2021-07-06 16:27:04 +02:00
|
|
|
import datetime
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
from typing import Any, List, Mapping
|
2021-07-06 16:27:04 +02:00
|
|
|
from unittest import mock
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import orjson
|
2021-07-06 16:27:04 +02:00
|
|
|
from django.utils.timezone import now as timezone_now
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.actions import do_change_can_create_users, do_change_user_role
|
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.exceptions import JsonableError
|
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.streams import access_stream_for_send_message
|
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.test_classes import ZulipTestCase
|
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.test_helpers import most_recent_message, queries_captured
|
|
|
|
from zerver.lib.users import is_administrator_role
|
|
|
|
from zerver.models import (
|
|
|
|
UserProfile,
|
|
|
|
UserStatus,
|
|
|
|
get_display_recipient,
|
|
|
|
get_realm,
|
|
|
|
get_stream,
|
|
|
|
get_user_by_delivery_email,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Most Zulip tests use ZulipTestCase, which inherits from django.test.TestCase.
|
|
|
|
# We recommend learning Django basics first, so search the web for "django testing".
|
|
|
|
# A common first result is https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/topics/testing/
|
|
|
|
class TestBasics(ZulipTestCase):
|
|
|
|
def test_basics(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
# Django's tests are based on Python's unittest module, so you
|
|
|
|
# will see us use things like assertEqual, assertTrue, and assertRaisesRegex
|
|
|
|
# quite often.
|
|
|
|
# See https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#unittest.TestCase.assertEqual
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(7 * 6, 42)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestBasicUserStuff(ZulipTestCase):
|
|
|
|
# Zulip has test fixtures with built-in users. It's good to know
|
|
|
|
# which users are special. For example, Iago is our built-in
|
|
|
|
# realm administrator. You can also modify users as needed.
|
|
|
|
def test_users(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
# The example_user() helper returns a UserProfile object.
|
|
|
|
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(hamlet.full_name, "King Hamlet")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(hamlet.role, UserProfile.ROLE_MEMBER)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iago = self.example_user("iago")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(iago.role, UserProfile.ROLE_REALM_ADMINISTRATOR)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
polonius = self.example_user("polonius")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(polonius.role, UserProfile.ROLE_GUEST)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(self.example_email("cordelia"), "cordelia@zulip.com")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_lib_functions(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
# This test is an example of testing a single library function.
|
|
|
|
# Our tests aren't always at this level of granularity, but it's
|
|
|
|
# often possible to write concise tests for library functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Get our UserProfile objects first.
|
|
|
|
iago = self.example_user("iago")
|
|
|
|
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# It is a good idea for your tests to clearly demonstrate a
|
|
|
|
# **change** to a value. So here we want to make sure that
|
|
|
|
# do_change_user_role will change Hamlet such that
|
|
|
|
# is_administrator_role becomes True, but we first assert it's
|
|
|
|
# False.
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(is_administrator_role(hamlet.role))
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# Tests should modify properties using the standard library
|
|
|
|
# functions, like do_change_user_role. Modifying Django
|
|
|
|
# objects and then using .save() can be buggy, as doing so can
|
|
|
|
# fail to update caches, RealmAuditLog, or related tables properly.
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
do_change_user_role(hamlet, UserProfile.ROLE_REALM_OWNER, acting_user=iago)
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(is_administrator_role(hamlet.role))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# After we promote Hamlet, we also demote him. Testing state
|
|
|
|
# changes like this in a single test can be a good technique,
|
|
|
|
# although we also don't want tests to be too long.
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Important note: You don't need to undo changes done in the
|
|
|
|
# test at the end. Every test is run inside a database
|
|
|
|
# transaction, that is reverted after the test completes.
|
|
|
|
# There are a few exceptions, where tests interact with the
|
|
|
|
# filesystem (E.g. uploading files), which is generally
|
|
|
|
# handled by the setUp/tearDown methods for the test class.
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
do_change_user_role(hamlet, UserProfile.ROLE_MODERATOR, acting_user=iago)
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(is_administrator_role(hamlet.role))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestFullStack(ZulipTestCase):
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# Zulip's backend tests are largely full-stack integration tests,
|
|
|
|
# making use of some strategic mocking at times, though we do use
|
|
|
|
# unit tests for some classes of low-level functions.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# See https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/testing/philosophy.html
|
|
|
|
# for details on this and other testing design decisions.
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_client_get(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
|
|
|
|
cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Most full-stack tests require you to log in the user.
|
|
|
|
# The login_user helper basically wraps Django's client.login().
|
|
|
|
self.login_user(hamlet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Zulip's client_get is a very thin wrapper on Django's client.get.
|
|
|
|
# We always use the Zulip wrappers for client_get and client_post.
|
|
|
|
url = f"/json/users/{cordelia.id}"
|
|
|
|
result = self.client_get(url)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Almost every meaningful full-stack test for a "happy path" situation
|
|
|
|
# uses assert_json_success().
|
|
|
|
self.assert_json_success(result)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# When we unpack the result.content object, we prefer the orjson library.
|
|
|
|
content = orjson.loads(result.content)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# In this case we will validate the entire payload. It's good to use
|
|
|
|
# concrete values where possible, but some things, like "cordelia.id",
|
|
|
|
# are somewhat unpredictable, so we don't hard code values.
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Others, like email and full_name here, are fields we haven't
|
|
|
|
# changed, and thus explicit values would just be hardcoding
|
|
|
|
# test database defaults in additional places.
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
content["user"],
|
|
|
|
dict(
|
|
|
|
avatar_url=content["user"]["avatar_url"],
|
|
|
|
avatar_version=1,
|
|
|
|
date_joined=content["user"]["date_joined"],
|
|
|
|
email=cordelia.email,
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
full_name=cordelia.full_name,
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
is_active=True,
|
|
|
|
is_admin=False,
|
|
|
|
is_billing_admin=False,
|
|
|
|
is_bot=False,
|
|
|
|
is_guest=False,
|
|
|
|
is_owner=False,
|
|
|
|
role=UserProfile.ROLE_MEMBER,
|
|
|
|
timezone="",
|
|
|
|
user_id=cordelia.id,
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_client_post(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
# Here we're gonna test a POST call to /json/users, and it's
|
|
|
|
# important that we not only check the payload, but we make
|
|
|
|
# sure that the intended side effects actually happen.
|
|
|
|
iago = self.example_user("iago")
|
|
|
|
self.login_user(iago)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realm = get_realm("zulip")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(realm.id, iago.realm_id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Get our failing test first.
|
|
|
|
self.assertRaises(
|
|
|
|
UserProfile.DoesNotExist, lambda: get_user_by_delivery_email("romeo@zulip.net", realm)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Before we can successfully post, we need to ensure
|
|
|
|
# that Iago can create users.
|
|
|
|
do_change_can_create_users(iago, True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
params = dict(
|
|
|
|
email="romeo@zulip.net",
|
|
|
|
password="xxxx",
|
|
|
|
full_name="Romeo Montague",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Use the Zulip wrapper.
|
|
|
|
result = self.client_post("/json/users", params)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Once again we check that the HTTP request was successful.
|
|
|
|
self.assert_json_success(result)
|
|
|
|
content = orjson.loads(result.content)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Finally we test the side effect of the post.
|
|
|
|
user_id = content["user_id"]
|
|
|
|
romeo = get_user_by_delivery_email("romeo@zulip.net", realm)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(romeo.id, user_id)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_can_create_users(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
# Typically, when testing an API endpoint, we prefer a single
|
|
|
|
# test covering both the happy path and common error paths.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# See https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/testing/philosophy.html#share-test-setup-code.
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
iago = self.example_user("iago")
|
|
|
|
self.login_user(iago)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do_change_can_create_users(iago, False)
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
valid_params = dict(
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
email="romeo@zulip.net",
|
|
|
|
password="xxxx",
|
|
|
|
full_name="Romeo Montague",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# We often use assert_json_error for negative tests.
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
result = self.client_post("/json/users", valid_params)
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assert_json_error(result, "User not authorized for this query", 400)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do_change_can_create_users(iago, True)
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
incomplete_params = dict(
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
full_name="Romeo Montague",
|
|
|
|
)
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
result = self.client_post("/json/users", incomplete_params)
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assert_json_error(result, "Missing 'email' argument", 400)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# Verify that the original parameters were valid. Especially
|
|
|
|
# for errors with generic error messages, this is important to
|
|
|
|
# confirm that the original request with these parameters
|
|
|
|
# failed because of incorrect permissions, and not because
|
|
|
|
# valid_params weren't actually valid.
|
|
|
|
result = self.client_post("/json/users", valid_params)
|
|
|
|
self.assert_json_success(result)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify error handling when the user already exists.
|
|
|
|
result = self.client_post("/json/users", valid_params)
|
|
|
|
self.assert_json_error(result, "Email 'romeo@zulip.net' already in use", 400)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
def test_tornado_redirects(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
# Let's poke a bit at Zulip's event system.
|
|
|
|
# See https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/subsystems/events-system.html
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# for context on the system itself and how it should be tested.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Most specific features that might feel tricky to test have
|
|
|
|
# similarly handy helpers, so find similar tests with `git grep` and read them!
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
|
|
|
|
self.login_user(cordelia)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
params = dict(status_text="on vacation")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
events: List[Mapping[str, Any]] = []
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Use the tornado_redirected_to_list context manager to capture
|
|
|
|
# events.
|
|
|
|
with self.tornado_redirected_to_list(events, expected_num_events=1):
|
|
|
|
result = self.api_post(cordelia, "/api/v1/users/me/status", params)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.assert_json_success(result)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# Check that the POST to Zulip caused the expected events to be sent
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
# to Tornado.
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
events[0]["event"],
|
|
|
|
dict(type="user_status", user_id=cordelia.id, status_text="on vacation"),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# Grabbing the last row in the table is OK here, but often it's
|
|
|
|
# better to look up the object we created via its ID,
|
|
|
|
# especially if there's risk of similar objects existing
|
|
|
|
# (E.g. a message sent to that topic earlier in the test).
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
row = UserStatus.objects.last()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(row.user_profile_id, cordelia.id)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(row.status_text, "on vacation")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestStreamHelpers(ZulipTestCase):
|
|
|
|
# Streams are an important concept in Zulip, and ZulipTestCase
|
|
|
|
# has helpers such as subscribe, users_subscribed_to_stream,
|
|
|
|
# and make_stream.
|
|
|
|
def test_new_streams(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
|
|
|
|
othello = self.example_user("othello")
|
|
|
|
realm = cordelia.realm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stream_name = "Some new stream"
|
|
|
|
self.subscribe(cordelia, stream_name)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(set(self.users_subscribed_to_stream(stream_name, realm)), {cordelia})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.subscribe(othello, stream_name)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
set(self.users_subscribed_to_stream(stream_name, realm)), {cordelia, othello}
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_private_stream(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
# When we test stream permissions, it's very common to use at least
|
|
|
|
# two users, so that you can see how different users are impacted.
|
|
|
|
# We commonly use Othello to represent the "other" user from the primary user.
|
|
|
|
cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
|
|
|
|
othello = self.example_user("othello")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
realm = cordelia.realm
|
|
|
|
stream_name = "Some private stream"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Use the invite_only flag in make_stream to make a stream "private".
|
|
|
|
stream = self.make_stream(stream_name=stream_name, invite_only=True)
|
|
|
|
self.subscribe(cordelia, stream_name)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(set(self.users_subscribed_to_stream(stream_name, realm)), {cordelia})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stream = get_stream(stream_name, realm)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(stream.name, stream_name)
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(stream.invite_only)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# We will now observe that Cordelia can access the stream...
|
|
|
|
access_stream_for_send_message(cordelia, stream, forwarder_user_profile=None)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ...but Othello can't.
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
with self.assertRaisesRegex(JsonableError, "Not authorized to send to stream"):
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
access_stream_for_send_message(othello, stream, forwarder_user_profile=None)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestMessageHelpers(ZulipTestCase):
|
|
|
|
# If you are testing behavior related to messages, then it's good
|
|
|
|
# to know about send_stream_message, send_personal_message, and
|
|
|
|
# most_recent_message.
|
|
|
|
def test_stream_message(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
|
|
|
|
iago = self.example_user("iago")
|
|
|
|
self.subscribe(hamlet, "Denmark")
|
|
|
|
self.subscribe(iago, "Denmark")
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# The functions to send a message return the ID of the created
|
|
|
|
# message, so you usually you don't need to look it up.
|
|
|
|
sent_message_id = self.send_stream_message(
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
sender=hamlet,
|
|
|
|
stream_name="Denmark",
|
|
|
|
topic_name="lunch",
|
|
|
|
content="I want pizza!",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# But if you want to verify the most recent message received
|
|
|
|
# by a user, there's a handy function for that.
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
iago_message = most_recent_message(iago)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# Here we check that the message we sent is the last one that
|
|
|
|
# Iago received. While we verify several properties of the
|
|
|
|
# last message, the most important to verify is the unique ID,
|
|
|
|
# since that protects us from bugs if this test were to be
|
|
|
|
# extended to send multiple similar messages.
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(iago_message.id, sent_message_id)
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(iago_message.sender_id, hamlet.id)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(get_display_recipient(iago_message.recipient), "Denmark")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(iago_message.topic_name(), "lunch")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(iago_message.content, "I want pizza!")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_personal_message(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
|
|
|
|
cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
sent_message_id = self.send_personal_message(
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
from_user=hamlet,
|
|
|
|
to_user=cordelia,
|
|
|
|
content="hello there!",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cordelia_message = most_recent_message(cordelia)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(cordelia_message.id, sent_message_id)
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(cordelia_message.sender_id, hamlet.id)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(cordelia_message.content, "hello there!")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestQueryCounts(ZulipTestCase):
|
|
|
|
def test_capturing_queries(self) -> None:
|
2021-06-08 01:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
# It's a common pitfall in Django to accidentally perform
|
|
|
|
# database queries in a loop, due to lazy evaluation of
|
|
|
|
# foreign keys. We use the queries_captured context manager to
|
|
|
|
# ensure our query count is predictable.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# When a test containing one of these query count assertions
|
|
|
|
# fails, we'll want to understand the new queries and whether
|
|
|
|
# they're necessary. You can investiate whether the changes
|
|
|
|
# are expected/sensible by comparing print(queries) between
|
|
|
|
# your branch and master.
|
2021-05-26 16:37:03 +02:00
|
|
|
hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
|
|
|
|
cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with queries_captured() as queries:
|
|
|
|
self.send_personal_message(
|
|
|
|
from_user=hamlet,
|
|
|
|
to_user=cordelia,
|
|
|
|
content="hello there!",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The assert_length helper is another useful extra from ZulipTestCase.
|
|
|
|
self.assert_length(queries, 16)
|
2021-06-19 21:31:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestDevelopmentEmailsLog(ZulipTestCase):
|
|
|
|
# We have development specific utilities that automate common tasks
|
|
|
|
# to improve developer productivity.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Ones such is /emails/generate/ endpoint that can be used to generate
|
|
|
|
# all sorts of emails zulip sends. Those can be accessed at /emails/
|
|
|
|
# in development server. Let's test that here.
|
|
|
|
def test_generate_emails(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
# It is a common case where some functions that we test rely
|
|
|
|
# on a certain setting's value. You can test those under the
|
|
|
|
# context of a desired setting value as done below.
|
|
|
|
# The endpoint we're testing here rely on these settings:
|
|
|
|
# * EMAIL_BACKEND: The backend class used to send emails.
|
|
|
|
# * DEVELOPMENT_LOG_EMAILS: Whether to log emails sent.
|
|
|
|
# so, we set those to required values.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# If the code you're testing creates logs, it is best to capture them
|
|
|
|
# and verify the log messages. That can be achieved with assertLogs()
|
|
|
|
# as you'll see below. Read more about assertLogs() at:
|
|
|
|
# https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#unittest.TestCase.assertLogs
|
|
|
|
with self.settings(EMAIL_BACKEND="zproject.email_backends.EmailLogBackEnd"), self.settings(
|
|
|
|
DEVELOPMENT_LOG_EMAILS=True
|
|
|
|
), self.assertLogs(level="INFO") as logger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
result = self.client_get(
|
|
|
|
"/emails/generate/"
|
|
|
|
) # Generates emails and redirects to /emails/
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual("/emails/", result["Location"]) # Make sure redirect URL is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The above call to /emails/generate/ creates 15 emails and
|
|
|
|
# logs the below line for every email.
|
|
|
|
output_log = (
|
|
|
|
"INFO:root:Emails sent in development are available at http://testserver/emails"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# logger.output is a list of all the log messages captured. Verify it is as expected.
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(logger.output, [output_log] * 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now, lets actually go the URL the above call redirects to, i.e., /emails/
|
|
|
|
result = self.client_get(result["Location"])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# assert_in_success_response() is another helper that is commonly used to ensure
|
|
|
|
# we are on the right page by verifying a string exists in the page's content.
|
|
|
|
self.assert_in_success_response(["All the emails sent in the Zulip"], result)
|
2021-07-06 16:27:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestMocking(ZulipTestCase):
|
|
|
|
# Mocking, primarily used in testing, is a technique that allows you to
|
|
|
|
# replace methods or objects with fake entities.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Mocking is generally used in situations where
|
|
|
|
# we want to avoid running original code for reasons
|
|
|
|
# like skipping HTTP requests, saving execution time etc.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Learn more about mocking in-depth at:
|
|
|
|
# https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/testing/testing-with-django.html#testing-with-mocks
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# The following test demonstrates a simple use case
|
|
|
|
# where mocking is helpful in saving test-run time.
|
|
|
|
def test_edit_message(self) -> None:
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Verify if the time limit imposed on message editing is working correctly.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
iago = self.example_user("iago")
|
|
|
|
self.login("iago")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Set limit to edit message content.
|
|
|
|
MESSAGE_CONTENT_EDIT_LIMIT = 5 * 60 # 5 minutes
|
|
|
|
result = self.client_patch(
|
|
|
|
"/json/realm",
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"allow_message_editing": "true",
|
|
|
|
"message_content_edit_limit_seconds": MESSAGE_CONTENT_EDIT_LIMIT,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assert_json_success(result)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sent_message_id = self.send_stream_message(
|
|
|
|
iago,
|
|
|
|
"Scotland",
|
|
|
|
topic_name="lunch",
|
|
|
|
content="I want pizza!",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
message_sent_time = timezone_now()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify message sent.
|
|
|
|
message = most_recent_message(iago)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(message.id, sent_message_id)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(message.content, "I want pizza!")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Edit message content now. This should work as we're editing
|
|
|
|
# it immediately after sending i.e., before the limit exceeds.
|
|
|
|
result = self.client_patch(
|
|
|
|
f"/json/messages/{sent_message_id}", {"content": "I want burger!"}
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assert_json_success(result)
|
|
|
|
message = most_recent_message(iago)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(message.id, sent_message_id)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(message.content, "I want burger!")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now that we tested message editing works within the limit,
|
|
|
|
# we want to verify it doesn't work beyond the limit.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# To do that we'll have to wait for the time limit to pass which is
|
|
|
|
# 5 minutes here. Easy, use time.sleep() but mind that it slows down the
|
|
|
|
# test to a great extent which isn't good. This is when mocking comes to rescue.
|
|
|
|
# We can check what the original code does to determine whether the time limit
|
|
|
|
# exceeded and mock that here such that the code runs as if the time limit
|
|
|
|
# exceeded without actually waiting for that long!
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# In this case, it is timezone_now, an alias to django.utils.timezone.now,
|
|
|
|
# to which the difference with message-sent-time is checked. So, we want
|
|
|
|
# that timezone_now() call to return `datetime` object representing time
|
|
|
|
# that is beyond the limit.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Notice how mock.patch() is used here to do exactly the above mentioned.
|
|
|
|
# mock.patch() here makes any calls to `timezone_now` in `zerver.lib.actions`
|
|
|
|
# to return the value passed to `return_value` in the its context.
|
|
|
|
# You can also use mock.patch() as a decorator depending on the
|
|
|
|
# requirements. Read more at the documentaion link provided above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
time_beyond_edit_limit = message_sent_time + datetime.timedelta(
|
|
|
|
seconds=MESSAGE_CONTENT_EDIT_LIMIT + 100
|
|
|
|
) # There's a buffer time applied to the limit, hence the extra 100s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with mock.patch(
|
|
|
|
"zerver.lib.actions.timezone_now",
|
|
|
|
return_value=time_beyond_edit_limit,
|
|
|
|
):
|
|
|
|
result = self.client_patch(
|
|
|
|
f"/json/messages/{sent_message_id}", {"content": "I actually want pizza."}
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assert_json_error(result, msg="The time limit for editing this message has passed")
|
|
|
|
message = most_recent_message(iago)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(message.id, sent_message_id)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(message.content, "I want burger!")
|