zulip/zerver/views/users.py

485 lines
20 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

from typing import Callable, Union, Optional, Dict, Any, List, Tuple
import os
import ujson
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
2016-06-05 00:47:14 +02:00
from django.http import HttpRequest, HttpResponse
from django.utils.translation import ugettext as _
from django.shortcuts import redirect, render
from django.conf import settings
from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
from zerver.decorator import require_realm_admin, zulip_login_required, \
require_non_guest_human_user
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
from zerver.forms import CreateUserForm
from zerver.lib.actions import do_change_avatar_fields, do_change_bot_owner, \
do_change_is_admin, do_change_default_all_public_streams, \
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
do_change_default_events_register_stream, do_change_default_sending_stream, \
do_create_user, do_deactivate_user, do_reactivate_user, do_regenerate_api_key, \
2018-01-30 19:21:13 +01:00
check_change_full_name, notify_created_bot, do_update_outgoing_webhook_service, \
bots: Prevent bots from having duplicate full names. Bots are not allowed to use the same name as other users in the realm (either bot or human). This is kind of a big commit, but I wanted to combine the post/patch (aka add/edit) checks into one commit, since it's a change in policy that affects both codepaths. A lot of the noise is in tests. We had good coverage on the previous code, including some places like event testing where we were expediently not bothering to use different names for different bots in some longer tests. And then of course I test some new scenarios that are relevant with the new policy. There are two new functions: check_bot_name_available: very simple Django query check_change_bot_full_name: this diverges from the 3-line check_change_full_name, where the latter is still used for the "humans" use case And then we just call those in appropriate places. Note that there is still a loophole here where you can get two bots with the same name if you reactivate a bot named Fred that was inactive when the second bot named Fred was created. Also, we don't attempt to fix historical data. So this commit shouldn't be considered any kind of lockdown, it's just meant to help people from inadvertently creating two bots of the same name where they don't intend to. For more context, we are continuing to allow two human users in the same realm to have the same full name, and our code should generally be tolerant of that possibility. (A good example is our new mention syntax, which disambiguates same-named people using ids.) It's also worth noting that our web app client doesn't try to scrub full_name from its payload in situations where the user has actually only modified other fields in the "Edit bot" UI. Starting here we just handle this on the server, since it's easy to fix there, and even if we fixed it in the web app, there's no guarantee that other clients won't be just as brute force. It wasn't exactly broken before, but we'd needlessly write rows to audit tables. Fixes #10509
2018-09-27 19:25:18 +02:00
do_update_bot_config_data, check_change_bot_full_name
from zerver.lib.avatar import avatar_url, get_gravatar_url, get_avatar_field
from zerver.lib.bot_config import set_bot_config
from zerver.lib.exceptions import JsonableError
from zerver.lib.integrations import EMBEDDED_BOTS
from zerver.lib.request import has_request_variables, REQ
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
from zerver.lib.response import json_error, json_success
from zerver.lib.streams import access_stream_by_name
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
from zerver.lib.upload import upload_avatar_image
from zerver.lib.users import get_api_key
from zerver.lib.validator import check_bool, check_string, check_int, check_url, check_dict
from zerver.lib.users import check_valid_bot_type, check_bot_creation_policy, \
check_full_name, check_short_name, check_valid_interface_type, check_valid_bot_config, \
bots: Prevent bots from having duplicate full names. Bots are not allowed to use the same name as other users in the realm (either bot or human). This is kind of a big commit, but I wanted to combine the post/patch (aka add/edit) checks into one commit, since it's a change in policy that affects both codepaths. A lot of the noise is in tests. We had good coverage on the previous code, including some places like event testing where we were expediently not bothering to use different names for different bots in some longer tests. And then of course I test some new scenarios that are relevant with the new policy. There are two new functions: check_bot_name_available: very simple Django query check_change_bot_full_name: this diverges from the 3-line check_change_full_name, where the latter is still used for the "humans" use case And then we just call those in appropriate places. Note that there is still a loophole here where you can get two bots with the same name if you reactivate a bot named Fred that was inactive when the second bot named Fred was created. Also, we don't attempt to fix historical data. So this commit shouldn't be considered any kind of lockdown, it's just meant to help people from inadvertently creating two bots of the same name where they don't intend to. For more context, we are continuing to allow two human users in the same realm to have the same full name, and our code should generally be tolerant of that possibility. (A good example is our new mention syntax, which disambiguates same-named people using ids.) It's also worth noting that our web app client doesn't try to scrub full_name from its payload in situations where the user has actually only modified other fields in the "Edit bot" UI. Starting here we just handle this on the server, since it's easy to fix there, and even if we fixed it in the web app, there's no guarantee that other clients won't be just as brute force. It wasn't exactly broken before, but we'd needlessly write rows to audit tables. Fixes #10509
2018-09-27 19:25:18 +02:00
access_bot_by_id, add_service, access_user_by_id, check_bot_name_available
from zerver.lib.utils import generate_api_key, generate_random_token
from zerver.models import UserProfile, Stream, Message, email_allowed_for_realm, \
get_user, Service, get_user_including_cross_realm, \
DomainNotAllowedForRealmError, DisposableEmailError, get_user_profile_by_id_in_realm, \
EmailContainsPlusError, get_user_by_id_in_realm_including_cross_realm
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
def deactivate_user_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile,
user_id: int) -> HttpResponse:
target = access_user_by_id(user_profile, user_id)
if check_last_admin(target):
return json_error(_('Cannot deactivate the only organization administrator'))
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
return _deactivate_user_profile_backend(request, user_profile, target)
def deactivate_user_own_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile) -> HttpResponse:
if user_profile.is_realm_admin and check_last_admin(user_profile):
return json_error(_('Cannot deactivate the only organization administrator'))
do_deactivate_user(user_profile, acting_user=user_profile)
return json_success()
def check_last_admin(user_profile: UserProfile) -> bool:
admins = set(user_profile.realm.get_admin_users())
return user_profile.is_realm_admin and len(admins) == 1
def deactivate_bot_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile,
bot_id: int) -> HttpResponse:
target = access_bot_by_id(user_profile, bot_id)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
return _deactivate_user_profile_backend(request, user_profile, target)
def _deactivate_user_profile_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile,
target: UserProfile) -> HttpResponse:
do_deactivate_user(target, acting_user=user_profile)
return json_success()
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
def reactivate_user_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile,
user_id: int) -> HttpResponse:
target = access_user_by_id(user_profile, user_id, allow_deactivated=True, allow_bots=True)
if target.is_bot:
assert target.bot_type is not None
check_bot_creation_policy(user_profile, target.bot_type)
do_reactivate_user(target, acting_user=user_profile)
return json_success()
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
@has_request_variables
def update_user_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile, user_id: int,
full_name: Optional[str]=REQ(default="", validator=check_string),
is_admin: Optional[bool]=REQ(default=None, validator=check_bool)) -> HttpResponse:
target = access_user_by_id(user_profile, user_id, allow_deactivated=True, allow_bots=True)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
if is_admin is not None and target.is_realm_admin != is_admin:
if not is_admin and check_last_admin(user_profile):
return json_error(_('Cannot remove the only organization administrator'))
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
do_change_is_admin(target, is_admin)
if (full_name is not None and target.full_name != full_name and
full_name.strip() != ""):
# We don't respect `name_changes_disabled` here because the request
# is on behalf of the administrator.
check_change_full_name(target, full_name, user_profile)
return json_success()
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
def avatar(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile,
email_or_id: str, medium: bool=False) -> HttpResponse:
"""Accepts an email address or user ID and returns the avatar"""
is_email = False
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
try:
int(email_or_id)
except ValueError:
is_email = True
try:
realm = user_profile.realm
if is_email:
avatar_user_profile = get_user_including_cross_realm(email_or_id, realm)
else:
avatar_user_profile = get_user_by_id_in_realm_including_cross_realm(int(email_or_id), realm)
# If there is a valid user account passed in, use its avatar
url = avatar_url(avatar_user_profile, medium=medium)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
except UserProfile.DoesNotExist:
# If there is no such user, treat it as a new gravatar
email = email_or_id
avatar_version = 1
url = get_gravatar_url(email, avatar_version, medium)
# We can rely on the url already having query parameters. Because
# our templates depend on being able to use the ampersand to
# add query parameters to our url, get_avatar_url does '?x=x'
# hacks to prevent us from having to jump through decode/encode hoops.
assert url is not None
assert '?' in url
url += '&' + request.META['QUERY_STRING']
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
return redirect(url)
def get_stream_name(stream: Optional[Stream]) -> Optional[str]:
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
if stream:
return stream.name
return None
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
@require_non_guest_human_user
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
@has_request_variables
def patch_bot_backend(
request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile, bot_id: int,
full_name: Optional[str]=REQ(default=None),
bot_owner_id: Optional[int]=REQ(default=None),
config_data: Optional[Dict[str, str]]=REQ(default=None,
validator=check_dict(value_validator=check_string)),
service_payload_url: Optional[str]=REQ(validator=check_url, default=None),
service_interface: Optional[int]=REQ(validator=check_int, default=1),
default_sending_stream: Optional[str]=REQ(default=None),
default_events_register_stream: Optional[str]=REQ(default=None),
default_all_public_streams: Optional[bool]=REQ(default=None, validator=check_bool)
) -> HttpResponse:
bot = access_bot_by_id(user_profile, bot_id)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
if full_name is not None:
bots: Prevent bots from having duplicate full names. Bots are not allowed to use the same name as other users in the realm (either bot or human). This is kind of a big commit, but I wanted to combine the post/patch (aka add/edit) checks into one commit, since it's a change in policy that affects both codepaths. A lot of the noise is in tests. We had good coverage on the previous code, including some places like event testing where we were expediently not bothering to use different names for different bots in some longer tests. And then of course I test some new scenarios that are relevant with the new policy. There are two new functions: check_bot_name_available: very simple Django query check_change_bot_full_name: this diverges from the 3-line check_change_full_name, where the latter is still used for the "humans" use case And then we just call those in appropriate places. Note that there is still a loophole here where you can get two bots with the same name if you reactivate a bot named Fred that was inactive when the second bot named Fred was created. Also, we don't attempt to fix historical data. So this commit shouldn't be considered any kind of lockdown, it's just meant to help people from inadvertently creating two bots of the same name where they don't intend to. For more context, we are continuing to allow two human users in the same realm to have the same full name, and our code should generally be tolerant of that possibility. (A good example is our new mention syntax, which disambiguates same-named people using ids.) It's also worth noting that our web app client doesn't try to scrub full_name from its payload in situations where the user has actually only modified other fields in the "Edit bot" UI. Starting here we just handle this on the server, since it's easy to fix there, and even if we fixed it in the web app, there's no guarantee that other clients won't be just as brute force. It wasn't exactly broken before, but we'd needlessly write rows to audit tables. Fixes #10509
2018-09-27 19:25:18 +02:00
check_change_bot_full_name(bot, full_name, user_profile)
if bot_owner_id is not None:
try:
owner = get_user_profile_by_id_in_realm(bot_owner_id, user_profile.realm)
except UserProfile.DoesNotExist:
return json_error(_('Failed to change owner, no such user'))
if not owner.is_active:
return json_error(_('Failed to change owner, user is deactivated'))
if owner.is_bot:
return json_error(_("Failed to change owner, bots can't own other bots"))
previous_owner = bot.bot_owner
if previous_owner != owner:
do_change_bot_owner(bot, owner, user_profile)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
if default_sending_stream is not None:
if default_sending_stream == "":
2017-02-11 05:45:39 +01:00
stream = None # type: Optional[Stream]
else:
(stream, recipient, sub) = access_stream_by_name(
user_profile, default_sending_stream)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
do_change_default_sending_stream(bot, stream)
if default_events_register_stream is not None:
if default_events_register_stream == "":
stream = None
else:
(stream, recipient, sub) = access_stream_by_name(
user_profile, default_events_register_stream)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
do_change_default_events_register_stream(bot, stream)
if default_all_public_streams is not None:
do_change_default_all_public_streams(bot, default_all_public_streams)
if service_payload_url is not None:
check_valid_interface_type(service_interface)
assert service_interface is not None
do_update_outgoing_webhook_service(bot, service_interface, service_payload_url)
2018-01-30 19:21:13 +01:00
if config_data is not None:
do_update_bot_config_data(bot, config_data)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
if len(request.FILES) == 0:
pass
elif len(request.FILES) == 1:
user_file = list(request.FILES.values())[0]
upload_avatar_image(user_file, user_profile, bot)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
avatar_source = UserProfile.AVATAR_FROM_USER
do_change_avatar_fields(bot, avatar_source)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
else:
return json_error(_("You may only upload one file at a time"))
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
json_result = dict(
full_name=bot.full_name,
avatar_url=avatar_url(bot),
service_interface = service_interface,
service_payload_url = service_payload_url,
2018-01-30 19:21:13 +01:00
config_data = config_data,
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
default_sending_stream=get_stream_name(bot.default_sending_stream),
default_events_register_stream=get_stream_name(bot.default_events_register_stream),
default_all_public_streams=bot.default_all_public_streams,
)
# Don't include the bot owner in case it is not set.
# Default bots have no owner.
if bot.bot_owner is not None:
json_result['bot_owner'] = bot.bot_owner.email
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
return json_success(json_result)
@require_non_guest_human_user
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
@has_request_variables
def regenerate_bot_api_key(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile, bot_id: int) -> HttpResponse:
bot = access_bot_by_id(user_profile, bot_id)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
do_regenerate_api_key(bot, user_profile)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
json_result = dict(
api_key = bot.api_key
)
return json_success(json_result)
@require_non_guest_human_user
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
@has_request_variables
def add_bot_backend(
request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile,
full_name_raw: str=REQ("full_name"), short_name_raw: str=REQ("short_name"),
bot_type: int=REQ(validator=check_int, default=UserProfile.DEFAULT_BOT),
payload_url: Optional[str]=REQ(validator=check_url, default=""),
service_name: Optional[str]=REQ(default=None),
config_data: Dict[str, str]=REQ(default={},
validator=check_dict(value_validator=check_string)),
interface_type: int=REQ(validator=check_int, default=Service.GENERIC),
default_sending_stream_name: Optional[str]=REQ('default_sending_stream', default=None),
default_events_register_stream_name: Optional[str]=REQ('default_events_register_stream',
default=None),
default_all_public_streams: Optional[bool]=REQ(validator=check_bool, default=None)
) -> HttpResponse:
short_name = check_short_name(short_name_raw)
service_name = service_name or short_name
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
short_name += "-bot"
full_name = check_full_name(full_name_raw)
email = '%s@%s' % (short_name, user_profile.realm.get_bot_domain())
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
form = CreateUserForm({'full_name': full_name, 'email': email})
if bot_type == UserProfile.EMBEDDED_BOT:
if not settings.EMBEDDED_BOTS_ENABLED:
return json_error(_("Embedded bots are not enabled."))
if service_name not in [bot.name for bot in EMBEDDED_BOTS]:
return json_error(_("Invalid embedded bot name."))
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
if not form.is_valid():
# We validate client-side as well
return json_error(_('Bad name or username'))
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
try:
get_user(email, user_profile.realm)
return json_error(_("Username already in use"))
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
except UserProfile.DoesNotExist:
pass
bots: Prevent bots from having duplicate full names. Bots are not allowed to use the same name as other users in the realm (either bot or human). This is kind of a big commit, but I wanted to combine the post/patch (aka add/edit) checks into one commit, since it's a change in policy that affects both codepaths. A lot of the noise is in tests. We had good coverage on the previous code, including some places like event testing where we were expediently not bothering to use different names for different bots in some longer tests. And then of course I test some new scenarios that are relevant with the new policy. There are two new functions: check_bot_name_available: very simple Django query check_change_bot_full_name: this diverges from the 3-line check_change_full_name, where the latter is still used for the "humans" use case And then we just call those in appropriate places. Note that there is still a loophole here where you can get two bots with the same name if you reactivate a bot named Fred that was inactive when the second bot named Fred was created. Also, we don't attempt to fix historical data. So this commit shouldn't be considered any kind of lockdown, it's just meant to help people from inadvertently creating two bots of the same name where they don't intend to. For more context, we are continuing to allow two human users in the same realm to have the same full name, and our code should generally be tolerant of that possibility. (A good example is our new mention syntax, which disambiguates same-named people using ids.) It's also worth noting that our web app client doesn't try to scrub full_name from its payload in situations where the user has actually only modified other fields in the "Edit bot" UI. Starting here we just handle this on the server, since it's easy to fix there, and even if we fixed it in the web app, there's no guarantee that other clients won't be just as brute force. It wasn't exactly broken before, but we'd needlessly write rows to audit tables. Fixes #10509
2018-09-27 19:25:18 +02:00
check_bot_name_available(
realm_id=user_profile.realm_id,
full_name=full_name,
)
check_bot_creation_policy(user_profile, bot_type)
check_valid_bot_type(user_profile, bot_type)
check_valid_interface_type(interface_type)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
if len(request.FILES) == 0:
avatar_source = UserProfile.AVATAR_FROM_GRAVATAR
elif len(request.FILES) != 1:
return json_error(_("You may only upload one file at a time"))
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
else:
avatar_source = UserProfile.AVATAR_FROM_USER
2016-06-05 00:47:14 +02:00
default_sending_stream = None
if default_sending_stream_name is not None:
(default_sending_stream, ignored_rec, ignored_sub) = access_stream_by_name(
user_profile, default_sending_stream_name)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
2016-06-05 00:47:14 +02:00
default_events_register_stream = None
if default_events_register_stream_name is not None:
(default_events_register_stream, ignored_rec, ignored_sub) = access_stream_by_name(
user_profile, default_events_register_stream_name)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
if bot_type == UserProfile.EMBEDDED_BOT:
check_valid_bot_config(service_name, config_data)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
bot_profile = do_create_user(email=email, password='',
realm=user_profile.realm, full_name=full_name,
short_name=short_name,
bot_type=bot_type,
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
bot_owner=user_profile,
avatar_source=avatar_source,
default_sending_stream=default_sending_stream,
default_events_register_stream=default_events_register_stream,
default_all_public_streams=default_all_public_streams)
if len(request.FILES) == 1:
user_file = list(request.FILES.values())[0]
upload_avatar_image(user_file, user_profile, bot_profile)
if bot_type in (UserProfile.OUTGOING_WEBHOOK_BOT, UserProfile.EMBEDDED_BOT):
add_service(name=service_name,
user_profile=bot_profile,
base_url=payload_url,
interface=interface_type,
token=generate_api_key())
if bot_type == UserProfile.EMBEDDED_BOT:
for key, value in config_data.items():
set_bot_config(bot_profile, key, value)
notify_created_bot(bot_profile)
api_key = get_api_key(bot_profile)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
json_result = dict(
api_key=api_key,
2017-01-24 07:06:13 +01:00
avatar_url=avatar_url(bot_profile),
default_sending_stream=get_stream_name(bot_profile.default_sending_stream),
default_events_register_stream=get_stream_name(bot_profile.default_events_register_stream),
default_all_public_streams=bot_profile.default_all_public_streams,
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
)
return json_success(json_result)
@require_non_guest_human_user
def get_bots_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile) -> HttpResponse:
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
bot_profiles = UserProfile.objects.filter(is_bot=True, is_active=True,
bot_owner=user_profile)
bot_profiles = bot_profiles.select_related('default_sending_stream', 'default_events_register_stream')
bot_profiles = bot_profiles.order_by('date_joined')
def bot_info(bot_profile: UserProfile) -> Dict[str, Any]:
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
default_sending_stream = get_stream_name(bot_profile.default_sending_stream)
default_events_register_stream = get_stream_name(bot_profile.default_events_register_stream)
# Bots are supposed to have only one API key, at least for now.
# Therefore we can safely asume that one and only valid API key will be
# the first one.
api_key = get_api_key(bot_profile)
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
return dict(
username=bot_profile.email,
full_name=bot_profile.full_name,
api_key=api_key,
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
avatar_url=avatar_url(bot_profile),
default_sending_stream=default_sending_stream,
default_events_register_stream=default_events_register_stream,
default_all_public_streams=bot_profile.default_all_public_streams,
)
return json_success({'bots': list(map(bot_info, bot_profiles))})
@has_request_variables
def get_members_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile,
client_gravatar: bool=REQ(validator=check_bool, default=False)) -> HttpResponse:
'''
The client_gravatar field here is set to True if clients can compute
their own gravatars, which saves us bandwidth. We want to eventually
make this the default behavior, but we have old clients that expect
the server to compute this for us.
'''
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
realm = user_profile.realm
query = UserProfile.objects.filter(
realm_id=realm.id
).values(
'id',
'email',
'realm_id',
'full_name',
'is_bot',
'is_realm_admin',
'is_active',
'bot_type',
'avatar_source',
'avatar_version',
'bot_owner__email',
)
def get_member(row: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
email = row['email']
user_id = row['id']
result = dict(
user_id=user_id,
email=email,
full_name=row['full_name'],
is_bot=row['is_bot'],
is_active=row['is_active'],
is_admin=row['is_realm_admin'],
bot_type=row['bot_type'],
)
result['avatar_url'] = get_avatar_field(
user_id=user_id,
email=email,
avatar_source=row['avatar_source'],
avatar_version=row['avatar_version'],
realm_id=row['realm_id'],
medium=False,
client_gravatar=client_gravatar,
)
if row['bot_owner__email']:
result['bot_owner'] = row['bot_owner__email']
return result
members = [get_member(row) for row in query]
2015-11-24 05:26:33 +01:00
return json_success({'members': members})
@require_realm_admin
@has_request_variables
def create_user_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile,
email: str=REQ(), password: str=REQ(), full_name_raw: str=REQ("full_name"),
short_name: str=REQ()) -> HttpResponse:
full_name = check_full_name(full_name_raw)
form = CreateUserForm({'full_name': full_name, 'email': email})
if not form.is_valid():
return json_error(_('Bad name or username'))
# Check that the new user's email address belongs to the admin's realm
# (Since this is an admin API, we don't require the user to have been
# invited first.)
realm = user_profile.realm
try:
email_allowed_for_realm(email, user_profile.realm)
except DomainNotAllowedForRealmError:
return json_error(_("Email '%(email)s' not allowed in this organization") %
{'email': email})
except DisposableEmailError:
return json_error(_("Disposable email addresses are not allowed in this organization"))
except EmailContainsPlusError:
return json_error(_("Email addresses containing + are not allowed."))
try:
get_user(email, user_profile.realm)
return json_error(_("Email '%s' already in use") % (email,))
except UserProfile.DoesNotExist:
pass
do_create_user(email, password, realm, full_name, short_name)
return json_success()
def generate_client_id() -> str:
return generate_random_token(32)
def get_profile_backend(request: HttpRequest, user_profile: UserProfile) -> HttpResponse:
result = dict(pointer = user_profile.pointer,
client_id = generate_client_id(),
max_message_id = -1,
user_id = user_profile.id,
full_name = user_profile.full_name,
email = user_profile.email,
is_bot = user_profile.is_bot,
is_admin = user_profile.is_realm_admin,
short_name = user_profile.short_name)
messages = Message.objects.filter(usermessage__user_profile=user_profile).order_by('-id')[:1]
if messages:
result['max_message_id'] = messages[0].id
return json_success(result)
def team_view(request: HttpRequest) -> HttpResponse:
with open(settings.CONTRIBUTORS_DATA) as f:
data = ujson.load(f)
return render(
request,
'zerver/team.html',
context=data,
)