildcard_mention_notify=False,
sender_is_muted=False,
),
dict(
id=cordelia.id,
flags=["wildcard_mentioned"],
mentioned=False,
online_push_enabled=True,
stream_push_notify=True,
stream_email_notify=False,
wildcard_mention_notify=True,
sender_is_muted=False,
),
]
notice = dict(event=old_format_event, users=old_format_users)
expected_current_format_users = [
dict(
id=hamlet.id,
flags=["mentioned"],
),
dict(
id=cordelia.id,
flags=["wildcard_mentioned"],
),
]
expected_current_format_event = dict(
type="message",
message=1,
message_dict={},
presence_idle_user_ids=[hamlet.id, othello.id],
online_push_user_ids=[hamlet.id, cordelia.id],
stream_push_user_ids=[cordelia.id],
stream_email_user_ids=[hamlet.id],
wildcard_mention_user_ids=[cordelia.id],
muted_sender_user_ids=[],
)
with mock.patch("zerver.tornado.event_queue.process_message_event") as m:
process_notification(notice)
m.assert_called_once()
self.assertDictEqual(m.call_args[0][0], expected_current_format_event)
self.assertEqual(m.call_args[0][1], expected_current_format_users)