zulip/zerver/lib/bugdown/fenced_code.py

351 lines
11 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

"""
Fenced Code Extension for Python Markdown
=========================================
This extension adds Fenced Code Blocks to Python-Markdown.
>>> import markdown
>>> text = '''
... A paragraph before a fenced code block:
...
... ~~~
... Fenced code block
... ~~~
... '''
>>> html = markdown.markdown(text, extensions=['fenced_code'])
>>> print html
<p>A paragraph before a fenced code block:</p>
<pre><code>Fenced code block
</code></pre>
Works with safe_mode also (we check this because we are using the HtmlStash):
>>> print markdown.markdown(text, extensions=['fenced_code'], safe_mode='replace')
<p>A paragraph before a fenced code block:</p>
<pre><code>Fenced code block
</code></pre>
Include tilde's in a code block and wrap with blank lines:
>>> text = '''
... ~~~~~~~~
...
... ~~~~
... ~~~~~~~~'''
>>> print markdown.markdown(text, extensions=['fenced_code'])
<pre><code>
~~~~
</code></pre>
Language tags:
>>> text = '''
... ~~~~{.python}
... # Some python code
... ~~~~'''
>>> print markdown.markdown(text, extensions=['fenced_code'])
<pre><code class="python"># Some python code
</code></pre>
Copyright 2007-2008 [Waylan Limberg](http://achinghead.com/).
Project website: <http://packages.python.org/Markdown/extensions/fenced_code_blocks.html>
Contact: markdown@freewisdom.org
License: BSD (see ../docs/LICENSE for details)
Dependencies:
* [Python 2.4+](http://python.org)
* [Markdown 2.0+](http://packages.python.org/Markdown/)
* [Pygments (optional)](http://pygments.org)
"""
import re
import subprocess
import markdown
import six
from django.utils.html import escape
from markdown.extensions.codehilite import CodeHilite, CodeHiliteExtension
from zerver.lib.str_utils import force_bytes
from zerver.lib.tex import render_tex
from typing import Any, Dict, Iterable, List, MutableSequence, Optional, Tuple, Union, Text
# Global vars
FENCE_RE = re.compile(u"""
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
# ~~~ or ```
(?P<fence>
^(?:~{3,}|`{3,})
)
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
[ ]* # spaces
(
\\{?\\.?
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
(?P<lang>
[a-zA-Z0-9_+-]*
) # "py" or "javascript"
\\}?
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
) # language, like ".py" or "{javascript}"
[ ]* # spaces
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
$
""", re.VERBOSE)
CODE_WRAP = u'<pre><code%s>%s</code></pre>'
LANG_TAG = u' class="%s"'
class FencedCodeExtension(markdown.Extension):
def extendMarkdown(self, md, md_globals):
# type: (markdown.Markdown, Dict[str, Any]) -> None
""" Add FencedBlockPreprocessor to the Markdown instance. """
md.registerExtension(self)
# Newer versions of Python-Markdown (starting at 2.3?) have
# a normalize_whitespace preprocessor that needs to go first.
position = ('>normalize_whitespace'
if 'normalize_whitespace' in md.preprocessors
else '_begin')
md.preprocessors.add('fenced_code_block',
FencedBlockPreprocessor(md),
position)
class FencedBlockPreprocessor(markdown.preprocessors.Preprocessor):
def __init__(self, md):
# type: (markdown.Markdown) -> None
markdown.preprocessors.Preprocessor.__init__(self, md)
self.checked_for_codehilite = False
self.codehilite_conf = {} # type: Dict[str, List[Any]]
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
def run(self, lines):
# type: (Iterable[Text]) -> List[Text]
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
""" Match and store Fenced Code Blocks in the HtmlStash. """
output = [] # type: List[Text]
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
class BaseHandler(object):
def handle_line(self, line):
# type: (Text) -> None
raise NotImplementedError()
def done(self):
# type: () -> None
raise NotImplementedError()
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
processor = self
handlers = [] # type: List[BaseHandler]
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
def push(handler):
# type: (BaseHandler) -> None
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
handlers.append(handler)
def pop():
# type: () -> None
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
handlers.pop()
def check_for_new_fence(output, line):
# type: (MutableSequence[Text], Text) -> None
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
m = FENCE_RE.match(line)
if m:
fence = m.group('fence')
lang = m.group('lang')
handler = generic_handler(output, fence, lang)
push(handler)
else:
output.append(line)
class OuterHandler(BaseHandler):
def __init__(self, output):
# type: (MutableSequence[Text]) -> None
self.output = output
def handle_line(self, line):
# type: (Text) -> None
check_for_new_fence(self.output, line)
def done(self):
# type: () -> None
pop()
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
def generic_handler(output, fence, lang):
# type: (MutableSequence[Text], Text, Text) -> BaseHandler
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
if lang in ('quote', 'quoted'):
return QuoteHandler(output, fence)
elif lang in ('math', 'tex', 'latex'):
return TexHandler(output, fence)
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
else:
return CodeHandler(output, fence, lang)
class CodeHandler(BaseHandler):
def __init__(self, output, fence, lang):
# type: (MutableSequence[Text], Text, Text) -> None
self.output = output
self.fence = fence
self.lang = lang
self.lines = [] # type: List[Text]
def handle_line(self, line):
# type: (Text) -> None
if line.rstrip() == self.fence:
self.done()
else:
self.lines.append(line)
def done(self):
# type: () -> None
text = '\n'.join(self.lines)
text = processor.format_code(self.lang, text)
text = processor.placeholder(text)
processed_lines = text.split('\n')
self.output.append('')
self.output.extend(processed_lines)
self.output.append('')
pop()
class QuoteHandler(BaseHandler):
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
def __init__(self, output, fence):
# type: (MutableSequence[Text], Text) -> None
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
self.output = output
self.fence = fence
self.lines = [] # type: List[Text]
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
def handle_line(self, line):
# type: (Text) -> None
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
if line.rstrip() == self.fence:
self.done()
else:
check_for_new_fence(self.lines, line)
def done(self):
# type: () -> None
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
text = '\n'.join(self.lines)
text = processor.format_quote(text)
processed_lines = text.split('\n')
self.output.append('')
self.output.extend(processed_lines)
self.output.append('')
pop()
class TexHandler(BaseHandler):
def __init__(self, output, fence):
# type: (MutableSequence[Text], Text) -> None
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
self.output = output
self.fence = fence
self.lines = [] # type: List[Text]
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
def handle_line(self, line):
# type: (Text) -> None
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
if line.rstrip() == self.fence:
self.done()
else:
check_for_new_fence(self.lines, line)
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
def done(self):
# type: () -> None
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
text = '\n'.join(self.lines)
text = processor.format_tex(text)
Support arbitrarily nested fenced quote/code blocks. Now we can nest fenced code/quote blocks inside of quote blocks down to arbitrary depths. Code blocks are always leafs. Fenced blocks start with at least three tildes or backticks, and the clump of punctuation then becomes the terminator for the block. If the user ends their message without terminators, all blocks are automatically closed. When inside a quote block, you can start another fenced block with any header that doesn't match the end-string of the outer block. (If you don't want to specify a language, then you can change the number of backticks/tildes to avoid amiguity.) Most of the heavy lifting happens in FencedBlockPreprocessor.run(). The parser works by pushing handlers on to a stack and popping them off when the ends of blocks are encountered. Parents communicate with their children by passing in a simple Python list of strings for the child to append to. Handlers also maintain their own lists for their own content, and when their done() method is called, they render their data as needed. The handlers are objects returned by functions, and the handler functions close on variables push, pop, and processor. The closure style here makes the handlers pretty tightly coupled to the outer run() method. If we wanted to move to a class-based style, the tradeoff would be that the class instances would have to marshall push/pop/processor etc., but we could test the components more easily in isolation. Dealing with blank lines is very fiddly inside of bugdown. The new functionality here is captured in the test BugdownTest.test_complexly_nested_quote(). (imported from commit 53886c8de74bdf2bbd3cef8be9de25f05bddb93c)
2013-11-20 23:25:48 +01:00
text = processor.placeholder(text)
processed_lines = text.split('\n')
self.output.append('')
self.output.extend(processed_lines)
self.output.append('')
pop()
handler = OuterHandler(output)
push(handler)
for line in lines:
handlers[-1].handle_line(line)
while handlers:
handlers[-1].done()
# This fiddly handling of new lines at the end of our output was done to make
# existing tests pass. Bugdown is just kind of funny when it comes to new lines,
# but we could probably remove this hack.
if len(output) > 2 and output[-2] != '':
output.append('')
return output
def format_code(self, lang, text):
# type: (Text, Text) -> Text
if lang:
langclass = LANG_TAG % (lang,)
else:
langclass = ''
# Check for code hilite extension
if not self.checked_for_codehilite:
for ext in self.markdown.registeredExtensions:
if isinstance(ext, CodeHiliteExtension):
self.codehilite_conf = ext.config
break
self.checked_for_codehilite = True
# If config is not empty, then the codehighlite extension
# is enabled, so we call it to highlite the code
if self.codehilite_conf:
highliter = CodeHilite(text,
linenums=self.codehilite_conf['linenums'][0],
guess_lang=self.codehilite_conf['guess_lang'][0],
css_class=self.codehilite_conf['css_class'][0],
style=self.codehilite_conf['pygments_style'][0],
use_pygments=self.codehilite_conf['use_pygments'][0],
lang=(lang or None),
noclasses=self.codehilite_conf['noclasses'][0])
code = highliter.hilite()
else:
code = CODE_WRAP % (langclass, self._escape(text))
return code
def format_quote(self, text):
# type: (Text) -> Text
paragraphs = text.split("\n\n")
quoted_paragraphs = []
for paragraph in paragraphs:
lines = paragraph.split("\n")
quoted_paragraphs.append("\n".join("> " + line for line in lines if line != ''))
return "\n\n".join(quoted_paragraphs)
def format_tex(self, text):
# type: (Text) -> Text
paragraphs = text.split("\n\n")
tex_paragraphs = []
for paragraph in paragraphs:
html = render_tex(paragraph, is_inline=False)
if html is not None:
tex_paragraphs.append(html)
else:
tex_paragraphs.append('<span class="tex-error">' +
escape(paragraph) + '</span>')
return "\n\n".join(tex_paragraphs)
def placeholder(self, code):
# type: (Text) -> Text
return self.markdown.htmlStash.store(code, safe=True)
def _escape(self, txt):
# type: (Text) -> Text
""" basic html escaping """
txt = txt.replace('&', '&amp;')
txt = txt.replace('<', '&lt;')
txt = txt.replace('>', '&gt;')
txt = txt.replace('"', '&quot;')
return txt
def makeExtension(*args, **kwargs):
# type: (*Any, **Union[bool, None, Text]) -> FencedCodeExtension
return FencedCodeExtension(*args, **kwargs)
if __name__ == "__main__":
import doctest
doctest.testmod()