zulip/tools/travis/frontend

#!/bin/bash

source tools/travis/activate-venv

set -e
set -x

./tools/lint --frontend
./tools/test-js-with-node --coverage
./tools/test-js-with-casper

# NB: Everything here should be in `tools/test-all`.  If there's a
# reason not to run it there, it should be there as a comment
# explaining why.
Expand testing done via Travis CI to cover production pipeline. With this change, we are now testing the production static asset pipeline and installation process in a new testing job (and also run the frontend/backend tests separately). This means that changes that break the Zulip static asset pipeline or production installation process are more likely to fail tests. The testing is imperfect in that it does not have proper isolation -- we build a complete Zulip development environment and then install a Zulip production environment on top of it, so e.g. any apt dependencies installed for Zulip development will still be available for the Zulip production environment. But, it's better than nothing! A good v2 of this would be to have the production setup process just install the minimum stuff needed to run `build-release-tarball` and then uninstall it / clean it up so that we can do a more clear production installation, but that's more work. 2015-10-15 01:47:42 +02:00			`#!/bin/bash`
Use tools/travis/activate-venv in test suites. 2016-07-18 23:22:10 +02:00
			`source tools/travis/activate-venv`

Expand testing done via Travis CI to cover production pipeline. With this change, we are now testing the production static asset pipeline and installation process in a new testing job (and also run the frontend/backend tests separately). This means that changes that break the Zulip static asset pipeline or production installation process are more likely to fail tests. The testing is imperfect in that it does not have proper isolation -- we build a complete Zulip development environment and then install a Zulip production environment on top of it, so e.g. any apt dependencies installed for Zulip development will still be available for the Zulip production environment. But, it's better than nothing! A good v2 of this would be to have the production setup process just install the minimum stuff needed to run `build-release-tarball` and then uninstall it / clean it up so that we can do a more clear production installation, but that's more work. 2015-10-15 01:47:42 +02:00			`set -e`
			`set -x`
Use tools/travis/activate-venv in test suites. 2016-07-18 23:22:10 +02:00
travis: Distribute linting over frontend and backend suites. 2017-08-25 15:25:51 +02:00			`./tools/lint --frontend`
node tests: Add support for enforcing 100% test coverage. Fixes #5178. 2017-06-07 04:24:39 +02:00			`./tools/test-js-with-node --coverage`
Expand testing done via Travis CI to cover production pipeline. With this change, we are now testing the production static asset pipeline and installation process in a new testing job (and also run the frontend/backend tests separately). This means that changes that break the Zulip static asset pipeline or production installation process are more likely to fail tests. The testing is imperfect in that it does not have proper isolation -- we build a complete Zulip development environment and then install a Zulip production environment on top of it, so e.g. any apt dependencies installed for Zulip development will still be available for the Zulip production environment. But, it's better than nothing! A good v2 of this would be to have the production setup process just install the minimum stuff needed to run `build-release-tarball` and then uninstall it / clean it up so that we can do a more clear production installation, but that's more work. 2015-10-15 01:47:42 +02:00			`./tools/test-js-with-casper`
tests: Bring all the top-level test scripts into alignment on what to test. Notably, this adds our checks on translated message strings to `tools/test-all`, so that they don't cause surprise failures in CI after a branch is pushed. (Alternately they could have gone in `tools/lint` to accomplish the same goal, but `makemessages` which they depend on is quite slow -- on my machine it takes 7s, compared to 10s for all of `tools/lint`.) 2017-07-25 04:46:15 +02:00
			# NB: Everything here should be in `tools/test-all`. If there's a
			`# reason not to run it there, it should be there as a comment`
			`# explaining why.`