mirror of https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
200 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
200 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
|
## Asciidoctor: An active open-source community building software to share knowledge
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Started in 2012, the [Asciidoctor](https://asciidoctor.org) community develops
|
|||
|
an [open-source](https://github.com/asciidoctor) text processor for parsing
|
|||
|
AsciiDoc content, enriching it, and converting it to formats such as HTML 5,
|
|||
|
DocBook, PDF, and many others.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For years, the project struggled to find a way to bring the community together
|
|||
|
in one place. Thanks to recommendations from leaders at other open-source
|
|||
|
communities, the Asciidoctor project leads decided to give Zulip a try to see if
|
|||
|
it could solve those challenges. “Moving to Zulip transformed our dialogue,
|
|||
|
making it organized, inclusive, and thoughtful in a way it never was before,”
|
|||
|
says project lead [Dan Allen](https://github.com/mojavelinux). “We finally had a
|
|||
|
home base. Zulip has been a game changer for our community.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> “Zulip has been a game changer for our community.”
|
|||
|
>
|
|||
|
> — Project lead Dan Allen
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## A decade-long search for a communication platform to bring the community together
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
“In the early days, we started out only communicating using the GitHub issue
|
|||
|
tracker,” Dan Allen recalls, “but we could see that it wasn’t going to scale. It
|
|||
|
doesn’t provide a channel for general dialogue.” The project tried IRC, but it
|
|||
|
was unapproachable for newcomers and lacked modern chat and moderation features.
|
|||
|
Asciidoctor set up a discussion list, but that wasn’t a good fit either.
|
|||
|
Contacting hundreds of people over email to ask a simple question always felt
|
|||
|
inappropriate, and the lack of real-time interaction ended up making
|
|||
|
conversations take longer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Looking for a web-based chat solution, Asciidoctor tapped into Gitter in 2014.
|
|||
|
“Gitter certainly looks modern and approachable. However, we quickly learned
|
|||
|
that the single, running thread of the channel was both chaotic and stressful,”
|
|||
|
Dan says. And the platform had mostly stagnated.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Many users in the community pleaded for threads, but Gitter’s threading feature
|
|||
|
(finally added in 2020), only made the situation more problematic for the
|
|||
|
community. “Threads buried the replies. You had to either navigate to threads
|
|||
|
using notifications, or scroll back multiple pages to find the little ‘see
|
|||
|
replies’ link and rediscover the thread. It was just so tedious,” Dan recalls.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> “The conversations in Gitter were becoming more about Gitter and its
|
|||
|
> limitations and less about the project itself.”
|
|||
|
>
|
|||
|
> — Project lead Dan Allen
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
While Gitter allows users to create new rooms, what the project really needed
|
|||
|
was a single community space with “socially distanced” conversations going on.
|
|||
|
They needed a new model. And that’s exactly what they found in Zulip.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## Asciidoctor moves to Zulip: “All the anxiety and stress was gone”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With the community continuing to grow, Dan and fellow maintainers decided it was
|
|||
|
time to seek out a better solution. Drawing on advice from leaders of other
|
|||
|
open-source communities, the project decided to give Zulip a try in early 2021.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
[Zulip’s streams and topics model](/why-zulip/) immediately clicked. “Streams
|
|||
|
partition the community without making it feel divided. When someone has a
|
|||
|
question, they can find the most relevant stream and either make a new topic or
|
|||
|
contribute to an existing one.” This paradigm was a game-changer. “Literally the
|
|||
|
day we moved to Zulip, all the anxiety and stress of keeping up with the
|
|||
|
discourse was gone,” Dan says.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With Zulip, Dan has developed a comfortable workflow for catching up on
|
|||
|
conversations after being away. “When I start my day, I open up the [Recent
|
|||
|
topics](/help/recent-topics) page and work through the topics that have activity
|
|||
|
on-by-one,” Dan describes. More casual community participants can [skim the
|
|||
|
topic list](/help/reading-strategies) to find interesting discussions, and mark
|
|||
|
topics they don’t care about as read with a single click.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## Powerful moderation tools help keep conversations on track
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Zulip’s topic model helps discussions stay focused. “Zulip starts the
|
|||
|
conversation out on the right foot by giving it its own space as a topic,” Dan
|
|||
|
explains. “As a result, conversations don’t have to be branched from an
|
|||
|
arbitrary spot, and the discussion is much more likely to stay focused and
|
|||
|
succinct.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> “Zulip starts the conversation out on the right foot by giving it its own
|
|||
|
> space as a topic.”
|
|||
|
>
|
|||
|
> — Project lead Dan Allen
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If a topic starts in the wrong place or veers off course, Zulip’s [moderation
|
|||
|
tools](/help/moderating-open-organizations) make it easy to fix. Community
|
|||
|
moderators can keep the dialogue organized by reclassifying topics and posts
|
|||
|
without disrupting the ongoing conversation. “If someone accidentally posts to
|
|||
|
the wrong stream or topic, Zulip allows me to [move those messages
|
|||
|
around](/help/move-content-to-another-stream) so they land in the right spot,”
|
|||
|
Dan says. “Moving messages also sends a subtle hint to the person posting about
|
|||
|
where to post the next time. And I can use [topic
|
|||
|
references](/help/link-to-a-message-or-conversation#link-to-a-stream-or-topic-within-zulip)
|
|||
|
to link to the new topic location, or to a related topic. That’s incredibly
|
|||
|
powerful,” Dan says.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The ability to [mark topics as resolved](/help/resolve-a-topic) helps moderators
|
|||
|
see at a glance which topics require their attention. “Many topics reach a
|
|||
|
logical conclusion when the initial question has been answered, and the initial
|
|||
|
poster will typically express that they’re satisfied. At that point, one of us
|
|||
|
marks the topic as resolved,” Dan explains. “When I’m looking for topics that
|
|||
|
need my attention, I can focus on the ones that aren’t yet resolved and try to
|
|||
|
help get them to that state.” Later on, community members can use resolved
|
|||
|
topics [as a reference source](#zulip-makes-information-easy-to-find).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## Zulip enables organized, inclusive and thoughtful discussion
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
After a successful launch of the Asciidoctor community on Zulip, Asciidoctor’s
|
|||
|
sibling project [Antora](https://antora.org) adopted it as well. For both
|
|||
|
projects, using Zulip has been night and day compared to other platforms. “I can
|
|||
|
manage hundreds of participants across two communities extremely efficiently,
|
|||
|
and I don’t feel stressed,” says Dan. “I used it for my company chat as well.
|
|||
|
Zulip is calm and organized. I can immediately see what people are asking
|
|||
|
and jump to respond when I need to.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> “I can manage hundreds of participants across two communities extremely
|
|||
|
> efficiently.”
|
|||
|
>
|
|||
|
> — Project lead Dan Allen
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The sense of space created by Zulip’s topic model has made the community more
|
|||
|
inclusive. “Using Zulip gives space to a much broader range of voices.
|
|||
|
We’re seeing people participating who never participated before,” Dan says.
|
|||
|
“People who are less extroverted, who don’t speak English natively, or just
|
|||
|
can’t type as quickly now all have a chance to be part of the dialogue. Zulip
|
|||
|
offers a more manageable pace.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> “We’re seeing people participating who never participated before.”
|
|||
|
>
|
|||
|
> — Project lead Dan Allen
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Even the tone of conversation has shifted, becoming more respectful and
|
|||
|
thoughtful. “People are more relaxed. They can think and take their time to
|
|||
|
reply. Topics give people space. People don’t feel like they are trying to talk
|
|||
|
over someone else. That means you can have more constructive dialogue because
|
|||
|
the volume level is lower,” says Dan. At the same time, Zulip enables
|
|||
|
lightweight interactions. “Often times, I participate just [using
|
|||
|
emoji](/help/emoji-reactions). I must use the 👍 and 🎉 reactions dozens of
|
|||
|
times a day,” Dan says.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Streams have also helped the community get to know one another better. “When we
|
|||
|
created the instance, we set up a #social stream. We seeded it with the topic
|
|||
|
‘introduce yourself’, and new members took full advantage of it,” Dan says. The
|
|||
|
social stream has brought a more personal touch to the community. “In real life,
|
|||
|
no one just walks in and starts asking questions out of the blue,” Dan points
|
|||
|
out. “In the social stream, we’ve talked about non-technical topics like TV
|
|||
|
series, screen setups, and holiday wishes just to get to know the people behind
|
|||
|
the screen name and enrich each other’s lives in other ways. What we learned?
|
|||
|
Everyone enjoys a lot of British TV. ;)”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## Zulip makes information easy to find
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As a community grows, its conversation history becomes a trove of reference
|
|||
|
information. However, this history provides value only if the information is
|
|||
|
findable. “Once a conversation went out of view in Gitter, it was essentially
|
|||
|
lost,” Dan says. “The search was global across the whole Gitter instance, and it
|
|||
|
only returned excerpts with no sense of context. It was often faster to just
|
|||
|
scroll through the history in an attempt to try to find where the conversation
|
|||
|
happened than it was to search.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In contrast, Zulip offers a [faceted search](/help/search-for-messages) that
|
|||
|
lets you find past discussions with pinpoint accuracy. “You can narrow the
|
|||
|
search to a stream or topic (with autocomplete!),” Dan points out. The results
|
|||
|
are presented with topic headings, making it easier to see whether the message
|
|||
|
is relevant. “You can click the topic to see the message in context,” Dan says.
|
|||
|
“It’s not only a great way to search, but it’s a great way to catch up on
|
|||
|
messages too. You can also search for all messages you sent, which turns out to
|
|||
|
be a great navigation tool and a memory saver!”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## “Zulip is the heart of our community”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Dan is passionate about supporting Zulip’s development. “If we don’t sponsor the
|
|||
|
open source projects we love, we’ll have no one else to blame if we live in a
|
|||
|
world of proprietary software,” Dan says. “We truly feel heard by Zulip
|
|||
|
developers when we provide feedback. We also love that Zulip is [truly open
|
|||
|
source](https://blog.zulip.com/2021/04/28/why-zulip-is-on-github-sponsors/), not
|
|||
|
open core like some alternatives. And we very much appreciate Zulip supporting
|
|||
|
open source by hosting our Zulip instances.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
“Zulip is the heart of our community, and nearly everyone who participates
|
|||
|
absolutely loves it,” Dan says. “It really does provide [everything we
|
|||
|
need](/features) to manage the discourse, including topic-based threads,
|
|||
|
mentions, faceted search, moderation controls, polls, and emoji.” Speaking on
|
|||
|
behalf of the Asciidoctor and Antora projects, Dan wholeheartedly recommends
|
|||
|
that other communities give it a try. “Many communities have been strained to
|
|||
|
the limits during the pandemic,” says Dan. “Zulip brings health back to these
|
|||
|
communities.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Check out our guide on using Zulip for [open source](/for/open-source), and
|
|||
|
learn how Zulip [helps communities scale](/for/communities)!
|